That is what it looks like.
In a previous ruling the judge specifically mentioned all points individually with an MTD allowed/denied - with leave to amend.
The amendment included the previously MTD denied points and an amended point.
In this latest ruling the judge mentioned only one point with MTD allowed subject to another amendment.
So following the logic of the previous ruling the allowed points are still allowed to be made in the new amendment - but 2.4 may get knocked back again unless they have a previously unmentioned zinger/show stopper which is presumably unlikely unless some fiendish last minute AHA! tactic is being depolyed - which I doubt but who knows..).
(apologies for the re-tread - trying to get it straight in my own head as much as anything).
That's it.
The original complaint was filed way back in Dec 2017. The first amended complaint superseded that, the second amended complaint supersedes the first.
The second amended complaint is online in full at pacer and posted on docdroid, all 6 components of the complaint are listed, 2 dismissed, 4 going forward and Skadden can amend the dismissed complaints within 21 days.
There's no arguing with it, that's the court order.
Should something come up in discovery which supports a dismissed complaint there is an opportunity to have it put back on the table.