And you're not?your wasting everybodys time with your comments.
Like I said, if you have a problem with carriers or any other part of the game, then contact Frontier directly because they won't read about your grievances here.
Good luck with it.
And you're not?your wasting everybodys time with your comments.
yes they doAnd you're not?
Like I said, if you have a problem with carriers or any other part of the game, then contact Frontier directly because they won't read about your grievances here.
Hi.
Colliding them in to one FC icon in a system is a good idea, I would like that for a start. That is actually (basicly) what Im asking for and there is more to be improved. Thank You.
You are first person who wanted to and see there is a SPACE to improve.
hmm...cant argue with a old timer like youDoesn't mean they'll take anyone's rantings seriously. I wouldn't with the tone of many people.
hmm...cant argue with a old timer like you
No, you misunderstood, all carriers would be listed in same menu, nothing would be changed. All would happened would be they will not be mixed with planets and stations.It is actually a very bad idea.
Checking the System Map and looking at individual carriers will give you a hint of what services they offer.
And that information if offered only in the system map
No, you misunderstood, all carriers would be listed in same menu, nothing would be changed. All would happened would be they will not be mixed with planets and stations.
Rather then scrolling thru 100+ carriers mixed with planets and stations you will have separate menu (FC) to choose if you wish to land on a carrier.It is actually a very bad idea.
Checking the System Map and looking at individual carriers will give you a hint of what services they offer.
And that information if offered only in the system map
system map is the same but minus carriers in separate menu. that is allSo you want a complete re-design of the System Map screen?
That's as likely to happen as we getting a medium Gutamaya ship.
Actually the latter has more chances to happen. I hope.
Rather then scrolling thru 100+ carriers mixed with planets and stations you will have separate menu (FC) to choose if you wish to land on a carrier.
system map is the same but minus carriers in separate menu. that is all
planets and stations separate and carriers separate.
No need for FILTER
Thats is where your are wrong. Carriers should not be consider Space Stations. They can MOVE. They should not be listed on System MAP or SYSTEM LIST !!!You dont really scroll in system map.
you just point and click with the mouse
you scroll in the nav panel - and while it may be annoying, it is still faster than to have to delve in extra menus, then scroll
Nope, carriers are stations.
You have to see them in the System Map - because you have to see what body they are orbiting and to check the extended info about them carriers.
But i see your point.
You dont want to use filters.
And because of that you want a way that you think it will be easier for you - while at the same time it will be way harder for the actual carrier users.
ntz, ntz, ntz, oh boy
Trade as much as you want. Dont show it on system maps.Thats is where your are wrong. Carriers should not be consider Space Stations. They can MOVE. They should not be listed on System MAP or SYSTEM LIST !!!
They are SHIPS !! Nothing that can move should be listed in System list or shown on System MAP.
While in system, the carriers are stationary.Only Stationary objects should be listed and shown on system map or listing.
they move from system to system. I will park my Voultur next to a station for a week. it is a stationary. show me on the map and list me on an system listWhile in system, the carriers are stationary.
Thats is where your are wrong. Carriers should not be consider Space Stations. They can MOVE. They should not be listed on System MAP or SYSTEM LIST !!!
They are SHIPS !! Nothing that can move should be listed in System list or shown on System MAP.