Nonsense, that would be too hard on the distro.
Hauler huge hardpoint WHEN?
Would not make sense to do so.Huge hardpoint for T7 when
I will start this off by admitting the amount of T-10 Pilots out there is going to be small but that shouldn't devalue what could be a very good ship and one that with a few tweaks could be even PVP viable.
This post will be broken down into a few key sections that I think describe what the intention with the T-10 was meant to be and how it could be buffed a little to help it into its own section of the big ship tree, Currently the T-10 struggles in anything other than looking damn cool. The cool kids club love spoilers.
What is the T-10 designed for?
The T-10 is from my view a ship designed to fill in the support role of the big ship line up with some added firepower while being slow as the name of the ship suggests... its designed to defend its space and do it well.
Currently however the T-10 struggles with this due to its extremely low speed and poor defense, the T-10 compared to the rest of the big ship line up is worse in every way other than hardpoint count but can never get in range or stay in range long enough to use those extra hardpoints. The anaconda is the closest of the big ships with a defending/support role though the Anaconda focuses on jump range over defenses and agility, this is fine as the Anaconda fills its role as a long range defense ship.
The T-10 seems to be just like the Anaconda but with a higher focus on combat vs exploration, though lacks all of the main components that make a ship better for combat, so how do we fix this?
Speed
First off the speed of the ship is downright too slow, even when using long range weapons. its slower than ALL of the big ships and vs a Imperial Cutter the T-10 is slower by 175m/s this is insane given larger ships have a much lower acceleration and turn rate than Medium or Small ships. the T-10 will never catch an Imperial Cutter for more than a few seconds during a fight unless the Imperial Cutter pilot decides to fit in front of the T-10, and can just boost once to move out of the range of the T-10.
My suggestion to fix this would be to reduce the mass of the T-10 to 1,000 tons down from 1,200 tons, a T-10 would still be much slower though the window the T-10 would have vs other larger ship would be increased to a much more suitable range considering the main target for this ship is larger ships itself. Another option could be to also add the option to fit Class 8 Thrusters as the Imperial Cutter has.
Defenses
Defenses where always going to be an issue with such a large ship and its no surprise this ship suffers from a shield that is far to weak given its size and speed, a prismatic T-10 with all the boosters in the world will only reach 5,000 MJ of shielding and while this does sound like plenty of shielding for most ships, keep in mind the sheer size of the T-10, its shield is simply far to weak for such a large combat focused ship, for comparison the Imperial Cutter can get upwards of 9,000 MJ of shield, the Federal Corvette can get upwards of 7,000, all three ships are considered combat military ships though the T-10 has less shielding than a Anaconda clocking in at 6,500 MJ.
My suggestion to fix this one is super simple, raise the base shielding to 500 from 320, this would give it more shielding than a Anaconda but less than a Federal Corvette allowing the Corvette to maintain its shield advantage.
Masslock
Most players do not consider masslock when looking for their next ship, masslock is something used to prevent escape or deny an enemy from jumping out and dropping back in for a better position, given the name of the T-10 being a ship meant for defending it would make sense that this ship be given a much higher masslock than other large ships, something it DID have when it was first released but was removed with no patch note detailing why.
My fix for masslock and something I would be very keen to see is a ship outright worse than other larger ships but possessing a higher masslock than even a Imperial Cutter, this would reinforce its support role acting as the anchor for the group the T-10 is with.
Super Cruise
Lol is this broken? its faster to drop and turn vs turning in super cruise... no other ship needs this?! will post a comparison video soon.
I am interested to see what others think about this ship, its fun to fly and could be a competitive large ship to combat the annoying Imperial Cutter spam due to it being outright better.
To save a few more credits go to a Li Yong-Rui system. You get a better discount iirc. I've only had mine since the last beta (where I test drove it) and I'm getting to like it more and more. Its my first big combat ship and its fun.
GL HF Commanders
I love the T10 for it looks and the cockpit, but FD messed it up too bad to be useful imho.By the way, for everyone saying it's useless, it's not. It's not the best at anything. But I, personally, love it.
I took it to Beagle Point and Semotus Beacon, the farthest point any ship can reach in game. I have about 45L jump with it and you just can't beat the view for exploring. Plus I was fitted out with repair and fuel limpets. I repaired many dedicated explorer Phantoms and AspXs on DW2 as a Hull Seal.
I reached Triple Elite in it, and against thargoid scouts it is fantastic if you put 2 large and 2 med AX MC turrets on top, the scouts pop in seconds. I put 3 rails ( the lower med and 2 small) on it just to give me something to do while the turrets did their work. Against interceptors.. you have to be really really good. I can take out Cyclops consistently, you just don't fight them the way you normally do, there's no running. You sit there and slug it out, and you need to take out the swarm fast. But it's doable, it's just not EASY.
I do painite strip mining with it. I make about 300million a run (2 hours usually).
Do I want changes? yes. I want them to fix supercruise to bring it in line with the other large ships like Conda or Cutter or Beluga, there's no reason for the horrible response in supercruise. I would love them to fix the convergence, but don't expect that'll happen.
For the T10 to be the top Thargoid interceptor killier, it would need a speed of over 450 and 4 hardpoints that have a tight convergence. This won't happen. FDev obviously doesn't care about the T10 anymore. Or, remove the arbitrary 4 hardpoint limit on AX weapons and see what a T10 can do with 9 AX weapons
It's not the best ship at anything. Neither was the Millenium Falcon. The T10 is my millenium falcon, I have more fun in that ship than any other ship in the game, all your min max numbers be damned
View attachment 142646View attachment 142647
I think the overall point is such a balance change would arguably make the T10D OP given how the rest of the ship is (and how other ships are) balanced.For the T10 to be the top Thargoid interceptor killier, it would need a speed of over 450 and 4 hardpoints that have a tight convergence. This won't happen. FDev obviously doesn't care about the T10 anymore. Or, remove the arbitrary 4 hardpoint limit on AX weapons and see what a T10 can do with 9 AX weapons![]()
I think the overall point is such a balance change would arguably make the T10D OP given how the rest of the ship is (and how other ships are) balanced.
As for removing the 4 Hardpoint limit on AX/Guardian/Experimental weapons, I think they have kept that limit for balancing reasons across the board.
The T10 was clearly designed in accordance with and kept in line with the lore that resulted in it's introduction. If people are expecting any balance revisions beyond minor then effectively we are talking about introducing a new ship. Like it or not, the T10D is fairly balanced as-is - FD did not mess up, lore wise: the T10D was released as a stop-gap design with the Chieftain/Challenger/Crusader ships being the long term answer.
If any serious or significant update to to the T10D design is in the offing, then we are most likely talking about something along the lines of a T11 Avenger (or something like that) - essentially a totally new ship design based on similar core principles but perhaps trading off at least some of the current benefits of the T10D for the kind of things some are asking for. The price tag would notionally be updated appropriately too.
I tried the T-10 as a Thargoid scout "killer" very recently, but abandoned it as a bad idea and went back to the Krait Phantom. It may be the same problem I had with it in PvE combat - poor manoueverability:
but fit a SLF and the T-10 becomes very effective at PvE, assuming the weapons are sufficiently engineered for efficiency, etc. etc. It is like a massive weapons base supporting the SLF.
Presumably, this was the idea for it to be a Thargoid killer, but I can't see it working against Scouts on its own, which are just too fast for it, and SLFs are no match for the bigger Thargoids (are they any good against scouts?). But then, as OP has said, it is intended to fight as a defender with other ships.
Unless someone has got it to work on its own against Thargoids ? ..............
Meanwhile, it's a splendid ExplorerBut, yes, supercruise handling really needs a review.
They were conventional weapons, no AX weapons, and although some were turretted, not all.Sorry to resurect this, but I was going to try a T-10 against scouts myself after seeing this post on Reddit:
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/em9una/triple_elite_finally_1813_scouts_have_been_harmed/
After reading your post, I'm having second thoughts. What weapons did you fit? Did you try 4x large turreted AX MCs firing at will?
Thanks!!
What about a mix of AX turrets in the large, then advanced multis with AX ammo everywhere else?They were conventional weapons, no AX weapons, and although some were turretted, not all.
With hindsight, I should have gone AX turretted route, which would make it a more potent figthing machine against Thargoids, I suspect.
Sure, why not ? That's what I like about the T-10 ... there are so many possibilities for loadouts with this ship.What about a mix of AX turrets in the large, then advanced multis with AX ammo everywhere else?
Sure, why not? That's what I like about the T-10 ... there are so many possibilities for loadouts with this ship.
Welcome !I am introducing a friend to the game and we are doing some Cowboy Beebop type stuff where he is an interceptor and I am a mobile artillery piece/loot storage. I recently cleaned out my bank to buy the T-10 and was wondering how I should build it for a gunboat/support ship. Cant believe after 200 hours i still feel like a complete newbie.
Boy is this thing a chungus.
First post on the forum too, hopefully it isn't the last in the thread!
I had a lot of fun the other day with a combination of 4 large autocannon turrets with longrange mod, and a combination of experimentals, 3 medium turreted burst lasers (also longrange), and 2 small fixed long range auto cannons (though long range rails work pretty well here too - useful for potting ships that run). This combo doesn't require a lot of energy in weapons, so you can keep the shields buffed or move power to engines to try and keep up with the fight.I am introducing a friend to the game and we are doing some Cowboy Beebop type stuff where he is an interceptor and I am a mobile artillery piece/loot storage. I recently cleaned out my bank to buy the T-10 and was wondering how I should build it for a gunboat/support ship. Cant believe after 200 hours i still feel like a complete newbie.
Boy is this thing a chungus.
First post on the forum too, hopefully it isn't the last in the thread!