Interestingly though, I have heard it DOES draw a keelback. Which is basically a t6. I wonder if that means the omission of T-series ships is intentional?T6, T7 and T9.
Interestingly though, I have heard it DOES draw a keelback. Which is basically a t6. I wonder if that means the omission of T-series ships is intentional?T6, T7 and T9.
Speaking of UAs... what were the ships that the UA did not draw? A T6 was one, from memory... perhaps they're looking for an incubator! Like, T6s being a midwife. Or something.
T6, T7 and T9.
Interestingly though, I have heard it DOES draw a keelback. Which is basically a t6. I wonder if that means the omission of T-series ships is intentional?
I believe so, though if it has to do with "threat" vs "non-threat," They why does it also draw the hauler and orca? Many unanswered questions...Interestingly though, I have heard it DOES draw a keelback. Which is basically a t6. I wonder if that means the omission of T-series ships is intentional?
Interestingly though, I have heard it DOES draw a keelback. Which is basically a t6. I wonder if that means the omission of T-series ships is intentional?
No, it's a bug.
Michael
No, it's a bug.
Michael
chthalamoid
No, it's a bug.
Michael
The drawing of a Keelback is a bug or the lack of drawing of the T series in general?
No, it's a bug.
Michael
That's how I took it as well. Oh well, so much for my hypothesis.I'd assume he meant the T ships not being drawn is a bug. Maybe an issue with names containing digits?![]()
That's how I took it as well. Oh well, so much for my hypothesis.
That means I can take my Asp instead of my t6 now!
The drawing of a Keelback is a bug or the lack of drawing of the T series in general?
The lack of Type x drawing.
Michael
The lack of Type x drawing.
Michael
Thank You Sir for the clarification and to Canonn: BOOM that is it on to other ideas.