Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Cmdr Trav ElEr

C
and one more :)

HOTTEST RINGED STELLAR BODY
PW2010 334 B 1 WITH 1'845.00K CMDR TRAV ELER

ringedstellarbody_hottest.pngringedstellarbody_hottest2.png


roam wide
 

Niddi

N
Ender said:
This is obviously wrong because a planet doesn't stop being a water world when it's deemed terraformable.

Edit: Similarly, a water world can be a high metal content planet as well (and usually is) - the latter is just a much larger group and most of the former are a part of it.


Don't waste time of Rukmerot and Patau with such "records", please - not every entry has to be filled immediately and there are many ammonia worlds that are over 3x closer than yours. I saw some just yesterday and could provide evidence but saw no point as they were over 100 Ly from Sol and there are many even closer. Additionally, your evidence isn't enough to prove the distance.
Click to expand...

But it's the way Patau chose to implement it. And as I already said, he will try to change stuff this weekend, so we will just have to wait. If you're not happy with it after the changes, you can talk to him and make suggestions and hopefully we're all happy at the end.

And as for the blanks: Patau even asked us to provide records for them, even if they're obviously not real records.
 

Ender

Ender
andyl said:
I disagree. If it just says FINDER then a lot of people will automatically assume that there must be one much closer, or much colder, or much hotter of whatever. If there is a record there (even if it is an easily beatable record) people will submit anything they find that beats it.

So if both nearest and furthest away from Sol are currently blank, and someone submits any other record - I would like to see both the distance records getting filled in - however that doesn't happen unless people give the distance from Sol. Unfortunately distance to places requires a bit more work from commanders to find out - it isn't (quite rightly) displayed on the info on the system map.
Click to expand...
Don't you see that when you provide a "record" you know it will easily be beaten you are wasting not only your time?

Edit:
Niddi said:
But it's the way Patau chose to implement it. And as I already said, he will try to change stuff this weekend, so we will just have to wait. If you're not happy with it after the changes, you can talk to him and make suggestions and hopefully we're all happy at the end.
Click to expand...
The issue has nothing to do with implementation and everything with interpretation.

Niddi said:
And as for the blanks: Patau even asked us to provide records for them, even if they're obviously not real records.
Click to expand...
This is strange as from the amount of errors I would say that they definitely lack of time.
 
Last edited:

Cmdr Trav ElEr

C
Patau82 said:
we need to see a system pic that includes the planet for this record as metal-rich and high metal content have bugged descriptions
Click to expand...

aren't they just uniformely switched? I guess should have paid more attention :)

Will get you one asap.

here we go. two pics as its two neighbouring ones:

metalrich_hottest2.pngmetalrich_largest2.png
 

Ender

Ender
Patau, I've been able to find only 16 white dwarfs since yesterday and they are from 3 types: DA (hydrogen-rich, most common), DC (helium-rich), DQ (carbon-rich). There should supposedly be as well (and I think I've seen them in-game): DB, DO (both helium-rich), DZ (helium and metal-rich). There should also be a rarest one: neon-magnesium type but I don't know what its designation is. That's probably all of them and I know 7 is not a small amount but they have different properties so they should be different categories in the book.
 

Ender

Ender
Patau82 said:
I think they are just uniformely switched, its just your metal-rich planets don't have 100% metal, I think this is very rare
Click to expand...
This is definitely very rare and I haven't seen it yet - perhaps we need a new category: metal-rich planet with lowest metal content :)
 

Lord_Zapan

Lord_Zapan
Ender said:
Patau, I've been able to find only 16 white dwarfs since yesterday and they are from 3 types: DA (hydrogen-rich, most common), DC (helium-rich), DQ (carbon-rich). There should supposedly be as well (and I think I've seen them in-game): DB, DO (both helium-rich), DZ (helium and metal-rich). There should also be a rarest one: neon-magnesium type but I don't know what its designation is. That's probably all of them and I know 7 is not a small amount but they have different properties so they should be different categories in the book.
Click to expand...

There is also DAB, DAV, DBV and DCV...
 

oroboras

O
Oh, I am going to start using my CMDR name as opposed to my forum username from now on for records.

Old Records;

LARGEST WOLF-RAYET STAR

HIP 113569 WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 9.3853

LIGHTEST WOLF-RAYET STAR

CD-36 11341 WITH 0.6367 SOLAR MASSES

OLDEST WOLF-RAYET STAR

HIP 99982 A AT 10,534 MILLION YEARS

All broken by one star.

LARGEST WOLF-RAYET STAR

CD-23 13397 A WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 9.4367 - CMDR CALBARON

LIGHTEST WOLF-RAYET STAR

CD-23 13397 A WITH 0.4687 SOLAR MASSES - CMDR CALBARON

OLDEST WOLF-RAYET STAR
CD-23 13397 A AT 12,930 MILLION YEARS - CMDR CALBARON
Wolf Rayet.jpg
 
Last edited:

Nuruodo

Nuruodo
I can't believe I made a record-breaking discovery. I'm still a relative newb to the game, this is crazy.

HEAVIEST BLACK HOLE
HD 130298 B WITH 47.0117 SOLAR MASSES
CMDR NURUODO

QyEwzwX.png
 

Nuruodo

Nuruodo
Lord_Zapan said:
Yeah, you shouldn't believe it...

Have you checked the book in the first post ?
Heaviest black hole is 198 solar masses...
Click to expand...
. . . if you're not going to use the damn list then get rid of it entirely. Thank you, OP, thank you so much for making me jump the gun and look like a damn fool.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom