updatedSorry, but hozzdutch did provide a proper evidence here so his record should be reinstated.
updatedSorry, but hozzdutch did provide a proper evidence here so his record should be reinstated.
Officiall announcement:
We of the universall carthographics " The calactic book of records" are happy to announce that we have a new addition to our team, Niddy is helping us now keeping the books up to date.
Officiall announcement:
We of the universall carthographics " The calactic book of records" are happy to anounce that we have a new addition to our team, Niddi is helping us now keep to the books up to date.
A hiphiphoorray to Niddy!
METAL-RICH PLANET WITH LOWEST METAL CONTENT
PW2010 288 A 1 WITH 46.2% CMDR TRAV ELER
@Patau: Do you want to add it?
I probably wouldn't even have realized this category exists if someone had not mentioned it few posts back... anyway
IMAGE LINK
METAL RICH PLANET WITH LOWEST METAL CONTENT
DROJU SO-O D7-10 1 WITH 33.1%
-----
In addition, I could state that DROJU SO-O D7-10 3 has the LIGHTEST CLASS III GAS GIANT being "only" 55 or so earth masses; as the previous record states '7 solar masses' I believe this to be a clerical error, could someone look into it?![]()
The planet you posted is not a Metal Rich planet, but a High Metal Content Planet. The description in the details and in the little tooltip windows are universally switched for these two types.
I was just wondering for the 'most planetary binaries' category, do they have to be direct pairs, or do binaries within binaries count?
SMALLEST Y-TYPE STAR
SYNOOKIO TR-B A99-0 WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.0435
Derp. Stupid game. I've already gotten confused with class II giants having class III giant description... but, err, do we have lowest metal% category for high metal content planets yet, then? Want to add one?![]()