Bob Lighthouse
Banned
So they don't want people in open for their fun --- why then? do tell, I am all ears.
Are you conceding the point I made, or trying to hand-wave it and build a diversion?
So they don't want people in open for their fun --- why then? do tell, I am all ears.
Yes, if you dont like it, dont play it. If you dont like any of the modes, you bought the wrong game. Its not rocket science. FD has clearly said over and over that the very idea of 'griefcondas' killing 'noobwinders' (their words) is totally within the very concept of ED. And no, as people keep explaining to you over and over and over and over again, PP isnt suggested to be 'open only' to 'lure people into Open'. Its done to make the feature work for people in Open. Noone cares if you stay out, or even quit all together.
So do you want bored PvPers to continue to show up at CGs and shoot everything they see? Because that's what's happening right now.
Are you conceding the point I made, or trying to hand-wave it and build a diversion?
The same could be said for the "Doooooom!!!" argument from those who whine about PvP being "meaningful" and PP needing to be moved to Open only.
Oh, but that's "different", right? Changes absolutely have to be made to cater to the PvP crowd!
Everyone here knows the Elite: Dangerous universe is a dystopia?
Riiiiiiiight?
And if it were meant to be completely "lawless" and "anarchistic" there would be no organization of groups or policing forces- just a lot of random NPC's and players shooting at each other.
Of course, that's what you're really after here, isn't it? Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!
Context. It's important.
Now we get reductio ad absurdum - " we have nobody to fight so we come and kill anybody we can find" - that is caused by solo / PG? - Nope, that is caused by fish-in-a-barrel syndrome. If you want fights with other players - organise one.
Now we get reductio ad absurdum - " we have nobody to fight so we come and kill anybody we can find" - that is caused by solo / PG? - Nope, that is caused by fish-in-a-barrel syndrome. If you want fights with other players - organise one.
No I am saying you need to tell me why PvP players want more people in open if it is not to increase their own fun.
I have no idea what point, if any, you are trying to make. But yeah, I do feel its important that every type of player has meaningful content, including explorers, miners, PvE combat, traders and, strangely enough, PvP players. I dont despise any group of players the way you do, so I am happy to see people getting the content they are looking for. Just like I am very pleased with the idea of mining overhaul in Q4, despite me personally not caring much about mining at all.
I already answered from my own perspective.
Why won't you concede the point?
Why do you think it's OK to pigeonhole people?
So after 25 pages on just this thread alone, the final page shows the result...basically this is what popcorn was made for and realistically, this debate never even got off the ground... like every other thread has been on the subject. It will go on another 25 pages and still, fighting like cat and dog and the result wont be much different.
Without Frontiers input, this aint gonna ever be sorted...realistically ^
The point is, telling others they should "not play the game if they don't like the way it is" is just the same as telling those who are discontented with certain aspects of the game from other viewpoints is complete and utter hypocrisy. They should be doing the same, no? "don't like it, don't play it then".
I think you are confused. If you dont like it, you can leave. If I dont like it, I can leave.
But if Sandro dont like it, he can change it. And if you or I dont like it, I refer you to the above statement.![]()
PvPers think PvErs should be their "prey"? Isn't that pigeonholing, too?
For the same reasons PvPer's think PvErs should be their "prey"? Isn't that pigeonholing, too?
Citation required.
The Elite dystopia is all about corporate elites, corrupt governments, trigger-happy law enforcement and galactic scale Machiavellian manuevering - not just anarchy and lawlessness.
That context thing you're on about - I agree, very important.
Um, every forum snipe that has ever referenced others as being their "content"?
Do you need help using the Search system in the forum?
Yes, *you* are pigeonholing right now.
But your responses are generally, totally irrational, so par I say.
LOL yes, let's simply imply that someone else is being "irrational" with their responses because we clearly have nothing better to respond with, shall we?