Handwavium?[weird]
Handwavium?[weird]
No I didnt mean to fight back via PVP. Just try to oppose their actions.
See, that's the downside of a wall. Can you quote the specific part which you're talking about?
Last time I opted the idea of a SysNet added to GalNet which could list influence changes and who is responsible for it. That way you would know.
Would that solve that dilemma?
I am not sure what sysnet is, but if it will show at least who is doing the damage itd a good start, although if they dont belong in a player faction and damaging you in SOLO, there is nothing you can do to stop them.
Be thankful that the BGS and PP are not popular because the amount of salt those activities could generate would put pvp griefing to the side.
So all you are doing is chasing after an indivisible enemy with your BGS. They will always be one step ahead.
Well you've demonstrated that you actually don't understand how the BGS works...
But if you are going to claim that my BGS actions are robberies, may I claim that your griefing PVP actions, that you have admitted to doing, are sexual assaults?
Last edited:
Thought you knew how the BGS worked?
I know how to do this, others know how to do this.
How do you not know when you keep saying you know more than everyone?
If so, then there could be simple logic behind it.
Everybody, multiplayers/PvP-ers included, needs a good and varied PvE environment and strong PvE mechanics to make the game solid and worthwhile.
Only a minority needs PvP mechanics and even then infrequently.
ED without PvE mechanics and only PvP is no game.
ED with only PvE mechanics and no PvP would still be a great spacesim.
Even PvP-ers do more PvE than PvP.
The foundation and priority of the game is/should be PvE.
Last edited:
You dont know crap, like you dont know anything about this game except screaming that the modes are equal.
You csnt even understand a simple mechanic as a lockdown by a turreted boat mawing cops in SOLO. Btw whats the name of your PF?
Yup, remove open or remove PvP - either way works for me
People like Open and of those a minority likes PvP.
That is fine by me, but PvE mechanics and PvE aspects of the game need to be prioritized.
Everybody who plays the game will enjoy that.
Claiming that Jockey doesn't know anything about the game is like saying that a sailor knows nothing about the boat he's been sailing for years.
*Dons metal helmet*
So, today's nuclear bomb of a question: what exactly is the problem with mode-specific content?
Content always has to be developed for specific roles or playstyles. I don't expect to get mined ore when I trade, and I don't expect to get tins of imperial slaves for scanning stars during exploration.
So what is the fundamental objection to Open having content for Open play, for PG to get specific content, and for Solo getting its own content?
It doesn't have to make either "exclusive" or "better". The content for either can have equal effort put into it. For a very basic example, Open-only CZs, or trade missions, that drive a particular objective or growth, and PG also has dedicated missions that cannot be completed in Open.
Technical matter aside the above has always been shut down "because all game modes are valid", but if the content is effectively equal on either side, it's not stating that either is more valid - simply acknowledging that different players have different needs.
In a nutshell it caters more to everyone, so unless I am missing something, the only objection would be founded on...well, not wanting other people to have fun. Now there's a turn up for the books
Go.
1: there's a ton's of threads on this, read those instead of starting a new?
2: because why would there be? there is absolutely no difference in open other then being able to play with random other people with the advantages and disadvantages this brings?
Are you his personal spokesman?
Because the devs have created a game that is entirely based on the PVP tug of war between PVE groups, outcollecting PVE trophies. By blocking PVE trophy collection from people who have personal preferences to trophy collect with friends or alone, you are immediately removing their enjoyment of the game.
Last edited:
Neither. Because we're playing a computer game.
As a test of bravery, anything I can do whilst sitting on my backside in my spare room sipping a beer isn't actually setting any criteria against which a judgement can be made. It's pretty funny that some people seem to think otherwise.
Ah, excellent. Then you acknowledge how useless PvP is in relation to the BGS?
Its not. Otherwise people wouldn't be min maxing in SOLO purposely to affect the BGS. From some unknown reason SOLO undermining both in PP and BGS is a common occurrence. I wonder why this happens if not to avoid direct PvP opposition.
Doesn't matter. All that matters is how the game was designed.