I think people do tend to forget that making DLCs also costs money and that financially a port to console alone is a safer financial ROI than making new DLCs is. You need both less people to do a port and fewer types of dev profiles than you need to make new DLCs.
If they decide not to do more packs alongside the console release then it won't be strange or weird, but it will be because it was financially the better option.
You are high-key awesome at coming up with fun pack ideas, names, and descriptions. Haha. This would be fantastic! Though I feel like 2 animals might be more realistic... 3 feels way more "balanced." Maybe 2 habitat plus 1 exhibit instead of 3 habitat?I don’t think leaving the pieces in a separate pack is a good idea, like how would you even market that to get peoples attention? I would do 3 animals and 75-100 pieces for 5 bucks.
Example:
Tranquility Pack
Discover spring in a different light by exploring nature as it is and as it should be. Watch the blossoms grow and see the colours brighten with the Planet Zoo: Tranquility Pack!
Take a walk through the meadows and fields of spring and discover 3 new species; the adorable European Hare, the majestic Mallard, and the powerfully prancing Blackbuck!
View attachment 387853
Alongside this pack, you will have access to over 80+ new spring themed pieces including a variety of new flowers, vines, trees as well as a few new construction pieces like new wooden turbines, walls and more!
And, y'know, you might be right about needing the animals to push scenery. Even if it's just a few...
I'm assuming folks will consider this blasphemy because I'm excluding the greater rhea and spectacled bear but for me...Short survey. What are the 5 most important animals in South America that are still missing? Which ones should definitely be added?
Black howler monkey, ocelot, coati, golden lion tamarin, and macaws. Bush dog get my "if we won't ever get flighted birds let me replace it with this" slot. Hah. I may also say scarlet ibis or a spoonbill on a given day...