LOL, CIG spent untold effort making everything persist, then aggressively clean up persisted items.
PES declutter is clearly needed in landing zones and other high traffic areas, however it should preferably be run with a very light touch, mostly not at all, in unpopulated areas. As it is now,...
robertsspaceindustries.com
More Tony/Quanta discussion
As a backer who has been here from the beginning, I am not so sure anymore how many original backers are still lingering around or if their numbers are still relevant to funding but if they are...
robertsspaceindustries.com
While I understand that NPCs may be hard to implement
No! They are not hard to implement. Games have been implementing NPCs with at least half a brain for decades now. I was writing scripts for Neverwinter Nights 2 NPCs almost 20 years ago, giving them schedules, reacting to players, etc, and it wasn't really mega complicated code. Just a bunch of conditions and triggers.
ChatJ3PT living in their own world again
Nothing about the vision for 1.0 is a compromise. It's the original vision with even more on top of it, so it's delivering on more than the original vision making it the complete opposite of a compromise.
LOL
Hell, he's all over that thread trying to recon history and defend CIG.
I really don't know where some of you get off just making things up and misrepresenting the actual plans.
Says the man who constantly does that.
Someone pushes back
And beyond that, you have a fundamental problem with your attitude. The way you interact with people is just bottom-tier. You don’t debate, you don’t argue in good faith—you just assume everyone who disagrees with you is either too stupid to understand, willfully misrepresenting things, or acting with some shady ulterior motive. It’s exhausting. It doesn’t strengthen your position, it just makes it unbearable to engage with you.
But you? You don’t leave room for that. You don’t argue, you accuse. You don’t discuss, you attack. And that’s why talking to you isn’t a debate—it’s a chore. Instead of engaging with what people are actually saying, you immediately assume bad faith and start swinging wildly. And the worst part? It completely undermines whatever valid points you do have. No one wants to sift through layers of hostility and paranoia just to maybe find something worthwhile in what you’re saying.
And does he acknlowedge any of this or say he could do better engaging with people?
You make very clear that you are disregarding all evidence and information available in favour of feelings and vitriol. Which makes it pointless engaging with you.
What you said was false and actively contradicting what they said and their plans and you have nothing with any substance to back up or justify it. You're making excuses and deflecting with emotionally driven arguments to try and cover for that but it is very clear to see.
Just the same old deflect, distract and discredit at this point with all of you. Nothing constructive, very little that's accurate, very little regard for the truth and nothing of substance.
Ah, no, same old attitude.
Overall, this is the saltiest i've seen Spectrum ever.
www.linkedin.com
