Another Raxxla Theory Bites The Dust:
"...the jewel that burns on the brow of the mother of galaxies" has always seemed to me to be the closest thing we have to a
meaningful clue. Everything else seems impossibly vague and open-ended.
I loved loved
loved the theory that the "
jewel that burns" is a star, "
on the brow" is literally the brow of one of the constellations / asterism characters, and
"mother of galaxies" identifies which character, thus identifying one specific star in all the heavens with just a single poetic line. Breathtaking!
Not only that, but the puzzle aspect of picking a star out of a real-world ancient constellation star atlas and mapping that to its actual star in the game is a fantastic activity and a
masterpiece of game puzzle design. Whoever came up with that deserves a pay raise!
So if this
isn't how the line is supposed to be interpreted, then someone at FDev really dropped the ball, and since Raxxla is still hidden, FDev needs to retroactively fix that mistake!
Anyway, I digress. The strongest candidate character for "mother of galaxies" has seemed to be Cassiopeia, because she is a well-established constellation that is the mother of Andromeda, the biggest and most naked-eye visible galaxy in the sky (other than our own Milky Way). Perfect match! The problem is that she's not really depicted with a circlet, crown, or other kind of jewel in her brow. And more to the point, visiting stars in her brow doesn't seem to have uncovered anything, at least not anything obvious.
So I was looking for alternative candidates. I focused on the "galax
ies" part - it's plural. Andromeda is one galaxy. The only galaxy
cluster I know of that is naked-eye visible is the virgo supercluster... and virgo is a constellation asterism of a woman - either a maiden/virgin, or sometimes the virgin Mary, so in some sense NOT a mother, but in other senses, potentially.
There aren't a lot of bright (naked-eye visible) stars around her brow, so I visited the three best candidates (3, 2, and 1 VIR, from memory, with 3 being the best candidate), and it was a bust. Strangely, all of them were empty systems; one star, nothing else, not even a belt. Two stars, nothing else. Two stars and a gas giant. Nothing interactable. All systems were close enough to the bubble to have degraded emissions.
There are some other stars in the head vicinity, so this isn't a proof, but the other stars are more squint-with-binoculars, not jewels burning bright.
So this virgin-mother theory is (probably) a bust.
So... Who else is "mother of galaxies", preferably someone often depicted with a headpiece?