Of course. No one is questioning that ^. Certainly not i.
But if say i were truly onto something legit & solid ( with RAXXLA ) , and i absolutely knew it 99.9% was correct on-track, i just wouldn't come posting anything in public forums at all UNTIL i actually had the shareable proof, data, steps-to-reproduce, etc. for to assist the proverbial greater good.
Eh, this particular thread is full of speculation because it's actually huge part of work involved in solving anything here - you basically have to speculate, bounce those ideas off other people, perhaps other people get involved (or not), and maybe nothing comes out of it but negative results are also results. I don't want to get into judging anybody's character here, and I see zero point in gatekeeping this thread in any way other than perhaps "stay on topic". People have their way of doing things, and it may not line up with your notion of how things should be done, and there is nothing wrong with either side. It's not a job you're paying them to do.
This leapt out at me while I was researching NGC 7822 last night. It probably is an error but still, it's worth noting.
View attachment 418089
source: https://elite-dangerous.fandom.com/wiki/NGC_7822
Yes, and no. 2MASS survey covered the ENTIRE sky. The fact that we have a handful of strings of stars here and there is not a coincidence or an error - it was specifically, on purpose handpicked to accomplish specific goals. If you visit Orion Nebula, it will become painfully obvious just how hand-crafted the whole place is, and largely why.
I suspect somewhat similar revelation with NGC 7822. Yes, the stars are obviously aligned, they may have been distributed slightly differently before, but I suspect that if anything, it's a correction to make things clearer than anything else. It's a very well trekked location (just like Orion Nebula - there is not a single spot you can leave your name on left in there, despite how annoying it is to get in there - or maybe because), I'm fairly sure any changes are premeditated.