Don’t forget the toe claws!So female wolverines have two claws. Got it.
Don’t forget the toe claws!So female wolverines have two claws. Got it.
they wont its not a good business model the packs being so diverse means there is at least one reason for you to buy the pack while taxonomic pack would appeal to a much smaller number of playersLast year, when we only got 2 DLCs for the first time due to the situation at Frontier I thought about how cool it would be if Frontier would release little bonus packs inbetween which deliever 3 to 4 animals of the same taxonomic group for let's say 5,99 € or so which would only require little changes of the model but could use the same rigs and animations, like a
a) Duck Pack: Mallard, Mandarin, White Whistling, Wood
b) Deer Pack: Marsh Deer, Samba Deer, Pier David's...
c) Penguin Pack: Rockhopper, Humboldt, Gentoo
d) Waterfowl Pack: Canada Goose, Hawaii Goose, Grey, Diepholz
e) Tamarin/Marmoset Pack: Golden Lion, Emperor, Common Marmoset...
f) Goat/Sheep Pack: African Dwarf, Camerun Sheep, Angola
g) Pheasant Pack:....
h) Crane Pack:...
The list could go on and on. Even bear or rhino packs would be possible without causing the discussion if another rhino, bear of fox would take an important spot from the regular DLCs. I would really like such packs, because tbh if we are lucky we will maybe get one more duck species and packs like this would offer the opportunity to feel big gaps at once and of course the opportunity for eveyone to choose, which roster you want to fill up.
I'm not sure we'd want to see the female version of Hugh Jackman.What if the Wolverine doesn't have sexual dimorphism
Look at Marvel and DC. A lot of Marvel movies are sloppy. Competition won't necessarily help.We need another zoo game that will beat the crap out of Planet Zoo and bring competition. Without another zoo game, it allows Planet Zoo to do any snobby job it believes it can do.
Saying Marvel and DC are competitors in the 21st century is like saying Mario and Sonic are competitors in the 21st century. Very true in the past, but clearly one side won out in the modern day and the other's just doing its own thing now.Look at Marvel and DC. A lot of Marvel movies are sloppy. Competition won't necessarily help.
Honestly, agreed. A lot of PZ’s “competition” leans way more towards management from what I can tell, so it’d be nice to see another dev throw their hat into the ring with something more building-heavy.We need another zoo game that will beat the crap out of Planet Zoo and bring competition. Without another zoo game, it allows Planet Zoo to do any snobby job it believes it can do.
I feel like a cartoony themed game would really hit the parks with Cartoony but Realistic looking animals.Honestly, agreed. A lot of PZ’s “competition” leans way more towards management from what I can tell, so it’d be nice to see another dev throw their hat into the ring with something more building-heavy.
Also, probably a very hot take, but if said hypothetical PZ competitor were to give their animals/overall game a more stylized look so they could really mass-produce those suckers and load their game with as many cool species as possible, that would be cool with me… in fact, that would be a plus for me (and probably nobody else lol).
Depends on how long youve been gone. Already know about the new dlc teased last week?wow many pages, what did I miss? and why 2 more thread for 2 more dlcs?
wow many pages, what did I miss? and why 2 more thread for 2 more dlcs?
Just as add-ons in between the regular DLCs I think it would work. It wouldn't efford a lot of man-power to bring out these little packs and could make the company some extra money.they wont its not a good business model the packs being so diverse means there is at least one reason for you to buy the pack while taxonomic pack would appeal to a much smaller number of players
And it really works. I´m not too excited yet for the new DLC, but if they put a bird in it I´ll have to get it anyways...they wont its not a good business model the packs being so diverse means there is at least one reason for you to buy the pack while taxonomic pack would appeal to a much smaller number of players
Think of it this way: I’m into cats, you’re into deer, and let’s say Topaz is into birds. If the DLCs were organised by animal type (one for cats, one for deer, one for birds) each of us would most likely only buy the one we care about, so they'd make €18 total. But if they mix the animals (one cat, one deer, and one bird in each DLC) then the three of us would have to buy all three DLCs, and they’d make €54 from the same players and the exact same animals. Like last dlc i bought it for the ocelote coyote and bush dog if you had put 2 more monkeys and another bird in that dlc i would skip itJust as add-ons in between the regular DLCs I think it would work. It wouldn't efford a lot of man-power to bring out these little packs and could make the company some extra money.
Wait, there's a new DLC?Depends on how long youve been gone. Already know about the new dlc teased last week?
I mean yeah, but sometimes competition doesn't immediately mean better qualitySaying Marvel and DC are competitors in the 21st century is like saying Mario and Sonic are competitors in the 21st century. Very true in the past, but clearly one side won out in the modern day and the other's just doing its own thing now.
Yeah, looking like an Asia central pack with honey badger and lion tailed macaque (and another elephant seemingly).Wait, there's a new DLC?
We are getting the indian elephant. Again.wow many pages, what did I miss? and why 2 more thread for 2 more dlcs?
Or the Sri Lankan (OR the Sumatran).We are getting the indian elephant. Again.
I know, I was acting as if I'm late to the newsYeah, looking like an Asia central pack with honey badger and lion tailed macaque (and another elephant seemingly).
That makes me happyWe are getting the indian elephant. Again.
I'd rather the Indian elephantOr the Sri Lankan (OR the Sumatran).