Peregrina has already an affected station, so it seems UA have already been sold there.
For what it's worth, this one in particular has me very intrigued....
Peregrina has already an affected station, so it seems UA have already been sold there.
No need to be pedantic. There is a quite common chemical corrosion reaction involving water called rust![]()
I knew/hoped you'd say that
I am literally throwing rep at the screen (because I'm out of the 'real' thing)![]()
For what it's worth, this one in particular has me very intrigued....
And why?
Btw I forgot to mention that also Vizcaino Enterpraise in Nganji is affected, so it seems someone did already try to take some UA to Palin: not being able to sell them to Christian Dock directly, for lack of Black Market, they tried to sell them to Vizcaino instead.
Another piece that goes in place, about the UA being the cause...
As Michael said, we can cure the stations 'soon'. This probably means that we don't have access to the necessary remedies yet.
In 1.5/2.0 there are a bunch of new commodities (spoiler): https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=200463
Inn addition there are materials in 2.0.
Synthesizing materials is a big part of 2.0. Our ships and SRVs have recipes for this. For example, there are recipes for repairing your SRV (I will not list them).
I would not be surprised if a similar approach is needed to cure the stations.
We can not sell materials to stations, so we need to find commodities/rares that have similar content.
For example if we need phosphorus for a repair recipe, we could deliver 'HIP Organophosphates' to the station.
Pure speculation so far. I just have a feeling the the recipes are important. This feeling is reinforced by the Master Chef story and it's focus on recipes.
Mostly because Peregrina experiencing issues feels too... well... obvious.
It's unique with it's permit and plague-world, and it's proximity to the shell suggested they may be related. Anything to do with the UA's affecting stations would've first kicked in at Peregrina if they were related.
I know "not everything is about the UA's", but Peregrina always felt related. Talos 2 becoming affected just feels suspicious.
MB saying we can stop it spreading now means we can stop selling them to stations.
MB saying 'soon' to my question about a cure means new materials coming with the next season.
So I was expecting it. What I was not expecting is your target system not being affected: but this supports the theory that FD choses systems also according to what people are talking about, perhaps.
Somewhere I can hear MB mumbling... all right, that's it... GET ME THAT DATABASE INTERN UP HERE... You, find that damned station this idiot's been selling to. [Really starts to mumble] Maybe this should be the first station to go...
Could be, but coupled with his previous "science needs to be done" comment, I'd be very disappointed if there wasn't something we could do at this time. And as others have pointed out, preventing EVERYBODY EVERYWHERE from selling UAs isn't exactly viable, so if that was what MB's remark meant, then, yes, I'd be very disappointed.
No. He very specifically said we can "stop it spreading". He said nothing about curing currently infected stations. I think his wording is probably very deliberate and quite important.
You don't want to analyse his words? So we just assume whatever meaning suits us and go with it? That is not scientific.
You say that stopping the spread will cure the stations. What are you basing that on (i.e. what's your reasoning)?
We certainly could try to stop people selling them. It's unlikely to be effective, but it's not impossible.
Edit: nevermind, I see he's clarified (making my point correct but redundant
I had to catch up two days of threadnaugt, and with MB appearance that's 15 pages :O
Anyway, MB said we can stop it spreading.
That means no cure at the time (as he said shortly after).
I interpret this also as several possibilities, :
A- The spread is the UAs infecting new stations
B- The spread is the degrading state of a station, aka the whole process of a station going shut down.
C- A combination of the two above
I think that solving point A- is pretty straightforward, but as said earlier, we can't control players will to sell UAs.
For solving point B- however, we need more data : how fast do a station go down ?
We already know the two subsquent symptoms of an infection :
- Station is reported suffering mysterious malfunctions.
- Station is shutting down services (commodities, outfitting, etc)
We also have a pretty solid opinion (true or not ?) on how the stations are choosen for being infected :
- Commanders are publicly reporting selling UA's to that station's BM
- We do have some hints that FD can look at BM's logs for the UA sales
- FD is picking stations to go malfunctiunning from the two above criteria.
What i don't recall reading, is the chronology of an infection.
I mean from the public statement that we sell UA to a station's BM, to the galnet report saying the station is suffering mysterious malfunctions and finally to the station service shut down.
Do anyone paid attention to this chronology ?
TL;DR : we need to find out how long a station stay in these four states : UA sales to it, GalNet Malfunctions, GalNet shut down, Ingame shutdown.
Because MB said we can stop it spreading.
And we do did some extensive tests at Bond Hub.
And finally, since we don't know how long a station is taking to be shutted down, we actually don't know if we manage to stop the spreading in Bond Hub.
Have we sold Scientific Research at Bond or one of the other infected stations?
Peregrina has already an affected station, so it seems UA have already been sold there.
I support the Palin thing instead: he is in Christian Dock in the NGANJI system, but there is no black market in his station...
https://community.elitedangerous.com/galnet/uid/562dfb949657ba7166c8185b