The Star Citizen Thread v 4

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
And Chris said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith in my full vision as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, refactor hence to yonder place; and it shall refactor; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

And Chris waved his hands. And it was good.

brillant!:)
 
See, this is why the inner circles of the SC fandom is perceived as kind of a cult by outsiders:

http://i.imgur.com/cPIy7Gt.png

It's like, whatever the bad news is, there's always something to tell yourself so you don't have to internalize the bad news as bad. Even if it's grasping for straws like "every dev company is behind schedule".




You are taking things out of context. Nobody said that. And you didn't even bother to read the original question. Reported.

I know that reading comprehension is not a very common skill in this thread, but... did you missed the last few hundred pages of people calling it a scam, how SC will fail, almost as if they wish that would happen?

Now a TOS deadline is a thing here. Info for you, that is another part of Smarts Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt campaign. No even outside of the Smartie circle even cares about that.
 
I know that reading comprehension is not a very common skill in this thread, but... did you missed the last few hundred pages of people calling it a scam, how SC will fail, almost as if they wish that would happen?

Now a TOS deadline is a thing here. Info for you, that is another part of Smarts Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt campaign. No even outside of the Smartie circle even cares about that.

Source your quotes.
 
I know that reading comprehension is not a very common skill in this thread, but... did you missed the last few hundred pages of people calling it a scam, how SC will fail, almost as if they wish that would happen?

Now a TOS deadline is a thing here. Info for you, that is another part of Smarts Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt campaign. No even outside of the Smartie circle even cares about that.

so? a million people calling it a scam doesn't matter 1 bit, because the development of the game is hunky dory. Unless it isn't. They will have a epic game to show us doubters wrong. Again with smart lol who cares about that. TOS thing is real and I look forward to seeing how its dealt with tbh.

How does a man with no interaction with the development interact with the game? Or the TOS that cig made? So they have to provide financial information about the kickstarted funded game. how dare DS make them do what they said.
 
Last edited:
No even outside of the Smartie circle even cares about that.

You obviously care, deeply enough to post generalised insults about it.

If the ToS expiry is nothing, then you get to be happy. The lights stay on at CiG tomorrow, people look at the person making the most noise about it with a more critical eye in the future.
What could possibly go wrong?

You should be happy this is being made public, so that when it is a complete non-event you have another piece of data to show when demonstrating your belief in CiG's ability to finish the game (or games).
 
Folks, it's simple.

We can agree and disagree about things, that's all fine. But collective insults aimed at people in this forum like "They are that stupid"? You bet I'm reporting that. Don't act like your personal freedoms have been infringed. And don't try to make it look like I reported this post because he "didn't answer my question".

Get back to discussing Star Citizen. Even if we completely disagree about fundamental things, it's no excuse to resort to insults.

Yes and I stand by my assertion. Basically most of the people are jumping from: It must be a scam, they are criminals, they game will never be completed, it is all a cheap hack, back to it is a scam.

Jumping around in circles, congratulating each other how edgy you are. Yes, definitely stupid. The general tone here is just one step above the SA forums were folks had fantasies about mass suicides of SC backers once the project collapses. That is also hardly surprising as a number of posters were also regular posters in this specific thread.

Ask yourself: If SC would be on the verge of collapse. What would be the point of this entire smear campaign? The Smarties could just sit back and wait for it to happen, but what they actually do is go to various game forums, make wild accusations.

They are not all stupid, but the ones who take their stuff as face value. Yes they are, very much so.

Edit:

I am out here. Thiis part of the E : D community is not worth talking to.
 
Last edited:
I know that reading comprehension is not a very common skill in this thread, but... did you missed the last few hundred pages of people calling it a scam, how SC will fail, almost as if they wish that would happen?

Now a TOS deadline is a thing here. Info for you, that is another part of Smarts Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt campaign. No even outside of the Smartie circle even cares about that.

Whilst I was waiting for my coffee I searched this thread for "scam" - roughly 92 posts - a lot of which are by supporters claiming detractors are calling it a scam when the vast majority of us are not and many other of those 92 are people quoting the original post.

Almost no-one is actually saying they think it's a deliberate scam rather than a horribly miss-managed but genuine attempt to make a game.

ETA - I can't see anyone in here seriously saying they are actually on the verge of collapse either. It feels like you're reading stuff elsewhere and then replying as though it's been said here.
 
Last edited:
so? a million people calling it a scam doesn't matter 1 bit, .

A million? LOL!

Currently there are 1,386,595 citizen, if a million of them would be angry on cig i belive we would see that.

Sry bro, but the mighty "sc attack force" army is currently just a very very very neat minority.

Dont make something up, currently we are far far far away from doom.

:D :D
 
Last edited:
Yes and I stand by my assertion. Basically most of the people are jumping from: It must be a scam, they are criminals, they game will never be completed, it is all a cheap hack, back to it is a scam.

Jumping around in circles, congratulating each other how edgy you are. Yes, definitely stupid. The general tone here is just one step above the SA forums were folks had fantasies about mass suicides of SC backers once the project collapses. That is also hardly surprising as a number of posters were also regular posters in this specific thread.

Ask yourself: If SC would be on the verge of collapse. What would be the point of this entire smear campaign? The Smarties could just sit back and wait for it to happen, but what they actually do is go to various game forums, make wild accusations.

They are not all stupid, but the ones who take their stuff as face value. Yes they are, very much so.

your posts reflect a serious unhappiness with DS and sa forums and I cant fix that. But lets talk about the issues that cloud this game. The financials in the tos. this is a good thing? to see how your money is being spent. I don't see a problem with anyone having this, as it would shut up critics or reassure fans of the game.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

A million? LOL!

Currently there are 1,386,595 citizen, if a million of them would be angry on cig i belive we would see that.

Sry bro, but the mighty "sc attack force" army is currently just a very very very neat minority.

Dont make something up, currently we are far far far away from doom.

:D :D

are u kidding me. well I'm sorry you took my words at literal face value. we tend to use a million as lots. sorry I didn't write it in a way that mistranslated. Besides that's not how it was written. I could use trillions the fact remains until they show a worth while game backer interest is going to get interesting. Way to twist words and quote them.
 
Last edited:
In the early days certain LTI ships were selling at close to 300% markup. You are talking massive sums of money. That's why I don't trust SC 'White Knights' there are so many possible conflicts of interest both financial and emotional that just isn't an issue in any 'normal' crowdfunded game. I judge the game by its delays, content delivery and divergence from original vision as any crowdfunded game should be judged.
You see same thing in other forum contexts where financial assets are traded, like stock trading forums. Once the money flows, the fun stops. There are too many people involved with Star Citizen, who are not interested in video games nor space sims and you can clearly tell them apart from genuine enthusiasts (like Scott Manley).

Ironically this perfectly fits CR's "evil publisher" narrative of "greedy guys in suits" allegedly ruining video games. It's very clear that CIG tailors their product towards this shady clientèle, because its benefits them financially. So for people just interested in playing space video games, it negatively affects the game itself, the community and of course the communication about it. You can't go anywhere except some pay-to-post comedy forum, without being drowned in "pushing".
 
are u kidding me. well I'm sorry you took my words at literal face value. we tend to use a million as lots. sorry I didn't write it in a way that mistranslated. Besides that's not how it was written. I could use trillions the fact remains until they show a worth while game backer interest is going to get interesting. Way to twist words and quote them.

Then iam sorry too for this missunderstanding,it is hard to differ, since some would really belive that.
 
Last edited:
Then iam sorry too for this missunderstanding,it is hard to differ, since some would really belive that.

That's ok mate. I understand that English is not first language for many. Way I wrote it was very colloquial in English. But I don't want this to distract that the TOS is up and I don't care about refunds. What I want to know are people going to ask for actual financial information they promised in it?
 
Last edited:
I think it's a little bit of a stretch to use delays as evidence that a game is in trouble or a scam. There are plenty of examples of great games that had delays. Most recently, No Man's Sky has had a delay and people lost their minds over as little a delay as two months. I'm still hopeful it will be a great game. Some times studios just need extra time.
 
I personally enjoy the flight mechanics. Ships still need more of a sense of mass, but that's difficult without making them feel too weighty. Supposedly ship components (such as the engine) will add mass, so we'll see if that dials it where it needs to be.

The inevitable comparison comes to ED's roll-to-yaw FM. I've got about 500 hours in ED, and I think I still prefer the SC FM just because some ships "feel" different than others. ED ships do have a distinctive character, but sometimes it feels forced, like the DBE and the DBS. Similar chassis, but pretty drastically different flight behavior, though it feels to me more like "one has a slower pitch" instead of "the tail likes to kick out when you punch it and turn".

That's my take. Honestly, I've been spending more time in ED as of late trying to fly a Vulture using a Samsung GearVR that I'm using as a poor-man's Oculus.

EDIT - Hit the post button before I realized I still hadn't answered the rest of your questions, give me a sec...

Do I think it's compelling when people expected it to be closer to a true sim? Not really sure what you mean by that, seems like a bit of a leading question.

If you mean that it should be more realistic, I feel like it is pretty realistic. It's a pretty solid 3rd-order Newtonian flight model, and you can definitely feel the thrusters pushing the ship around. I bookmarked a video a little while ago that I feel like captured this pretty well (though the first minute and 45 seconds is just Cruise jousting and can be skipped):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ueC0CVwypo

I think one thing absolutely critical to the flight model though is the sound execution. If the thrusters rumble around you as the ship moves and corrects rotation or drift, it feels a lot more realistic than it would otherwise. One concern for me in SC currently is that some ships seem to have much better audio cues than others. Maybe it's just the new headphones I bought, but in that video the ship seems to have more substance than I'm used to. Or maybe it's because I'm not flying it, if that makes any sense.

A lot of people who play SC enjoy the way the Gladius handles; personally I can't stand it. It feels like you're driving a pickup on ice. I'd rather fly a 325a, though many other players would consider that a sub-standard combat ship. They both have pretty unique flight characteristics, and some people have very different preferences based upon those characteristics.

I'd be very interested in the perspective of someone who can't stand SC's flight model. I've heard some people say they hate it, but I've never really understood what the reasoning was.

Thx for the answer.....My opinion about FM didn't change at all from the very first day that CIG released DFM aKa AC until today and I honestly believe that FM are essentially the same now.Sure I admit there was some minor tweaks here and there for this half of decade and overall it does feel a bit more polished but that doesn't change the fact that still feels just wrong as they did from day 1.For me it was always that feeling like I been playing an actual FPS and that "someone"just glued an Cockpit picture all over my screen...It's just Twitchy,jerky fast-paced mess where ships lacks so much in their mass that's beyond of unreal....It's like that someone been forcing me to play an arcade game on the same way as I usually do when I play Simulation...and that's just feels so wrong.
I don't believe anything anymore that comes from the CIG mouth as they gamble all my thrust long time ago but I still want them to make this game even if it's going to be just mediocre or average and not the game what was originally pitched....At this moment I rather play SC from the 3rd person view(ARCADE STYLE-as it is) because at least like that I can enjoy the very nice GFX and the current ART which I still finding very amusing....
 
Last edited:
Yes and I stand by my assertion. Basically most of the people are jumping from: It must be a scam, they are criminals, they game will never be completed, it is all a cheap hack, back to it is a scam.

Jumping around in circles, congratulating each other how edgy you are. Yes, definitely stupid. The general tone here is just one step above the SA forums were folks had fantasies about mass suicides of SC backers once the project collapses. That is also hardly surprising as a number of posters were also regular posters in this specific thread.

Ask yourself: If SC would be on the verge of collapse. What would be the point of this entire smear campaign? The Smarties could just sit back and wait for it to happen, but what they actually do is go to various game forums, make wild accusations.

They are not all stupid, but the ones who take their stuff as face value. Yes they are, very much so.

Edit:

I am out here. Thiis part of the E : D community is not worth talking to.



Aww, going away so soon after joining? What's the matter? Not being totally subservient to Mr Roberts enough for your liking?

Because so far, the vast majority of the salient points being made on this thread are being made by folks who have genuine concerns about what the "vision" of Chris Roberts is when put up against the actual reality of what's been produced so far.

So, continue to push the myth that folks here are being "unfair" to Chris Roberts and CiG. That we are just a bunch of acolytes of a largely failed gaming developer who is taking pot shots at someone who is more "successful" than he is. That we are just here to slam without thought or reason, Star Citizen and the people working on it.


I'm sure that will make you feel better, not withstanding the fact that it is almost certainly ill-founded and silly.
 
Last edited:
I think it's a little bit of a stretch to use delays as evidence that a game is in trouble or a scam. There are plenty of examples of great games that had delays. Most recently, No Man's Sky has had a delay and people lost their minds over as little a delay as two months. I'm still hopeful it will be a great game. Some times studios just need extra time.

Delayed games are not always in serious trouble, but games in serious trouble are always delayed.

No Mans Sky have announced (before the date was due) that they are delaying the game, they've explained why (they want to polish it more). People have gone internet crazy about it but frankly I'm not concerned. It's happened once and they've communicated the delay, how long the delay will be for and why there's a delay. Two months is not a big deal.

Star Citizen has sailed past every date with no word from CIG, other than the chairman complaining that backers had the gall to expect him to keep his word. No communication about the delay, it's duration or why it was delayed. Just sulking by the man himself. The original release date was in 2014 that's two years ago, that's a big deal. The third version of the TOS has the latest delivery date for star citizen as midnight tonight a little over eight hours from where I am. Again no word from CIG that's a big deal. They just dropped out of E3 whilst saying they were far too busy, that's a big deal.

NMS is fine and thinking of quality, CIG is in full on panic mode (and if they're not they really should be).
 
Last edited:
I think it's a little bit of a stretch to use delays as evidence that a game is in trouble or a scam. There are plenty of examples of great games that had delays. Most recently, No Man's Sky has had a delay and people lost their minds over as little a delay as two months. I'm still hopeful it will be a great game. Some times studios just need extra time.





Well the thing is with No Man's Sky, this is pretty much the first major-ish delay that they have had during the entire time they've made the game. With Star Citizen it's just *another* one to put on top of a litany of other delays, missed deadlines and other problems with it.

Most folks are very, very confident that come the revised release date for No Man's Sky arrives, that the game will come out there and then. The same sort of assuredness can *not* be made with Star Citizen though, just going on past history.
 
See, this is why the inner circles of the SC fandom is perceived as kind of a cult by outsiders:

http://i.imgur.com/cPIy7Gt.png

It's like, whatever the bad news is, there's always something to tell yourself so you don't have to internalize the bad news as bad. Even if it's grasping for straws like "every dev company is behind schedule".

That's "The 7 Stages of Grief" syndrome.....And usaually when we lost something or someone that we "loved" then we must go through the folowing 7 Stages:
1)SHOCK & DENIAL 2)PAIN & GUILT 3)ANGER & BARGAINING 4)"DEPRESSION", REFLECTION, LONELINESS 5)THE UPWARD TURN 6)RECONSTRUCTION & WORKING THROUGH 7)ACCEPTANCE & HOPE

The things is that some individuals (as from your post above)get locked on certain stage and refuse to proceed on the next one......I believe that I was locked for long on num.3 but soon after I take a brake from anything that have to do with SC in period of 6 months I felt that part of depression&loneliness...Now I am at the upward turn and I started to adjust to life without SC....:D
 
Last edited:
Delayed games are not always in serious trouble, but games in serious trouble are always delayed.

No Mans Sky have announced (before the date was due) that they are delaying the game, they've explained why (they want to polish it more). People have gone internet crazy about it but frankly I'm not concerned. It's happened once and they've communicated the delay, how long the delay will be for and why there's a delay. Two months is not a big deal.

Star Citizen has sailed past every date with no word from CIG, other than the chairman complaining that backers had the gall to expect him to keep his word. No communication about the delay, it's duration or why it was delayed. Just sulking by the man himself. The original release date was in 2014 that's two years ago, that's a big deal. The third version of the TOS has the latest delivery date for star citizen as midnight tonight a little over eight hours from where I am. Again no word from CIG that's a big deal. They just dropped out of E3 whilst saying they were far too busy, that's a big deal.

NMS is fine and thinking of quality, CIG is in full on panic mode (and if they're not they really should be).

Well said. I could add that technically what's been delivered is lacking to put it mildly. I find it odd that basic platform systems are broken while they're preoccupied with putting a shop in the game.

To be somewhat fair, I can see a situation where this would make sense (due to complexity of implementation of one system before another).

I'd have also expected that a lot of the foundation SQ42 is stepping on will come from SC. If SC has such a poor platform .. then surely SQ42 can't be much farther ahead?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom