It's that Saxon big-bladder gene making itself known, that's all…I also understand that there are cultural differences between posters. We do sarcasm and taking the pee in a big way in the UK (back me up guys). Not every country does.
Perhaps he is, but the thing is, do you think the original crowdfunding campaign would have taken off nearly as well as it has without Chris Roberts' name attached to it? Imagine how it would have looked if it were started by people without such a brand, without a history in space sims. For reference, you can check how much other space sims crowdfunded campaigns have made (excl. Elite: Dangerous, since that had David Braben behind it).
Of course, if Star Citizen should fail, that'll also be on Mr. Roberts. Not "evil publishers", not Derek Smart, not evil journalists, and so on: nobody has as much control nor influence over CIG as Chris Roberts does.
That's kind of the funny thing about the whole DSmart part of the story: the fact that he's the big satan whose mere existence (somehow) jeopardises the entire project rests on thing — that Chris proclaimed it was so. In deciding to blame Derek for pretty much everything ever in his letter to The Escapist, Chris empowered Derek with a degree of credibility as a threat and a critic that his long-winded whining and grand-standing could never have done on its own.
Even setting aside the astounding tone-deafness of the letter, it's really messaging 101. Spending that much time and effort on introducing a person and blaming them for everything in relation to a piece where they were previously not even mentioned, will only ever be interpreted in one way: that this person matters to you, a lot. It's Amy's Baking Company levels of doing it wrong, and just like with those guys, I have a sneaky suspicion that Chris will never understand that this, too, was something of his own making.
The funny thing is, regardless of whether the project will succeed or not, in my opinion it would already be a pretty good basis for a play. You know, "any resemblances to real persons are completely unintended" et cetera.
…or better yet, a proper journalistic exposé, similar to Conspiracy of Fools (read this book — it's great), if nothing else because I think there might be an awful lot of overlap in the historical narrative.