That's possibly a tinsy bit harsh.
He could simply be so incompetent that he really doesn't know, and the fact that CIG only seemed to realise they needed a plan for 3.0 at the end of the month CR routinely gave for 'delivery' doesn't suggest a high level of competence.
Or he could just be fully delusional and so really believes his own narrative.
I'm not saying these alternatives are much more palatable, but.....
Still, as a cheery aside, didn't they say that after a January spent planning they'd have a firm date for 3.0, or is this another one of their mutable deliveries?
It is harsh but it's probably not far off the truth. If you're incompetent and you get called out for it you tend to make an effort not to suffer that humiliation again whereas this has happened far too many times now.
The fact that it always happens at their shows, when the largest amount of eyes are on them, and is always accompanied by a sale that is only going to benefit from very upbeat announcements makes it feel unlikely to be coincidental.
What I don't get is why they don't address it to stave off any bad feeling, it would give the impression they respect their backers, people would feel they're being more transparent, PR wise it's win-win and all it would take is "We had hoped to get X to you by Y date but we've decided to hold off because feature A and feature B are coming along faster than anticipated, we feel it's worth waiting until we get those incorporated because of C, D and E, thank you for your understanding and patience."
Last edited: