#support3rdparty - Why we temporarily shut down our sites.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I can't believe some of you people who are criticizing the 3rd party supports for simply wanting some respectful communication from Frontier on API changes. Do any of you understand how much work, time, and effort these people have devoted, FOR FREE, to ensure that all of us have access to these invaluable tools? Lost our respect??? You have got to be fracking kidding me. Thankfully Frontier seems to understand much better than all of you naysayers do, as their quick and positive response on the matter was entirely appropriate. They fully realize just how much value the 3rd parties add to the game and the community, maybe the negative Nancy crowd should take Frontier's lead on this one and simply thank the 3rd party's without the belittling and down-talking.
A-and may I add-men! And A-women too for good measure! :)

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Mengy again. - reload quicker ya darn website! :D
 
Last edited:
As much as radical it could have seemed, I totally approve the way of the 3d party tools, that I use a lot my self, and the swift feedback from FD.
 
There are some seriously arrogant replies on here. To think that things like EDDN, EDDiscovery, EDSM, EDMC, EDDB, Inara etc are trivial pieces of software to build and would be replaced 'easily' really grinds my gears.

These people give their time and energy for nothing. Nearly all of them do not run any ads at all, none of them to my knowledge ask for any payment.

These things consume vast amounts of time to keep upto date and a serious money commitment for the hardware.

Damn right I support these people today. After watching the last two years of lack of commitment from FD and at times the downright attempts to close down the source of data by FD I'm amazed these people still do what they do.

Some people on here made me real sad today.

Kudos EDCD members and kudos FD for resolving this and hopefully this will lead to a more fruitful relationship and an even more enriched gaming experience for Elite Dangerous.

Hear hear. +1
 
I can't believe some of you people who are criticizing the 3rd party supports for simply wanting some respectful communication from Frontier on API changes. Do any of you understand how much work, time, and effort these people have devoted, FOR FREE, to ensure that all of us have access to these invaluable tools? Lost our respect??? You have got to be fracking kidding me.

Thankfully Frontier seems to understand much better than all of you naysayers do, as their quick and positive response on the matter was entirely appropriate. They fully realize just how much value the 3rd parties add to the game and the community, maybe the negative Nancy crowd should take Frontier's lead on this one and simply thank the 3rd party's without the belittling and down-talking.

Amen to that!

And those are the people claiming that the "in game tools are enough". on that! While it can achieved with the poor game mechanics we have it is frustrating to do so.

And this came from a guy with 14 weeks of gameplay and counting, as many of other cmdrs.

Those tools are a really QoL necessity in this game.
 
Last edited:
They AREN'T necessary though, I've been playing since Alpha and I never use these "tools/cheats/crutches*" *delete where applicable.
I'm not denying they aren't helpful to some, but necessary? no, not at all.

Being a Trader without the 3rd party tools is like being an explorer without the System Map.
 
Last edited:
As I mentioned in my previous post, if you don't want this to happen again you need to shift the balance of power away from third party middlemen and regain control over your own playerbase. You need to work on integrating the functions of many of these tools into the game proper so that they can't be held hostage to get your attention again, and so that the rest of us don't have to bounce around google for half an hour to just to find where to get a particular module or rock.
Yes they put a lot of effort into these things, but remember that nobody asked them to, and they only exist as a reaction to the dearth of information available in-game. Ultimately they should not need to exist, but they do because of the shortcomings of the game design. Resolve that and threads like this won't be a recurring issue.

This!

Get back to make this game great instead of adding features that "sells the game", where players then discover they need to spend more time outside the game to do things in the game.

I am here to stay, as I have proclaimed in another thread, but seeing how much these third party tools are needed in order to play the game, I would argue that the game lacks a whole lot of features. I would rather see that you, FD, start to think about how to implement these things into the game, rather than adding fancy features and forcing us, the playerbase, to use forums, web-based applications and other tools in order to have fun in the game.

From a financial point of view, you are doing the right thing to support these third party developers; you don't have to develop these things yourself and make them work in the game. But, as a VR player, most of the third party tools just doesn't work.

Take controll of Your game, and have this thread as a reminder of what people need, in the game, not outside the game. Work towards a goal which should be; The less third party developers we need, the better our game will become!

This is in no way a diss towards the third party developers who have contributed TONS. I do thank you ALL very much... but the end goal here should really be that "third party developers are not needed".

Until that happens though, I will support all third party developers I use, because without them, Elite: Dangerous is a fairly dead game.
 
I can't believe some of you people who are criticizing the 3rd party supports for simply wanting some respectful communication from Frontier on API changes. Do any of you understand how much work, time, and effort these people have devoted, FOR FREE, to ensure that all of us have access to these invaluable tools? Lost our respect??? You have got to be fracking kidding me. Thankfully Frontier seems to understand much better than all of you naysayers do, as their quick and positive response on the matter was entirely appropriate. They fully realize just how much value the 3rd parties add to the game and the community, maybe the negative Nancy crowd should take Frontier's lead on this one and simply thank the 3rd party's without the belittling and down-talking.

Because the 'Ends do not justify the means'. The group just assumed they would get no support so they opted, for the nuclear option. Because they could, and they wanted FD to know it. They used the dependency of the players, against FD. "Give us what we want, or suffer for it".

They showed complete disdain for the people that use their sites, to poke FD in the nose. What they did was no different than the tactics used to create drama, by that group bringing the Heat Mechanics to what they thought was FD attention. In that case the demonstration was derided. Killing noobs to get FD's attention was widely panned. But, because Data makes people happy, the strong arm tactics are accepted. So we applaud one group for strong arming FD, because we need their output, but doing the same by another group puts them in the ranks of griefers. We are a bunch of hypocrites, aren't we?
 
I can't believe some of you people who are criticizing the 3rd party supports for simply wanting some respectful communication from Frontier on API changes...

Touched a nerve did we? Don't like the result? The above was not the subject at all. It's all about the actions taken to accomplish it and the negative effect it had on many. Ridicule or ignore it as desired but that won't make it go away. You made your point. Live with the results.
 
Because the 'Ends do not justify the means'. The group just assumed they would get no support so they opted, for the nuclear option. Because they could, and they wanted FD to know it. They used the dependency of the players, against FD. "Give us what we want, or suffer for it".

They showed complete disdain for the people that use their sites, to poke FD in the nose. What they did was no different than the tactics used to create drama, by that group bringing the Heat Mechanics to what they thought was FD attention. In that case the demonstration was derided. Killing noobs to get FD's attention was widely panned. But, because Data makes people happy, the strong arm tactics are accepted. So we applaud one group for strong arming FD, because we need their output, but doing the same by another group puts them in the ranks of griefers. We are a bunch of hypocrites, aren't we?

NO, they opted for the nuclear option because they are frustrated, like a great many of us are, but while most of us just play the game they code and develop and program tools to use with it, for free public use. That's a huge amount of work on their part, work which could be made much less and simpler with just some basic communication from Frontier when they change things.

The 3rd parties didn't do this to punish the players, they did it because they are tired of being disrespected for the value they add to this game. Think about that the next time you go to post about how horrible they are for wanting some communication.

Frontier did a solid here today in talking with them so quickly, good job on them.
 
Last edited:
A big thank you to all the developers of third party tools for your continued hard work that contributed to making Elite Dangerous as popular as it is today. It's hard to imagine playing the game without your tools nowadays.

I must also thank Frontier for quickly coming to the negotiating table to bring about a speedy resolution to this episode.

With everyone busy completing their own tasks and meeting their deadlines, people often forget to communicate with each other and non-urgent but important issues often get overlooked. However, it's clear from the outset that the EDCD team were looking for a long term solution that would benefit Frontier, the 3rd party developers and of course the players, and Frontier responded positively in kind.

Kudos all round for working together to solve problems. [up]
 
The only people complaining about the way this was handled are the same ones who would have fluffed off the importance of these tools in the first place. That small percentage of the community is clueless, and will always remain so. I can't squeeze my fingers together tight enough to express how little I care about what they think about any of this.

Well to clarify things for you, I'm complaining most of all because it shuts down wing message boards for the whole weekend - no wing communication. In other words it shuts down and shuts out the community that supports it.
 
Being a Trader without the 3rd party tools is like being an explorer without the System Map.

Right?

Who even need system map anyway, all the info you need is there in the SC HUD and in game. Wanna know what kind of planet is that one 5000ls away? Fly to it and see for yourself. Wanna know what materials are on the surface? Land, break some rocks and write down the contents. It's so easy that the system map feels like cheating.
 
Well to clarify things for you, I'm complaining most of all because it shuts down wing message boards for the whole weekend - no wing communication. In other words it shuts down and shuts out the community that supports it.

yeah...that's totally the responsibility of an unpaid third party. Not like Fdev should be handling this at all. /s

- - - Updated - - -

Right?

Who even need system map anyway, all the info you need is there in the SC HUD and in game. Wanna know what kind of planet is that one 5000ls away? Fly to it and see for yourself. Wanna know what materials are on the surface? Land, break some rocks and write down the contents. It's so easy that the system map feels like cheating.

TOTALLY! You should sit there with a pencil and graph paper and map out the systems yourself!
 
Wanna know what materials are on the surface? Land, break some rocks and write down the contents. It's so easy that the system map feels like cheating.

Let me get this straight...

You are advocating for a game where you need to go outside the game in order to store data? Am I reading that correct?

If so, wouldn't it be a good thing to have a Notepad inside the game to write things down? Why should I have to leave the game in order to record notes, I wonder?
 
Let me get this straight...

You are advocating for a game where you need to go outside the game in order to store data? Am I reading that correct?

If so, wouldn't it be a good thing to have a Notepad inside the game to write things down? Why should I have to leave the game in order to record notes, I wonder?

I'm presuming he's being sarcastic but honestly it's hard to tell around here sometimes.
 
So they let the terrorists win. [mad]

Terrorists? Please tell me that you are not calling the 3rd party support devs terrorists? Surely you aren't, are you?

Would you prefer that Captain's Log, Coriolis, ED-Board, Elite Dangerous Codex, EDDB, ED Shipyard, EDSM, and INARA all simply went away instead? They don't have to bother doing any of this, they could just close shop tomorrow and not bother anymore, and play the game like all of us instead of programming for it for free. Would that make you happier?

Maybe if you feel that they are on par with terrorists then you should stop using all of the tools they provide as a protest. I mean you surely don't want to use anything developed by terrorists, right? There you go, just stop using these free 3rd party tools. Moral problem solved Thrustmaster, enjoy!

Or maybe instead of insulting the people who make your game experience a better one, you could just say "thank you"?
 
Last edited:
I'm presuming he's being sarcastic but honestly it's hard to tell around here sometimes.

Yeah... and I might come across as stale and all that, but... it is better to be diplomatic and listen since sarcasm is hard to read if there aren't any smileys around. :)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom