If I wanted a 'radio-tuning' game I would have rather bought an old radio.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

[Diplomacy] Carnegie

[Diplomacy] Carnegie
cheesenbiscuits said:
So rather than having an endless back and forth,have their been any discussion as to how to improve the FSS?
If so,somebody needs to round them up in a neat little package so the players and FD know exactly where to go in development.
Click to expand...

There have been multiple suggestions raised in this thread, in the previous threadnaught, the beta forums and after the initial reveal. Various of these have been raised in separate threads in Dangerous Discussion and the Suggestions forum.

The response from FDev has been a couple of minor tweaks in beta, but nothing on the more substantial changes requested by both pro- and anti-FSS sides.

It doesn't appear that FDev are paying any attention at this point.
 

Scytale

Banned
S
Well, it's not like we, FSS dislikers, had opened a sub-Reddit..
So... Why would they care ?
Everything stays in the family...
 
Last edited:

Burke

B
That galaxy... well it was more than "just a game" Now it isnt. Thats what the FSS did, it broke something really quite special. And now ED... whats it really got to offer anybody?

If you took exploration only and seperated it out into its own game, pretty good chance thats a browser game now. Think about it, only thing a broswer game couldnt match would be the GFX.
 
Last edited:

Ambroza

Ambroza
Burke said:
That galaxy... well it was more than "just a game" Now it isnt. Thats what the FSS did, it broke something really quite special. And now ED... whats it really got to offer anybody?

If you took exploration only and seperated it out into its own game, pretty good chance thats a browser game now. Think about it, only thing a broswer game couldnt match would be the GFX.
Click to expand...

Again with the melodrama
 

Riverside

Riverside
Not much of an acknowledgement but this might help to placate some:

Will Flanagan said:
Hi everyone,

Just wanted to jump in here to say thank you for your feedback, and to ask that you keep your responses as considerate and constructive as possible. It makes it more useful for us to be effective with how we help in future.

We have communicated the incoming patches as and when we are able to share that information with you, and we are aware of the other issues that some players are experiencing. As mentioned previously, when resolving bugs we must first attend to the problems that the majority of players are experiencing as a priority, with the intention of solving as many problems as possible. Please try to keep this in mind if a specific issue that is affecting your gameplay experience isn’t fixed sooner than others.

We keep an eye on as many forum threads as possible, and always pass on community sentiment and feedback to the developers, who are well aware of the issues some of you are experiencing.

With regards to the Background Simulation issues throughout this thread, we'd like to point you towards a post we made the other day in the active thread about some of those issues. We are busy trying to find solutions to some of these BGS reports and need specific feedback in order to create the smoothest play experience for all Elite Dangerous players. Have a look at the forum thread here to see how you can help – apologies if this isn’t posted somewhere you would have seen sooner.

As mentioned just before the holiday break, we aren’t ready to share any more information about the future of Elite Dangerous with you yet, but as usual you’ll hear about it through all of our usual communication channels, including our social media accounts, the newsletter and here on the forums.

Thanks again!
Click to expand...
 

-VR- Max Factor

-VR- Max Factor
Burke said:
That galaxy... well it was more than "just a game" Now it isnt. Thats what the FSS did, it broke something really quite special. And now ED... whats it really got to offer anybody?
Click to expand...
Okaaaaaaay. From what I can gather the galaxy hasn't changed one bit. The galaxy isn't broken in any shape or form and is still there and is still very special.

Burke said:
If you took exploration only and seperated it out into its own game, pretty good chance thats a browser game now. Think about it, only thing a broswer game couldnt match would be the GFX.
Click to expand...
You can easily say that about any single gameplay mechanic.
 

Burke

B
Have to assume they know then. I actually got a reply :) They said go write in the suggestions forum. Didnt seem much point making yet another thread tho.
 
Last edited:

Riverside

Riverside
Burke said:
Have to assume they know then. I actually got a reply :) They said go write in the suggestions forum. Didnt seem much point making yet another thread tho.
Click to expand...

Add your feedback to the existing ones then. Specifically what you like & don't like about the various ideas, or just a general 'I like this idea' would do.
 

Burke

B
I posted in your thread. But honestly, all im going to tell them is its terrible and its broken the game for me. I dont think anybody is interested in hearing that.

I think i made my own thread when i first saw the thing.
 
Last edited:

Burke

B
I dont want to rain on anybody enthusiasm but all the good ideas are so complex they are never going to happen. Our best hope was a "ok we reaslise maybe we shouldnt have took it away" hotfix.
 

Riverside

Riverside
Burke said:
I posted in your thread. But honestly, all im going to tell them is its terrible and its broken the game for me. I dont think anybody is interested in hearing that.

I think i made my own thread when i first saw the thing.
Click to expand...

I'm sure I will be mocked for saying this but it's better to say something twice than not at all. Obviously only having to say it once and receiving an acknowledgement would be optimal, but I prefer to make sure than to assume.


A More Advanced Discovery Scanner
Change pre-3.3 First Discovered Tags to First Visited
Orbital Plane Established, 43 new signatures found
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom