Last edited:
I always check Lagrange points in interesting systems. Particularly L3, L4 and L5, because it's easy to just fly a lap of the orbit line.
L1 is on the path from star to planet, so that one is free. L2 can be more tricky to be sure of
I don't think you can take the date of Brewer's incorporation / start of starport manufacture as a limiting date.
The TDW station is just said to be a Toroid.
In the no-artificial gravity ED universe, the Toroid is pretty much the most effective station design if it's intended for long term habitation:
- The spin is stable
- No contrarotating parts are needed to maintain the stability of the spin
- Much less wear and tear as a consequence.
- Full effective gravity at the habitation sections
- Zero grav docking, and zero/very low grav loading/unloading
- Day/night can be created via the spin and orientation
It'd be very surprising if Toroid stations weren't in use from very early times.
(Just going to add for clarity that it's not the optimal design for all types of station. The optimal design will change depending on what a station's purposes are.)
Apparently it's not an isolated phenomena on Saturn.
Birkeland currents more visible in gassy atmospheres?
That image, familiar? Where have I seen that before?
Yeah... that's not actually what the FD statement said I'm afraid.I just find myself often wondering about that FDev statement that the location is "a little bit obvious".
It could be I suppose, but if it is a Toroid then that's what the shape is. And the Guardians were pretty similar to us, and so the basic principles of station shapes would apply to them just as they would to us (assuming the no-artificial gravity rule is maintained). A lot of it is just down to basic physics.It might even be a Guardian station, of some unknown shape not constrained to one of the human station types.
Yeah... that's not actually what the FD statement said I'm afraid.
18 1 24 24 12 1
If seen in the wild, take pictures![]()
Location, as the original statement doesn't say anything about location being a tiny (or little) bit obvious. There's lots of stuff going round at the moment that's been heard/read second, third (or more) hand and not actually being what was originally said. Wouldn't want to see you going off on a wild goose chase because someone else had misstated what was said!Raxxla is in the Milky Way. This was confirmed during DJTruthsayer's lore interview with Michael Brookes.
Question: "Where is Raxxla?" Brookes: "Well it's in the Milky Way, but I can't tell you where it is. It's a journey that everyone has to travel for themselves." Question: "You have said that there will be no clues though?" Brookes: "That's true, but I think you have to make some of it a tiny bit obvious just so people know what they're doing. There's nothing to be revealed at this stage."
Are you quibbling because I changed 'tiny' to 'little', or because I used the word 'location'? lol
0118 999 881 999 119 7253101 600 631
Yeah... that's not actually what the FD statement said I'm afraid.
Yeah, but it's not a response to the original question though. What we've actually got is:In a sense it was tho. In the interview MB was asked
Q: “it’s been said there would be no clues”
MB: with a ponderous look “that’s... trueee” (in a way that would imply it is true-ish) but I think you have to make some of it just a tiny bit obvious so people know what they’re doing”
I don't know if this has been mentioned before but the background of the dark wheel symbol depicts pi to the 10th decimal i think(someone smarter needs to confirm). Is the symbol from in game or from somewhere else?
I don't know if this has been mentioned before but the background of the dark wheel symbol depicts pi to the 10th decimal i think(someone smarter needs to confirm). Is the symbol from in game or from somewhere else?