Please reconsider fleet carriers for solo players.
- Thread starter CMDR Karrde Sun
- Start date
- Status
No, that's not what I said at all.
No endgame, yet you've reinstalled.
They're doing something right.
You aren't forced.
And yet I understood it.
Endgame in a sandbox is a contradiction.
Will you stop with the garbage. Let's look at your ESO novella..
The mount in the expansion is available to everyone if they are skilled enough to get it. Nowhere does it say you have to be a member of a guild? Or maybe you can point me to that bit?
Please, explain to me the progression in Elite? Last time I checked I had a Cutter in under 24hrs played on my most recent account. So that blows your 'progression' right down the toilet.
Carriers are not a 'reward'. Saying it is is just silly. From what I'm reading here, you guys want to feel special with your carriers. You want it to be some status symbol. You talk about ESO and skills yet, most will just login in because they are a squadron member will automagically have access to a carrier. That take some skill all right.
I think if they do indeed add carriers to Elite then every player should have access, whether they are in some groupy thing or not.
As for 'top tier' rewards... What utter tripe. I re-iterate, I have an account with under 24hrs played, a Cutter and an Anaconda and a T10 and billions in the bank. Top tier my Arx !
So I can get one if I'm a solo player? Sorry I mis-read your post.
If I decide not to earn any money in game I can't own an Anaconda. People who do earn money can own an Anaconda. That's discrimination.
We don't know yet. But even if you can't, you aren't forced, because it's completely optional. That's the opposite of force.
You COULD be in a Squad and STILL be Solo and STILL have access to one these ships, but I guess it does not fit your needy narrative.
He payed for the game, therefore he must have access to all features on his terms.
It's discriminating that he needs to search for Raxxla while the game could just tell him where it is. Instead he is forced to become a plonker.
I would rather have a large scale moduler ship so i can out fit it for trips out to the black it could have 2 med landing pads and one locked off for my personal use the other 2 could have repair and a place to turn in data services long range explorers know how to refuel for free so no refuel o7 one can dream
The thing is, it's perfectly valid to want a personal fleet carrier.
That's as good as the argument gets.
However, it's also perfectly valid if you don't want everyone to have a personal fleet carrier.
The argument doesn't get any better when you throw terms like discrimination or force at it, it just becomes more silly.
That's as good as the argument gets.
However, it's also perfectly valid if you don't want everyone to have a personal fleet carrier.
The argument doesn't get any better when you throw terms like discrimination or force at it, it just becomes more silly.
Unless you can afford to hire a few thousand NPCs...
Oh no - first the demands for vanity carriers, then the demands will start for vanity NPCs to make them look populated
If it does, maybe the problem solves itself. If carriers won't have any benefits for a solo player and too cumbersome and expensive to run, then few will bother getting one.
And we'll probably have the same discussion next year about base building.
"Access" isn't the same thing as "automatically awarded no matter what".
Solo players don't have access to PvP or wings either, because both are mode-restricted multi-player content. If carriers are the same then I'll have no problem with it- because all modes aren't equal. They never were.
- Status