Newcomer / Intro What are you up to?

Speakin' of astronomy:

We have all heard about the Big Bang, how the universe expanded very rapidly from a single point to something much much larger. However, there were sort of a second expansion we rarely think about.

Up until early in the previous century, the faint fuzzies in the night sky were consider more or less that. Distant fuzzies. The general consensus was that the Milky Way was the whole Universe, containing mysterious phenomena like nebulae and star clusters. The Astronomer Edwin Hubble was quite well connected, so he managed to get time at the newly build observatory at Mount Wilson. There he studied the Andromeda "nebula". Hubble and others had a hypothesis that the Andromeda Nebula was actually a galaxy just like the Milky Way, and by carefully measuring the light from a particular star he could see on a photograph of Andromeda, he was able to tell the distance to it. That turned out to be much further away than the size of our galaxy. The moment he realized that, the Universe went through a second Big Bang inside Edwin's head. He had just proved that many of the fuzzies believed to be part of the Milky Way was in fact actual distant galaxies, and that the Universe was much larger than people had thought. Kaboom!

Another funny anecdote about the discovery was that the mirror for the telescope had to be produced in New York, where the mirror polishing and coating expertise was. Then it had to be transported across the US to Mount Wilson. Back then people knew that looking far into the Universe equals looking back in time, due to the speed of light. This caused concern, that looking far enough, or back in time enough, would show "God working in his laboratory" while creating Earth. Therefore there were concerns that the mirror would be sabotaged by religious fanatics on it's way towards the telescope. As a result a special bullet proof box was constructed around the mirror, so that when the train carrying it passed, nobody could shoot a rifle bullet at it :)

Getting the mirror up to the top of Mount Wilson was also quite a task:

147288
 
Speakin' of astronomy:

We have all heard about the Big Bang, how the universe expanded very rapidly from a single point to something much much larger. However, there were sort of a second expansion we rarely think about.

Up until early in the previous century, the faint fuzzies in the night sky were consider more or less that. Distant fuzzies. The general consensus was that the Milky Way was the whole Universe, containing mysterious phenomena like nebulae and star clusters. The Astronomer Edwin Hubble was quite well connected, so he managed to get time at the newly build observatory at Mount Wilson. There he studied the Andromeda "nebula". Hubble and others had a hypothesis that the Andromeda Nebula was actually a galaxy just like the Milky Way, and by carefully measuring the light from a particular star he could see on a photograph of Andromeda, he was able to tell the distance to it. That turned out to be much further away than the size of our galaxy. The moment he realized that, the Universe went through a second Big Bang inside Edwin's head. He had just proved that many of the fuzzies believed to be part of the Milky way was actual distant galaxies, and that the Universe was much larger than people had thought. Kaboom!

Another funny anecdote about the discovery was that the mirror for the telescope had to be produced in New York, where the mirror polishing and coating expertise was. Then it had to be transported across the US to Mount Wilson. Back then people knew that looking far into the Universe equals looking back in time, due to the speed of light. This caused concern, that looking far enough, or back in time enough, would show "God working in his laboratory" while creating Earth. Therefore there were concerns that the mirror would be sabotaged by religious fanatics on it's way towards the telescope. As a result a special bullet proof box was constructed around the mirror, so that when the train carrying it passed, nobody could shoot a rifle bullet at it :)

Getting the mirror up to the top of Mount Wilson was also quite a task:

View attachment 147288
Nice Mack! :D(y)
 
Finally finished redoing my binds. It'll be interesting to how I fair in the interdiction game with my new stick; so far, I have quite a few unused buttons. The one thing that is alien to me (arf) is I now twist to roll - my previous joystick didn't have that functionality.

It's interesting how many controls I had that I took for granted and then struggled to find the setting I needed to change. I'm sure ED must hold the record for the sheer amount of mapable bindings! :D
Nah, at least coming over to ED from EVE:Valkyrie was dead simple. E:V bindings is a freakin' nightmare!

When setting up your personal bindings, one of the important things to consider is the thrusters, pips and the fire buttons. Those are the ones you want easily reachable. Regarding yaw, I have a pair of pedals that I never use. Having yaw in the stick feels much more natural once you get your muscle memory trained.

Which stick did you buy?
 
Dumb question time.

When you start the game, how many kill points does it take to graduate from Harmless to Mostly Harmless? I understand the mechanic where the points towards rank is based on your own rank and a sliding scale of your target's rank, but at what "score" does the rank upgrade to Mostly Harmless take place? I can't remember if it's after your first kill or if it's based on the points scale.
I never counted, but it's more than one kill. I've restarted a number of times. One time I only shot a few skimmers, no ships at all, and got the rank that way. But it took a few. It probably depends more on the rank of the ship(s) you kill.

-----------
And yes, twist for yaw. It's the best way if you ask me.
 
Need a change of ride.
At the moment I seem to be using the Jumpaconda, Jump DBX, or the Scavenger Python.

Considered an AspX, not had one on PC yet, but I used it to death on PS4.

A quick check on Coriolis...
Krait Phantom, that will do nicely!
Looking at about 63 Ly laden. (y)
For my last "expedition" I built a slimmed down Phantom, and it's a fine explorer, but I probably slimmed it too much to get it to ~70 ly jump range. The thrusters were weak and it had no shield. That makes landing on high G planets exciting.

On the trip I'm on now, I considered the T-10 due to the cockpit view, but gave it up due to jump range and lack of maneuverability. Then it struck me, that the AspX had a similar view from the bridge, and that it was a lot more nimble. An Asp?!? It's a magnificent explorer, but because most of us gets it early in the game, we forget later on, once we get the Conda etc. I hated the AspX when I finally got a "better" ship, but those ships were better for mining, shooting stuff, carrying cargo etc. Now I'm really beginning to love the AspX. For exploring it's close to perfect. I guess all those explorers saying so, were right after all...

147304
 
For my last "expedition" I built a slimmed down Phantom, and it's a fine explorer, but I probably slimmed it too much to get it to ~70 ly jump range. The thrusters were weak and it had no shield. That makes landing on high G planets exciting.

On the trip I'm on now, I considered the T-10 due to the cockpit view, but gave it up due to jump range and lack of maneuverability. Then it struck me, that the AspX had a similar view from the bridge, and that it was a lot more nimble. An Asp?!? It's a magnificent explorer, but because most of us gets it early in the game, we forget later on, once we get the Conda etc. I hated the AspX when I finally got a "better" ship, but those ships were better for mining, shooting stuff, carrying cargo etc. Now I'm really beginning to love the AspX. For exploring it's close to perfect. I guess all those explorers saying so, were right after all...

View attachment 147304
I like the big fuel scoop on an AspX.
I think it's the only thing I dislike on the DBX.
 
I decided to try Low Temperature Diamond mining today. I've been doing mostly Painite lately. Laser mining, not Core mining, I mean.

But one of the things I always enjoyed about Core mining for Void Opals was being in the Icy rings. I just enjoy the scenery. And Painite is in metallic rings, which are also nice, but not quite as pretty I guess.

So it was enjoyable today to be back in an Icy ring, after looking at brown rocks the last few times.

147307


Money wise it was similar to Painite mining. I was in an overlapping hotspot with 3 overlaps, so there were a lot of useful asteroids in it.

147308


I'm getting pretty comfortable at flying the Cutter with just thrusters (not using throttle at all). It works great for maneuvering around the asteroids, and I enjoy the freedom of moving in any direction. It's very "space-like" to me.

Anyway, that's what I've been up to. :)
 
This one. Nothing fancy but it feels a heap better than the basic stick I had before :D

I decided to experimentally swap-in my Logitech 3D after posting in your other thread so at least its binds are now up to date. Still can't come to terms with it though, the hand position seems tilted too far forward for my liking and having twist on the stick really makes me uncomfortable but it didn't feel as "loose" as I remembered. So it still didn't make me "git gud"er and I placed it back in storage. Nice to know that we can still hot-swap between controllers in-game (as long as they are connected to the PC on game startup of course). I am sure you will enjoy it though.
 
I'm away from the game for a few days, but thinking about ships and mining. I know I want my next combat ship to be a Vulture (from Cobra) but not sure yet about non combat ship. Assuming I can manage to get to grips with core mining I intend to do some more and get a better ship for it. I've been having my eyes on both kraits and also.. The chieftain... Now hear me out, I know I can only get 64 slots in a mining setup, but there are several appealing things about it: Good and many hardpoint placements, seems quite tanky, heard it's agile, and it looks cool. I usually don't get much more than 2 hours for a session, so I'm not sure that the cargo size is actually a problem. How does the kraits compare with agility, ability to fight of pirates, cargo, and view from cockpit? I think especially the phantom look great visually of the two.
 
I'm away from the game for a few days, but thinking about ships and mining. I know I want my next combat ship to be a Vulture (from Cobra) but not sure yet about non combat ship. Assuming I can manage to get to grips with core mining I intend to do some more and get a better ship for it. I've been having my eyes on both kraits and also.. The chieftain... Now hear me out, I know I can only get 64 slots in a mining setup, but there are several appealing things about it: Good and many hardpoint placements, seems quite tanky, heard it's agile, and it looks cool. I usually don't get much more than 2 hours for a session, so I'm not sure that the cargo size is actually a problem. How does the kraits compare with agility, ability to fight of pirates, cargo, and view from cockpit? I think especially the phantom look great visually of the two.

2 hour sessions, core mining - if you add "avoid fighting anyone", you got my core mining ship, a Diamondback Explorer. 36+6 tons space will give you ~60 MCr. per run if you go to a high sell VO station. I like the cockpit view, the small size, the agility and the operational range without a scoop. I'm mining in the Colonia area, though, so a high sell station is basically always within range (and pristine rings with nice hotspots are in every second system).

If you want to fight off pirates, I'd use a Krait. In fact, I do use a Krait Mk. II as an armed transport (close to this - WIP, that example won't fly due to power issues). Triple Pacifiers (Frags if you don't have Pacs) make very short work of almost any NPC wanting to get something of my cargo. "Almost" because a heavily shielded T-10 would have given me a bit to think about - "would have", since by coincidence had fitted reverb cascade torpedoes to the M hardpoints just before taking that specific mission. Not really recommended, though, as the ammo cost for torps is really crippling. The same Krait as miner, with a charge launcher an abrasion blaster on the M HPs, and 64-128 tons of Cargo? Why not? You'd have to replace the reinforcements with collectors and other gear, so you'd need to be a bit careful when tackling an Anaconda or a Corvette.

I've been playing around with designing a Chief or Challenger as a miner, but couldn't see the point, compared to the DBX or the Krait.
 
Back
Top Bottom