At least I have a great enough grasp of the language to not say something like "In your case that may not be the case" and would use a word like "situation" or "circumstances" and not repeat "case" twice.Actually that was better since you said I went to school at least. In your case that maybe not the case.
Stay in school.
Conversely, you just saying you can't doesn't mean anything. Except I provide rationale to support my statement and you do your best with what you have, I suppose.Yes, it is. I can technically play but not enjoy all the features. Just because you say I do not have rationale doesn't mean I don't. (you're not the center of the universe).
Apparently you are unfamiliar with the concept of cosmetics.Cosmetics are part of any game. Stripping your character of anything, but one default ugly skin and then charging you for skins is the thing that doesn't make sense.
"Subjective opinion" is redundant. Also my statement was not opinion-based, but objective: "At no point during gameplay does somebody need to pay additional money to continue to play."Again with your subjective opinions. Doesn't make sense to you, who cares?
That's not an opinion. That's a factual statement. Do you not know the difference between the two?
Keep this sentence in mind as you immediately proceed to do that.Treating a skin like an expansion like horizon or beyond is the failure here.
I, however, made a distinction between the two.
Are you making a point?You can simply compare prices even .. see how much you paid for horizons and how many skins you get for that money.
Because in whatever direction you're going, I got Horizons for PC on sale, and I've already gotten free skins through ARX so theoretically I could get every skin in the game for the cost of Horizons because I paid $0 for it.
Oh boy.You do not have to respond to me if you don't agree. Simple as that .. I see that you have this urge to "emerge victorious" by insulting others and prove that you're right in every way saying "you're wrong" "your analogy failes" ..etc I did the same to show you that I can do that as well. Either Learn how to deal with different opinions or you can simply not reply to them.
Maybe if your argument wasn't so terrible I wouldn't have to point out the many, many issues with it. I know it would be easier for you if I didn't come along and point out how what you're saying is wrong.
I argue with people who have opinions and points that are pretty well thought-out, and I can respect their position even if I don't particularly agree with it, because they make a reasonable argument and state their case in a way that is rational.
You, however, have none of those things, and hold your precious opinion before any reasoned discussion. It's all about what you want.
It's not like if it wasn't for me, everyone would look at your post and hoist you upon their shoulders, and parade you through the streets as the one, unifying voice of the community. Plenty of others can see the glaring problems with your comparisons and complaints. Other people have made some arguments against microtransactions and ARX, but they were more capable of forming a coherent statement and formulating rationale in support of their opinion.
Incorrect.I did the same to show you that I can do that as well.