Your own words:you talk about things like the word "waste" .... Why bother wuth pepople like that? you can understand my words as you want champion, it's not my problem![]()
Your own words:you talk about things like the word "waste" .... Why bother wuth pepople like that? you can understand my words as you want champion, it's not my problem![]()
?????????????????????Your own words:
I disagree. Delays, changing plans, etc. is pretty normal in development. If people ask for a more open roadmap they need to stop whining whenever something changes.
Meanwhile, FDEV released something like 15-20 major updates and only three of them have been delayed. If anything, they aren't delaying things often enough, which results in the buggy updates we don't like.
I don't really like that word, but the "normal" thing of a lifetime has been to buy a single game ... anyway![]()
I am ashamed to say, that yes, I am that person and I can only apologise.So I've noticed, that is assuming you're the same 'Alien' who used to have a reversible avatar, and who led a number of vitriolic personal attacks on me in multiple threads on this forum, most memorably perhaps when I complained about the introduction of gimballed weapons being against the spirit of the game? And so. We meet again.
See, we can't even make peace with the current, bare bones roadmap. Imagine what would happen if they gave us more details and that stuff actually changed. Pitchforks!The fiasco of Focussed Feedback and the discussed topics has put a black mark on all of this, along with not improving features like Powerplay, CQC, multicrew while cutting back on lore at the same time. FD has changed direction about three times appears to be wrapped around the development of other titles. Its chaotic.
* If people ask for a more open roadmap*
The roadmap we have is bare bones at best, with very little disclosed until a month way from release. All a lot of people ask for is stuff thats announced two years ago is delivered in a reasonable timeframe and to a decent quality.
Looking forward to your support next time someone asks for more info. Be prepared to get insulted.I've noticed lately that FD have been announcing release dates for patches weeks in advance. So yeah, they should "delay" them if they are buggy, but IMO they shouldn't paint themselves into a corner like that in the first place. It's just asking for trouble. Just give a broad release (Q4 2019 for example) time frame, and release it When. It. Is. Done. Maybe announce it a day or two beforehand, so people can make appropriate plans with their Cmdr if they need to, but otherwise...
Looking forward to your support next time someone asks for more info. Be prepared to get insulted.
Elite isn't a normal game.
For a start, it's the only online game I play. Most games allow you to have several save files. Elite: Dangerous doesn't. They reneged on their KS promise of DRM-free offline mode a week before the release in November 2014.
So, when there's a sale on (and there's usually a few a year) I sometimes pick up an extra copy. Pretty sure loads of other players do the same.
Actually it was meant to be rather funny than passive aggressive...The first rule of passive aggressive club is...
... you know what, never mind. It's FINE.
where? on the psn store, on the game description (oficial) and pretty much everyone says its a simulator you are the first person thats telling me its not tbh!Where exactly is stated that Elite: Dangerous is a SIMULATOR!!! Elite: Dangerous is a SciFi-Spaceship-Game. It never claimed to be a "simulator".
Why? A simulation is ALWAYS based upon already existing, real-world, data. Otherwise it's simply not a simulator but a speculation.
But hey...I'm curious: Could I get your velocity-sheet of FTL-Drives or the MJ-Output of a Prismatic Shield Device? The Mega-Newtons that a Plasma-Slug impacts upon a static object, like a spaceship?
THIS is a SIMULATOR!!!
Digital Combat Simulator | DCS World | Combat Simulator
Combat Flight Simulator. Realistic simulation of military aircraft, tanks, ground vehicles, navy ships, world war two vehicles, trains and ships. Free download includes the Caucasus region and Black Sea that encompasses much of Georgia. It Including a Russian Sukhoi Su-25T ground attack aircraft...www.digitalcombatsimulator.com
But if you want something concrete, okay, I am bothered by the delay of FC, after 1 year playing was a rather curious incentive and content,and 6 months seems too much
and it seems an excuse to take pressure off, although I understand them.
Why do we fight each other???
Summarizing this situation,
1) FDev launched ARX with a lot of CRITICAL BUGS.
2) Some CMDRs worried about that. And they officially requested to fix bugs and to update ED correcltly.
3) FDev used CMDRs's requesting(for stabilizing) as an excuse for delaying Fleet Carrerier.
It just show FDev hadn't think that ED had a lot of problem, even though CMDRs sent a lot of issues to FDev by issue tracker.
It just show FDev had no willing to put more resource, despite of CMDRs sent a lot of issues to FDev by issue tracker.
It just show FDev didn't do their jobs, and few days ago FDev announced that they will do procrastinated-jobs instead of promised-jobs.
I think that FDev did wrong jobs and FDev do wrong decision.
FDev converted thier old-mistake to CMDR's binary decision between 'Stabilizing' and 'New Content', and now CMDRs fight each other.
I seek forgiveness to CMDRs, who I criticized, who just wanted stabilizing game.
#NOARX #UNTILFLEETCARRIER
Actually it was meant to be rather funny than passive aggressive...
See,.we can't even make peace with the current, bare bones roadmap. Imagine what would happen if they gave us more details and that stuff actually changed. Pitchforks!
IIRC you were a vocal supporter of the petition. Did you think listening to your demands wouldn't result in delays of the other stuff?
Don't worry, English isn't my first language. It's not always easy for me to find the right words.In that case, my apologies, but that's how it came across. My bad I suppose.![]()
The bugs hurt the game more than the absence of fleet carriers. There's only so many cards you can stack before you realise that you've built a house of cards, and it's better to sort the foundations and leaks out before you go adding more rooms.
Yeah they made a plan, but plans change. The September patch proved that the game code just can't cope with anything else being added without breaking other things, so you need to take a step back & start refactoring and fixing that lot. It'll ultimately help fleet carriers (& presumably the 'new era') so I'm 100% cool with the change of direction. It's long overdue IMO.
It would make sense if last year they hadn't said the same, no matter how much the plans change,they were going to do it this year(fix little bugs) ,but they worked on something else that none of you asked for, I say again that this is not the way to interact with your players,because FC sounds like a hoax.