Star Citizen Discussion Thread v11

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
At their current pace, they haven't even broke into the double-digit percentage of completing their commitments so 7–8 years more sounds wildly optimistic. 🤣
 
Yes and the origin said that only SC made promises while others didn't my whole point was that they all have done it. Ohh crap I mean on varying degrees some less than others. Before people come and say I want to paint all of them in one color.

You definitely launched into this by implying parity between SC and ED regarding undelivered content. The OP you were replying to didn’t say anything at all about SC alone making promises. They were just criticising SC. Why make this stuff up?

Anyways, glad you periodically agree that SC is far worse on the monetised dreamland front ;)
 
You definitely launched into this by stating parity between SC and ED regarding undelivered content. The OP you were replying to didn’t say anything at all about SC alone making promises. Why make this stuff up?

Anyways, glad you periodically agree that SC is far worse on the monetised dreamland front ;)
I have never disagreed about SC not being bad, I just disagreed about painting others as saints.
Very true. Elite & NMS have been created by their devs as stepping stones towards the dreams, but haven't sold themselves on the promises.
This is what I was OP replying to does seem like he states that. So could you stop calling me a liar and say I made it up.
 
Must say, its nice to see the planetary terrain, the Tier 0 planetary tech is slowly catching up with modern games.

Digital Foundry says next-gen and Agony says catching up to modern games. Guess who I will believe... The ones with credentials and that dedicate their lives to game visual tech.
 
New vid from SQ42!

Trying to work out what that ship is in the opening seconds...hate to say it, but the visual peek has piqued my interest in Sqn 42...I've never had it as part of my pledge, even on my first account.

Nice looking fer sure and interesting....Let's see what actually happens though ;)
 
Last edited:
I have never disagreed about SC not being bad, I just disagreed about painting others as saints.

You totally drew parity, as part of your windmilling entry to the thread. Then you got into this next argument about 6hrs later...

This is what I was OP replying to does seem like he states that. So could you stop calling me a liar and say I made it up.

Hah, fair enough. I wasn’t calling you a liar though, just deeply inconsistent. And even if I had been, I woulda been following your lead...

Liar Liar PANTS on FIAR.

:p

But in the spirit of Xmas I’ll stop being an arxhole now, and go revel in the latest slice of SQ42 :)
 
Digital Foundry says next-gen and Agony says catching up to modern games. Guess who I will believe... The ones with credentials and that dedicate their lives to game visual tech.

Ok last bit of arxholing...

The DF piece was a personal, subjective take from one member of that particular Patreon channel. It’s literally written in the description. In a ‘we couldn’t stop him’ kind of way ;)

He also barely mentioned visual tech and just wanged on about how great it was that gravity wasn’t consistent between physics grids. Like that was some good and intentional thing. Or the wonders of tech that doesn’t exist like server meshing. It was deeply professional ;)
 
Last edited:
You totally drew parity, as part of your windmilling entry to the thread. Then you got into this next argument about 6hrs later...



Hah, fair enough. I wasn’t calling you a liar though, just deeply inconsistent. And even if I had been, I woulda been following your lead...



:p

But in the spirit of Xmas I’ll stop being an arxhole now, and go revel in the latest slice of SQ42 :)
You seem to know much more what I was implying with my own post. I never drew them as equally bad. But I guess you like to add your own spice to thing and assume some extra bits here and there.

Also your last post clearly calls me out by saying that the OP i was replying to didn't say that SC was the only one and well if you go up and check the text I quoted that I was replying to you can see he clearly did. So I fail to see how you didn't call me a liar.
 
You seem to know much more what I was implying with my own post. I never drew them as equally bad. But I guess you like to add your own spice to thing and assume some extra bits here and there.

Also your last post clearly calls me out by saying that the OP i was replying to didn't say that SC was the only one and well if you go up and check the text I quoted that I was replying to you can see he clearly did. So I fail to see how you didn't call me a liar.
I'd just give it up mate, some folks on here just love to be plain ornerry...make an entire posting career of it even. Best just go and enjoy some Xmas booze with friends/family...it's a no win battle on this here thread, some are so stuck into personal crusades they make King Richard the Lionheart look like a debutante heading out out shopping. ;)
 
I'd just give it up mate, some folks on here just love to be plain ornerry...make an entire posting career of it even. Best just go and enjoy some Xmas booze with friends/family...it's a no win battle on this here thread, some are so stuck into personal crusades they make King Richard the Lionheart look like a debutante heading out out shopping. ;)
Yeah I think you are right. Thanks for the good tip.
 
New vid from SQ42!


It's me, I am the completely absent gameplay mechanics.

As with anything CI`g put out, it's all very pretty and atmospheric looking, but they do that in every promo video they release of anything, remember the ship adverts? They looked great, but no where near being an accurate representation of what the gameplay is like. As per usual, I fully expect them to completely miss the target and put out something that doesn't look anything like what's shown in that vid.

Never forget 'Star marine' in promo vids compared to "Star marine" the playable module. :)
 
It's me, I am the completely absent gameplay mechanics.

As with anything CI`g put out, it's all very pretty and atmospheric looking, but they do that in every promo video they release of anything, remember the ship adverts? They looked great, but no where near being an accurate representation of what the gameplay is like. As per usual, I fully expect them to completely miss the target and put out something that doesn't look anything like what's shown in that vid.

Never forget 'Star marine' in promo vids compared to "Star marine" the playable module. :)
Literally says Visual Teaser. And then you ask that question XD
P.S Not Gameplay Teaser.
 
Literally says Visual Teaser. And then you ask that question XD
P.S Not Gameplay Teaser.

You'd think that a game development studio, after getting dragged over the goals by factions both in and out of their own community, would do something a bit more than "look at the shiney", just you know, for once. I mean after as long as it's gone on for, you don't think the backers deserve more than this? :)

It's simply not good enough or in any way acceptable, and if the backer community have any sense, they'll be very annoyed.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom