EDO Performance low priority

[Erei]

Honestly from what I've seen... Cyberpunk on PC (setting aside console) was in a much better state at launch than Odyssey.

Not even in the same category. Cyberpunk works. Lots of bugs but most of them are visual (double cigarettes) or fairly minor (derpy AI). A few quests bugs (I had like 2-3 bugs in 160h). It run flawlessly, and have solid content to do. Optimization is very well done, I run it at max with no problem.

I can't even run Odyssey.

 

[Mogen Teras]

Not even in the same category. Cyberpunk works. Lots of bugs but most of them are visual (double cigarettes) or fairly minor (derpy AI). A few quests bugs (I had like 2-3 bugs in 160h). It run flawlessly, and have solid content to do. Optimization is very well done, I run it at max with no problem.

I can't even run Odyssey.

Well I think at launch it was sort of similar to EDO: some people with great hardware had questionable performance compared to those who had lesser hardware. It's somewhat rectified now but at launch it certainly wasn't unanimously great.

 

[Erei]

Well I think at launch it was sort of similar to EDO: some people with great hardware had questionable performance compared to those who had lesser hardware. It's somewhat rectified now but at launch it certainly wasn't unanimously great.

I heard it was mostly console. Perhaps some AMD cards, but it was quickly fixed. Most people I heard never had optimization issue.

 

[Mogen Teras]

Most people I heard never had optimization issue.

Eh, guess it depends on where you look. I followed the Nvidia and AMD subreddits at the time and lots of people were scratching their heads at the performance they were getting with Cyberpunk. Like it wasn't AWFUL but certainly not what they were expecting compared to other games they played.

 

[Lone_star]

I heard it was mostly console. Perhaps some AMD cards, but it was quickly fixed. Most people I heard never had optimization issue.

I mean I don't think they released without finishing the frame renderer or implementing occlusion culling.

 

[Mogen Teras]

I mean I don't think they released without finishing the frame renderer or implementing occlusion culling.

Oh lordy if that ain't the truth. I laugh and cry at once reading this.

 

[wingus]

or maybe they implemented bitcoins miner inside game, we moaning loud, they lauthing loud

 

[Mogen Teras]

I heard it was mostly console. Perhaps some AMD cards, but it was quickly fixed. Most people I heard never had optimization issue.

I just wanted to point out that you inspired me to jump back into X4 again, and I'm having a lot of fun. So cheers for that.

 

[Erei]

I just wanted to point out that you inspired me to jump back into X4 again, and I'm having a lot of fun. So cheers for that.

Lol. You're like the 3rd I heard I inspired to go on X4 and who is enjoying his time there
And I don't even do it on purpose^^

I'm glad you have fun

 

[Mogen Teras]

Lol. You're like the 3rd I heard I inspired to go on X4 and who is enjoying his time there
And I don't even do it on purpose^^

I'm glad you have fun

Like I already had like 300 hours in it before, but I had put it down in anticipation of EDO. I think my fun is also further enhanced because of how bad a time I had with EDO.

 

[Einsiedler]

I'm still waiting for fixing this game, at stations or some planats fps goes down to almost 15 fps, this is not acceptable. Why FDEVS not doing priority to make the game playable for everyone who was able to play it before, but not after odyssey. At Horizons i had everywhere in the game my fps cap at 65 fps without problems. I don't care for fixing some in-game-bugs or adding new features, if i CANNOT PLAY the game, because around 15 fps at many parts of the game is just ridiculous.

Please fix finally!

 

[Mogen Teras]

I'm still waiting for fixing this game, at stations or some planats fps goes down to almost 15 fps, this is not acceptable. Why FDEVS not doing priority to make the game playable for everyone who was able to play it before, but not after odyssey. At Horizons i had everywhere in the game my fps cap at 65 fps without problems. I don't care for fixing some in-game-bugs or adding new features, if i CANNOT PLAY the game, because around 15 fps at many parts of the game is just ridiculous.

Please fix finally!

But didn't you see?? They changed some UI buttons to be GOLD instead of BLUE!! They're making PrOgReSs!!

 

[MacIntoc]

Why FDEVS not doing priority to make the game playable for everyone who was able to play it before, but not after odyssey

The same reason we don't have a ship interior : Odyssey needs to provide meaningful gameplay to justify the investment to make it playable.



HO SH|T !!

 

[Mogen Teras]

The same reason we don't have a ship interior : Odyssey needs to provide meaningful gameplay to justify the investment to make it playable.



HO SH|T !!

oh my god, are we STILL having this debate? People have proven time and time again that there's plenty they could do with interiors in terms of gameplay. Acting like there's nothing FDev could possibly add with interiors is just being willfully blind.

 

[Erei]

oh my god, are we STILL having this debate? People have proven time and time again that there's plenty they could do with interiors in terms of gameplay. Acting like there's nothing FDev could possibly add with interiors is just being willfully blind.

(I think it was sarcasm).

 

[Mogen Teras]

(I think it was sarcasm).

Hi apparently I woke up today dumb ._.

 

[Erei]

Hi apparently I woke up today dumb ._.

It's ok, I woke every day dumb. And go to bed the same way.

 

[Vekt Ey'doom]

I'm not recommending Odyssey until the performance is equal to Horizons.

Then you will never recommend Odyssey.

 

[MacIntoc]

(I think it was sarcasm).

I'm. But i am more and more worried that FDev is not

oh my god, are we STILL having this debate? People have proven time and time again that there's plenty they could do with interiors in terms of gameplay. Acting like there's nothing FDev could possibly add with interiors is just being willfully blind.

I have no doubt about player's imagination. FDev, in the other hand

 

[danteuk]

Resolving the performance issues so that the average player can get decent frames whilst not murdering their GPU should be top priority in my opinion, or EDO will be consigned to the garbage bin on sites like steam. And deservedly so.

I totally agree.
730+ fixes so far and it still runs like a dog with broken legs.
What's the point of 730+ fixes if so many players are not bothering to play due to such bad performance ?

I've basically only played for a couple of hours in the last 3 weeks, each time after an update to see if it's actually got any better. It hasn't. The next time I fire up EDO will be after the next update on the 1st of July - if the game still borders on unplayable in settlements then I might as well uninstall because by then they will have fixed probably a 1000 bugs - in this full release ( that we all know is a Beta ) but because they decided to focus on all the low hanging fruit and UI fixes instead of making the game actually playable they are going to lose more players then they will gain.

Seriously, who in their right mind would buy EDO in it's current state?, given all the negative reviews and justified criticism?

Unless you really like playing by yourself, exploring, and just taking nice screenshots and some pretty videos of sunsets or sunrises on thin atmospheric planets. Just avoid any settlements, avoid any on-foot combat and don't bother wasting any time doing the point-n-click exobiology.

Currently the ONLY selling point of Odyssey is the nice screenshots and videos of some choice tenuous atmospheric planets - that's it - nothing else in the entire release is worth a damn or what most players actually wanted or expected from Odyssey.
( unless you are one of the lucky one whose hardware somehow manages to cope or you are just happy to lower your settings and resolution until it's playable and ugly. )