You'll get banned for mentioning a moment a CM broke the rules?No, because i'll literally get banned.
You'll get banned for mentioning a moment a CM broke the rules?No, because i'll literally get banned.
But I've named devs specifically a lot. Are you saying just directing a thread at a dev got him banned?They gave the reason: naming a dev specifically. From memory.
Impossible, it's too subjective, just like what I pasted below from the official statement.Define "social offense", please.
Disagree. I can very clearly control myself as an adult to not say something that is harmful towards someone.Impossible, it's too subjective, just like what I pasted below from the official statement.
"...or are deemed harmful towards individual members of staff or teams..."
It's way too broad, and subjective.
That's exactly what I mean. You've never been banned for doing exactly the same thing that he was ostensibly banned for.But I've named devs specifically a lot. Are you saying just directing a thread at a dev got him banned?
We all read that post, mate.
Harmful means nothing.Disagree. I can very clearly control myself as an adult to not say something that is harmful towards someone.
As can you. Even a list of examples of what meets that criteria wouldn't cover all possibilities. Take ownership of yourself.
Completely agree with this. I am often shocked by how much doesn't get moderated. There was a thread here recently in which someone was basically berating men in general for our pathetic love of "guns and violence", and saying that our base instincts were the reason that Odyssey wasn't more focused on exploration. Apparently that was fine.The other odd curiosity was how the statement didn't extend to players being absusive towards other players. I would sincerely hope the moderators are considering doing so even though that behaviour is not a concern to the issue.....
I'd suggest you learn what it means then.Harmful means nothing.
We all read that post.That's exactly what I mean. You've never been banned for doing exactly the same thing that he was ostensibly banned for.
The only conclusion is that the ban was arbitrary.
It's subjective, look up that word.I'd suggest you learn what it means then.
I don't need to, I'm not the one confused by what harmful means in this context.It's subjective, look up that word.
My understanding is that that was literally what the ban was for.We all read that post.
It's disingenuous to suggest the ban was for what you said.
Did you report it for sexism?Completely agree with this. I am often shocked by how much doesn't get moderated. There was a thread here recently in which someone was basically berating men in general for our pathetic love of "guns and violence", and saying that our base instincts were the reason that Odyssey wasn't more focused on exploration. Apparently that was fine.
You'll get banned for mentioning a moment a CM broke the rules?
I didn't ban him. And I'm suggesting you actually haven't any actual proof of why he was banned either.My understanding is that that was literally what the ban was for.
Did the post seem like abuse to you?
I'm getting upset, you're harming me right now.I don't need to, I'm not the one confused by what harmful means in this context.
I'm crystal clear on the post. I'm fully capable of controlling myself so as to not say something to a dev that even has the remote chance of causing subjective harm to them.
Are you suggesting that is beyond you? Why do you need this defined? Is it your intent to say stuff that might subjectively cause harm but you'd like to find the line so you can push right up against it?
You know what an abusive message looks like. Please stop pretending you don't just for the sake of controversy.