Hollywood would NEVER lie like that. It would be shameful.
I know it's weird.. hopefully someone on the internet can shed light on this apparent lie. You can trust the internet.
Hollywood would NEVER lie like that. It would be shameful.
Well, if Raxxla was found but not named Raxxla how would anyone know it was Raxxla?by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?
Haha, Ender's never found Raxxla!by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?
how indeed.. but the idea that eddb would have it because they have most of the named systems doesn't have any connection to raxxla. there is no evidence that raxxla is named ...and plenty of evidence that nothing identifying anything that has been checked out is raxxla (and eddb would contain just things that have been checked out).Well, if Raxxla was found but not named Raxxla how would anyone know it was Raxxla?
More complete than what?eddb is more complete on named systems
Where has that been established? I admit I'm probably ignorant. I only just started my second year of Elite Dangerous a few weeks back.except raxxla as a named system or planet doesn't exist at all...
I'll accept this argument once my lawyers have told me that THEY understand it...so what would make raxxla be within eddb if eddb is more complete on named systems? which has already been established, raxxla is not.
He has yet to realise that it can be found in the same place as his sense of humour.Haha, Ender's never found Raxxla!
Haha, Ender's never found Raxxla!
only at fun events (some even include the traditional headwear from the era of adam west)
you can search for the names of stellar objects in the galaxy map. anything actually named that would show up (except back when it would also crash the system sometimes).Where has that been established? I admit I'm probably ignorant. I only just started my second year of Elite Dangerous a few weeks back.
By that logic, Raxxla should be in there too. Did you search for that?
Of course not.... Why, that would be unthinkable
As many of the self-professed 'explorers' I read posting on the forum have about as much imagination as the average rock...
Years ago the first discovered information wasn't visible in game so Michael Brooks raided the database to let CMDR's know how many discoveries they had made to date - 3rd February 2015.by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?
Exactly.Raxxla isn't the system... It is a body in a system... Think about it.
Relax, take a DEEP breath. Let it go........you can search for the names of stellar objects in the galaxy map. anything actually named that would show up (except back when it would also crash the system sometimes).
Now granted, they could have purposely ignored the text "raxxla" despite it actually being named that... but such a thing would be a very poor way to hide something you dont want to be found except by someone really out to find it. not just some person honking a system or passing thru.
so it's extremely reasonable to assume that the galaxy map not finding it means it's just not named raxxla in the map. It would be incredibly stupid of fdev to have a lost/missing thing actually labeled and located. Sure it wouldn't be the first time they goofed. .. but that would be pretty bad.