oddly, out of all the events we've been to...none have involved bowls of keys.
I get the feeling that practice is either extinct or entirely misrepresented. It doesn't happen in real events (the whole leaving alone with a partner).
State of the Game
- Thread starter Fuglydog53
- Start date
I get the feeling that practice is either extinct or entirely misrepresented. It doesn't happen in real events (the whole leaving alone with a partner).
Oh, you meant the Raxxla bit. Yes, that was me being logical, based on your statement to which I was replying.
The "Maury" bit was just irrational, lack of effort rudeness on my part. Please excuse me...
Last edited:
Urban legend realm then?
No, he didn't... read what he wrote again... the logic stool has been yours all along...
Logic is the explorer's imagination, isn't it?
yea... that would just be not only dangerous (in a large enough party where you'd think that would happen) ...but the logistics of everyone getting to their proper home later would be annoying... plus it's just kinda not the point when you goto a party like that. you go to watch. the whole key thing defeats the purpose. it just doesn't make sense. I think it might have happened here and there but it's mostly a hollywood type fabrication.
Hollywood would NEVER lie like that. It would be shameful.
when you use "by that logic" you're making a logical statement you believe is based on the logic of another statement. It's that interpretation that was what was being responded to and refuted by me as not making any sense. Because the idea that eddb catalogs named systems at a higher total % than all systems in general and being usable as a resource for them ...has absolutely nothing to do with then finding raxxla in there.
Yes it does.
except raxxla as a named system or planet doesn't exist at all... so what would make raxxla be within eddb if eddb is more complete on named systems? which has already been established, raxxla is not.
I know it's weird.. hopefully someone on the internet can shed light on this apparent lie. You can trust the internet.
Well, if Raxxla was found but not named Raxxla how would anyone know it was Raxxla?
Haha, Ender's never found Raxxla!
how indeed.. but the idea that eddb would have it because they have most of the named systems doesn't have any connection to raxxla. there is no evidence that raxxla is named ...and plenty of evidence that nothing identifying anything that has been checked out is raxxla (and eddb would contain just things that have been checked out).
if raxxla is in the game, it would not be discoverable from any kind of meta data gleamed from the sources that people have been trying to utilize for years. it's not in the data there. so it's useless for the search for raxxla. about as useless as searching for raxxla in general is.
More complete than what?
Does it pick up every system discovered?
Where has that been established? I admit I'm probably ignorant. I only just started my second year of Elite Dangerous a few weeks back.
I'll accept this argument once my lawyers have told me that THEY understand it...
He has yet to realise that it can be found in the same place as his sense of humour.
hypothetically if I did find it, I would allegedly have been given an NDA by FDev to not admit to finding it or letting anyone know it's location or hint at it until the time that Fdev decided to reveal that info themselves.
Not something one normally admits to but you do you B Ender.
Reading in another thread that the pay from exploration is poor...
But, I did have to do a few LY to get there, I suppose...
But, I did have to do a few LY to get there, I suppose...