The Goat game had more realistic physics than SC.Have found secret candid photographs of Chris Roberts playing SC. Shh, don't tell anyone. (...)
Oh and Starglider 2 (1988, Amiga) had space whales.
The Goat game had more realistic physics than SC.Have found secret candid photographs of Chris Roberts playing SC. Shh, don't tell anyone. (...)
I loved starglider and starglider 2 on the amiga... and (sad geek alert) i still have the music on my amiga game themes music playlist ----- and yes i realise its technically cheating as it was a tape in the box. (I really like Dave Lowe / Uncle Art . (am sure anyone remotely interested in this topic will know he did the Frontier Elite 2 theme as well)The Goat game had more realistic physics than SC.
Oh and Starglider 2 (1988, Amiga) had space whales.
it is interesting about how they are chatting about the vocal minority of players who dont want to PvP whining about being blown up for lolz........ maybe this is true of the playerbase in SC - i dont know - but my understanding is in many MMOs the opposite is true.SaltEMike discusses combat logging in SC....
No worries, i'm sure that CIG can solve this with some magic tech. After all, everyone knows ED only has combat logging because its P2P whereas SC is client/server.
it is interesting about how they are chatting about the vocal minority of players who dont want to PvP whining about being blown up for lolz........ maybe this is true of the playerbase in SC - i dont know - but my understanding is in many MMOs the opposite is true.
IME, not only is the opposite true in most MMOs, but the “asymmetrical PvP” crowd would inevitably be the true vocal minority, and a tiny one at that. Even in the MMOs explicitly designed to be “PvPers paradises” which I had tried in my youth. Of course, most of the latter inevitably failed because PvPers tend not to stick with any particular game in the long term, leaving behind the type of PvPer who prefers easy wins to generate salt, and PvP is best when it’s a fair fight.it is interesting about how they are chatting about the vocal minority of players who dont want to PvP whining about being blown up for lolz........ maybe this is true of the playerbase in SC - i dont know - but my understanding is in many MMOs the opposite is true.
I particularly liked the reply to that post..."The Fyre Festival of gaming."
I'm remembering that one.
anecdotal evidence, gut feeling and +60% funding...So the way you seem to be establishing the "success" of SC so far has been solely via anecdotal evidence and your gut feeling.
The funding itself is unclear. It has never been audited publicly by an independent third party so we do not really know what goes in that tracker, nor if it is accurate. We do not even know from where it comes; CIG has even decided to withdraw and hide the revenue origin info from their UK side of reports. CIG does not even show basic elements in their financial blog such as a balance sheet etc.anecdotal evidence, gut feeling and +60% funding...
anecdotal evidence, gut feeling and +60% funding...
downfall of the skeptics >>> yes
The amount of skeptics will not regenerate by itself. It is only dismishing patch after patch.
And some people will critic any news about CIG right ?
They are rare now...
The Fyre Festival happened
If it reassure you in your belief that SC is in bad shape, why notThe funding itself is unclear.
...
So we are back to your totally unbiased gut feeling I guess?
100% money laundering. That much money without oversight or accountability? Crook's wet dream.The funding itself is unclear.
Even if it is true what does it tell us? It's not like the more money CIG gets, the faster the game is coming outIf it reassure you in your belief that SC is in bad shape, why not![]()
Even if it is true what does it tell us? It's not like the more money CIG gets, the faster the game is coming out![]()
So you're saying ... bedsheet laundering, not money launderingBut... but... bedsheet physics!
If it reassure you in your belief that SC is in bad shape, why not![]()