Gemai,
in the example above are the factions now showing as communist on the gal map and system map & acting as communist for the purposes of conflicts?
There is no such thing as galaxy map rule.
Triggers for PP are a galaxy map rule that affects the fortification and expansion. That aside.
I told you of TWO systems to check if you want proof. Now I tell you a third cluster. You can ask them, it is a PMF as well.
RSM has lost control of Bahmian to the local pirates due to their war enemy. With now most of their "system" assets outside of Wonga ruled by anarchists, Wonga has now turned to ANARCHY on the map. RSM is a Theocracy.
The BGS effects PP triggers etc, not the other way around. If a control system has >50% of exploited systems that have a favourable govt type the trigger is halved, if it has >50% unfavourable govt type the triggers are doubled. The rest of PP control is largely meaningless to the BGS other than some benefits to pledged cmdrs in terms of influence effects.
That's interesting. +1. I wouldn't have thought it would work that way. I'll have to check the maps tonight when I get home.
<edit> I'd assume that it doesn't affect trade and such in the home system (Wonga in this case) though. Does it? </edit>
The BGS effects PP triggers etc, not the other way around.
As Flin has said the Galmap is not always accurate. it is hugely improved but for more than a year it did not show changes in system government etc. There may still be some legacies of that time.
<edit> I'd assume that it doesn't affect trade and such in the home system (Wonga in this case) though. Does it? </edit>
This really looks like yet another map bug to me.
True enough, but the question is: Does it effect PP triggers? If not FD might be able to ignore it quite long... if it does affect triggers one should address it quickly.
Best of luck getting it seen to in the current development/post 2.2 bug fix/balancing rage environment!