Err, that is one of the things about notoriety. If you want to block the ability to pay it off even at notoriety 0, enjoy the complete meltdown of the forum when people experience what that means.![]()
yessss!!! prrlleeeeassseeee!!! [haha]
Err, that is one of the things about notoriety. If you want to block the ability to pay it off even at notoriety 0, enjoy the complete meltdown of the forum when people experience what that means.![]()
Err, that is one of the things about notoriety. If you want to block the ability to pay it off even at notoriety 0, enjoy the complete meltdown of the forum when people experience what that means.![]()
The notoriety system is a complete disaster at best anyway. I'd welcome a change that did not allow bounties to simply be paid off like fines....
Honestly, I genuinely preferred bounties the way they used to be.
You'd incur a bounty for something and then you'd have a week, or whatever, where you kept getting hassled by bounty-hunters and you could decide whether to remain on the run until the bounty expired or you could fill 'em full of lead and be an outlaw.
I don't think the consequences of incurring a bounty were anywhere near harsh enough (having a bounty on you should attract cop-ships and BHers in proportion to the seriousness of your crimes) but the basic system was fairly reasonable IMO.
I selected that and saw it would cost me 809,000 credits. Jaw on the floor ... This is now simply absurd.
Agreed. A fine and a bounty should be delineated. Today, they are not.Parking ticket is a fine, not a bounty. To be honest, the bounties for inadvertent shooting are ridiculously low. They should be a lot higher, say in the 1000s to make it clear they are not fines. It would avoid a lot of misunderstandings.
complaining about this outcome sounds more like axe grinding a chip on the shoulder, rather than a scenario with anything wrong.