Well the only real difference between a skeleton of a wolf and a husky is the size. The anatomy is almost identical to every extent.
Carcharodontosaurus design:
- Thread starter impcaeaug
- Start date
Well the only real difference between a skeleton of a wolf and a husky is the size. The anatomy is almost identical to every extent.
Do what?
So what's the difference from the two pictures? Besides the head being a cm taller on the edit?
That a cm that make the dino looks like what it represent
My left eye is actually a bit lower than the right, since no person is symmetrical. And no it doesn't change the person I am at all. Haha. I'm still exactly the same as I would be, if I was symmetric. And the only difference between hares and rabbits are the size. Longer legs and longer ears. That's it. And the color of course. And it's def not a difference as small as the one you posted... You can barely see it with the naked eye. And it's an extinct animal that no one knows what looked liked in the first place.
And none of the dinosaurs in the franchise probably looks like they did in real life. That's the whole point. Human made themepark monsters.
Last edited:
The difference between a hare and a rabbit are not little changes. It's a completely different anatomy. Which is def not the case here...
They DON'T have a lot of differences... Almost nothing at all. Maybe that's why they felt like making the skull a centimeter lower. And yes the Velociraptor and Deinonychus is obviously very similar since the JP Velociraptor is based on the Deinonychus and is basically the same animal just made bigger.
The only difference between Carchar and Giga is the minor differences in the skull, that's almost impossible to see with the naked eye. Everybody can see the size differences between hares and rabbits plus the different legs and ears. That's a huge difference. And the same goes for Velociraptor and Deinonychus. The Velociraptor in JP is a Deinonychus?
It's like comparing a shoe with different laces. There's almost no difference. But if you compare it to another shoe model it's a different story. A hare and rabbit are different "shoes" the Carchar and Giga are different laces... That's pretty easy to see.
I could understand if the model needed to be reworked, but it's only a fraction of the head that needs changing. To an animal we'll never know how looked. It's so overkill.
Last edited:
Exactly. There's pretty much no difference in the skulls, but the whole body is different. The only thing that needs editing on the Carchar is a centimeter raise on the snout. It's so comical and the pictures you posted that were edited didn't make the animal different at all. It would just be a waste of time... And again, non of the dinosaurs are accurate.
KiryuCPR, can you differentiate a bison with a wisent? Or an ocelot with a margay? A humboldt with a magellanic penguin? An aligator with a caiman? Or maybe...a monarch with a viceroy butterfly?
You seem so knowledgeable on animal anatomy, so allow me to test you. Think of it as a fun challenge, not a threat message.
You seem so knowledgeable on animal anatomy, so allow me to test you. Think of it as a fun challenge, not a threat message.
But why do it, when it changes nothing... SMH
And you can never tell from fossils how chunky an animal was, so it really has no point at all.
The animals I mentioned are pretty similar in terms of physical appearance and behaviors. Habitat and gene-wise are obviously different. Kinda like this Charcharodontosaurus and Acrocanthosaurus thing, which I dunno why the heck this thread is resurrected after about a few months...Exactly.
No idea either. It will not be changed anyway... I just wanted to understand the fuzz. haha
Well, I believe your answers are correct. Congrats!
On a side note, why the heck are you concerned about dino anatomy? If you have no problem with these animals I've asked you differentiate in terms of appearance, why do you seem so upset on a creature gone long before we exist? We only know dinos through fossils, and they tell a small portion of who they are.
Remember: Nothing in the Jurassic Franchise is accurate, that's why velociraptors are big and featherless, stegosaurus had a droopy tail, Baryonyx had a skin of a croc, etc. If you have no problem with these abominations (maybe you do), why speak out against a silly horn above a Charcharodontosaurus?
On a side note, why the heck are you concerned about dino anatomy? If you have no problem with these animals I've asked you differentiate in terms of appearance, why do you seem so upset on a creature gone long before we exist? We only know dinos through fossils, and they tell a small portion of who they are.
Remember: Nothing in the Jurassic Franchise is accurate, that's why velociraptors are big and featherless, stegosaurus had a droopy tail, Baryonyx had a skin of a croc, etc. If you have no problem with these abominations (maybe you do), why speak out against a silly horn above a Charcharodontosaurus?
Comparing what? Muscle etc aren't preserved, so everything is guesses.
Yeah the arms and head is different. Just like the game.
Yes I understand you're totally nitpicking... You have no idea how this animal looked, so stop acting like it. It's getting ridiculous. They won't bother to make changes you can't see anyway...
And that head looks like the Giga. Not totally different at all.
Hahhahahaha. So because you've drawn a dinosaur that's been extinct for millions of years, you know what it looks like. I'M DEAD. That's the most ignorant post I've ever read on this forum.
What does two almost identical skulls have to do with two different species we have today? You're reaching so bad. And basically everybody on here is saying the Carchar and Giga skull is almost identical. And that's a straight fact. They are. And if they do a Tarbosaurus it has to be almost identical to the Rex, since the fossils are as well? So what's your point.
You want Frontier to use workhours on changing something no one will ever notice. That's an insult to their work imo. And it will never be changed anyway, so this discussion is just a plain waste of time.
Hmmmm... Which is which.
Last edited:
No paleoartist in the world knows what these animals looked like? Everything is guesses. Have you seen them in real life? No. I've read alot of information in my life that wasn't true. This is exactly the reason people believe in religion. If it's written down it has to be right?
Frontier doesn't owe anything to Paul Sereno. They are not accurate dinosaurs any of them. These are Universal dinosaurs. You should be able to figure that out. Hahah.
Point out the Tarbo from the other post.