So I think we’ve been given a lot of clarity on what will be happening with PZ and the now inevitable PZ2 (because it’s almost certainly coming at this point, sooner rather than later too). And I think it all fits well with the current discussion (quoted comments) below:
I mean its anyones guess at this point.
Personally i think having alot of dlc animals in the basegame is somewhat reasonable, but some key species will be held back.
Keeping the star animals out to headline packs with a different cast of filler animals essentially.
Like having sheep, reindeer and wolf from the arctic pack in the basegame but keeping the polar bear out to headline another arctic pack with musk ox, hare and snowy owl for example.
The now official announcement of PC2, the way Frontier is marketing it, and the beginning bits of info that are being released about it tell us the direction Frontier is taking on things with Planet series games (particularly how they’ll handle sequel titles). It’s clear from Frontier-provided copy/text that the base game for PC2 will not have everything that was featured in PC1, including most if not all of the DLC content. Additionally, most of the initial marketing for PC2 has been largely branding the game as a waterpark CMS (obviously with coasters still being a key element but the advertising focus clearly isn’t there). Another important piece is specifically the fact that most PC1 base game themes won’t be showing up in PC2 (at least upon initial release).
A lot can be gathered from this. And a lot should be if you want to make a truly-informed guess of what’s to be expected from Frontier moving forward. Frontier definitely made all of their announcement decisions for PC2 strategically and under the guidance of “marketing” experts (and likely invested serious amounts of time & money into what’s needed in PC2 and it’s advertising to make it sell well).
All this said, the same things will almost certainly apply to a potential PZ2 (especially if Frontier has it slated to be a soon-to-come release). Base game PZ2 isn’t going to feature all the DLC animals, and likely even a good amount of PZ1’s base game roster. Initial marketing for a PZ2 would emphasize and focus on species that would’ve never worked in PZ1 (whether that’s fully aquatics, free-flying birds, more-freely moving “exhibit” animals, or true nocturnal/light-sensitive species). Yes, there would still be some of the species we’ve encountered in PZ1, but none of them would be Frontier’s intended consumer draw for the new game. Advertisings wouldn’t be headlined by terrestrial megafauna (lions, elephants, etc.), like we saw in PZ1. At least for the initial marketing for PZ2. The game needs to be branded
initially as something with a different “flavor” than PZ1.
How's this idea for a Coastal Animal Pack?
View attachment 397266
Let's flip it around, the brown pelican is the only animal that actually has a chance in a coastal pack like that.
Which brings me to my final point and how it’s all relevant to what we can still be expecting for PZ1. I’m not going to dive into the evidence for how many DLC PZ1 has left (though I personally think the odds aren’t likely for more than one), but I can pretty confidently say that whatever is still coming for PZ, it won’t be anything that in some way could support the “new twist/flavor” that a PZ2 would come with. And this even goes for species that could still, mechanically speaking, work in PZ1 but strongly support themes/mechanics that are currently untouched (walrus, sea otter, sea turtles, pelicans, green anaconda, king cobra, small rodents, most birds, etc.) Though these are all things I’d personally love to still see in PZ1 (one of my most wanted DLCs is something coastal-themed), all the evidence points towards Frontier saving ALL of this for a PZ2.
Now we wait.