Patch Notes Update Elite: Dangerous Update 1.05 Change Log

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I stopped reading here. In my experience it goes downhill once something like gender gets needlessly involved.

But good luck with your intentions. Might I suggest a more helpful attitude and maybe fine tuning your vocabulary a bit - cheating and disrespectful somehow does not feel appropriate
If a game system cheats you out of credits what would you call it. Then when you are informed that there are no plans to refund those credits, to me that is a clear comment that the person concerned is showing disrespect to players when other bugs that have caused loss have been refunded.
 
Well, wouldn't you know - I had already repented, and went looking before you even posted that...
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=93710&p=1457109&viewfull=1#post1457109

Not sure what else there is, I've got better things to do than other people's research, and besides, that fact remains that the price paid was as intended before, and as you paid what FD intended for you to pay then there's no reason to refund it.

-- Pete.

Actually the ship discount thing is a little confusing...

https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=99302&p=1541451&viewfull=1#post1541451
 
I would like to know, if players who bought a Ship there recently and made a Ticket afterwards because they dont got the discount, can now expect a refund for the missing credits. It would be really nice if Frontier would do that :)

Having raised a ticket on this after buying my Lakon Type-7 and since, buying a Python there, I would like to know this too!
 
So to offer a 57 million credit ship for just over 51 million then charge you the 57 million leaving you with no credits to safely work it is constructive to game play is it sunshine.

You had the option to sell it back and buy a cheaper ship when you realised that it was costing more than you thought. Consider it a run-in with an unscrupulous used spaceship salesman - the universe doesn't have to be fair.

I see so you make a statement quoting an unfounded source then expect me to find it for you. Sorry I don't think so.

You asked a question, were given an answer, Pete doesn't want you to find the post for him, it's you that wants the information so use the search.
 
Seriously? Closing a ticket without resolving the issue is a BAD customer experience. Each ticket has a person behind it who spent the time typing up details to report it. Perhaps they're trying to clear up backlog, but to be honest the convenience of the support staff does not outweigh their customers. Unless they provided you with a resource to track its resolution or progress, its tantamount to fobbing you off.

It's industry standard practice as defined by ITIL.

When you have multiple incidents (individual fault tickets) all dealing with the same issue a problem record is opened and the information from each ticket is added to it.

Sometimes the originating tickets will be left open until the problem is resolved but when you have a large number of tickets related to the problem then they will often be closed.

The information typed in by the person who logged it won't be lost, it'll have been recorded with all the other reports.

When you have a small organisation with a new product that is generating thousands of tickets it's the only way to keep track of things properly. How many tickets do you think have been raised for the landing bay bug for example? Probably hundreds. They can't sift through each and every ticket in search of information. It has to be in one place so it can be searched effectively.

I don't know how large the support team is at Frontier. I know they are recruiting for more but with the best will in the world there are only so many competent support professionals available in any area at any given time so the recruiting process can take a while.
 
Last edited:
Oh well such is life in the gaming world. FD obviously has issues they deem important to resolve even though many of us don't have a clue what they are talking about. Thus when issues like fixing the landing pad lights/numbers blinking out which we as players do understand are not resolved then there are concerns. Here's a FD pick the right answer list:

1. We are aware of the landing pad issue.
2. We are aware of the landing pad issue but other issues are more important.
3. We are aware of the landing pad issue but don't know how to fix it yet.
4. We are aware of the landing pad issue and know how to fix it but other updates may break it again.
5. The landing pad issue is not a bug, but a feature!

Best to All

6. We are aware of the landing pad issue and are working on it but the fix isn't ready yet. ;)

7. We are aware of the landing pad issue but it's actually really tricky to fix that without potentially breaking a load of other things, so we'll leave that until we have the hood up for another reason.
 
Well, wouldn't you know - I had already repented, and went looking before you even posted that...
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=93710&p=1457109&viewfull=1#post1457109

Not sure what else there is, I've got better things to do than other people's research, and besides, that fact remains that the price paid was as intended before, and as you paid what FD intended for you to pay then there's no reason to refund it.

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by kfriman Michael, are you SURE the ship price discount is working properly, I have been charged twice "the normal", not the displayed amount when bying ship, Type-7 and Asp more specific and not so many days ago.
I believe the discount was supposed to be just for the outfitting. The benefit for the ships was that there is a good selection.

Michael

-- Pete.

So M.B. Says that he believes, not that it is supposed to be that way. Now the latest patch shows that belief was misplaced. That is not a statement from M.B. just an opinion of a fact he wasn't sure of.
I think had he been sure he would have had the ships withdrawn until so called bug was settled.
 
I would suspect that after the "Founder World Exploit" where people were buying modules and selling them at a profit elsewhere, FD have double and triple checked the implications of modifying the ship price, and that whatever the buy/sell prices of those ships are, it is entirely what is intended, and both non-exploitable, and non-punishing.

I'd be very disappointed at anything other than that to be honest.

-- Pete.

I hope so. Because when I buy a Ship which is listed in the founders world at 51 Millions including the discount for example but got the "real" 57 Millions withdrawn from my balance (because of the bug) without that this "real" value got correctly stored (because maybe it stores the displayed value) then, when I sell that ship again, I would only get 45 millions for it, because the system thinks I had payed 51 Millions for it in the first place (which is wrong in that case).
So I would have made a 12 Million loss (57-45 ) instead of 6 millions (57-51 or 51-45) as any other player would have payed, who bought outside of the founder system or inside after the bug got fixed. The numbers are only examples but I think they show the problem. And the more expensive the ships get, the larger the unjustified loss would be.
Sure it will only affect a small number of players but because of that it should also be no problem to refund them. Why make them unhappy ? They have done nothing wrong.

But I will accept the decision Frontier will make in that case, even if I may not like it. But I think a refund would a the better solution.
 
"AnydyWller" Are the coms issues fixed?

I say rid the voice coms as I don't actually need it & I'm presuming most players are using alternatives already like teamspeak. I would rather they replace it with real time intergalactic text terminal or something in that line.
 
Last edited:
That's the same as going to the baker's shop, ordering a white loaf of bread. Baker gives you an empty bag with no bread in it. He expects you to pay 2 quid for the empty bag. When you say, there is no bread in it, the baker says to you: I am aware of the problem, I will fix it soon..... How does that analogy strike you?


No. It really isn't.

If you must reduce a complicated development problem to simplistic analogies it's more like buying a car and having a fault fixed under warranty. The dealer will do his best to fix the problem as quickly as possible but unless they know exactly what is causing the problem it will inevitably take some time to fix.
 
whilst it is not the ideal long term solution, whilst a fix is being sorted can you not use steamchat?

it is what i generally do when gaming. (not just in elite either)

Not saying it should not be fixed, just trying to offer temp bandaid fixes
Seriously who in their right mind ever uses steam chat? Teamspeak.
 
You had the option to sell it back and buy a cheaper ship when you realised that it was costing more than you thought. Consider it a run-in with an unscrupulous used spaceship salesman - the universe doesn't have to be fair.



You asked a question, were given an answer, Pete doesn't want you to find the post for him, it's you that wants the information so use the search.

So if I sold back the ship I would have lost 10% on the trade in value of the discounted price. I know that because I put the ship in to the PX box for a cobra to see how much I would lose. So having lost over 5 mill credits on the deal buying the Python through the as you put it , shady price description, I would have lost another 5 million on its trade in value too making around 10 million. Seems kind of lopsided to me.

By the way until you pay for the ship you think you are getting the discounted price it isn't until the buy button is actually pressed that the true amount is taken from you, so you are unaware this is about to happen.
 
Last edited:
If a game system cheats you out of credits what would you call it. Then when you are informed that there are no plans to refund those credits, to me that is a clear comment that the person concerned is showing disrespect to players when other bugs that have caused loss have been refunded.

Are you sure you read the right dictionary when you were young?

cheat
verb \ˈchēt\

: to break a rule or law usually to gain an advantage at something

: to take something from (someone) by lying or breaking a rule

: to prevent (someone) from having something that he or she deserves or was expecting to get


To me, all of these have an element of willfulness from the side of the cheater - Do you believe that Frontier was out to steal virtual credits from you. have they lied to you, what have they actively prevented?

Edit: I would like to add that I have spend more than 1 billion on outfitting in this game and were we to get a refund for this I would gain at least 20 million . But I do take issue with self-entitled, overly aggressive posts as yours. At best they help you to vent and, well, that's the "at best" scenario...
 
Last edited:
I sure believe it feels like silence, but in all honesty, have you seen how many answers Michael Brookes gives out every day? Sometimes there is just a minute between two posts...

People need to calm down a little. Even if the devs don't explain every little part of what they are working on right now in detail, they still give more feedback than the average forum user might be aware of.

Just look at Michaels profile and click at "recent posts". It looks like he is trying to answer as many questions as he can (even though - sadly - mine are not among those that get considered for a response :( ).

Of course there is silence and silence. The one I'm referring to is the silence regarding the bug reports and tickets. The fact they are making a lot of posts in reply to people's comments is a good thing, but that doesn't take away the need for feedback on bugs. A public place where bugs are cataloged (e.g. Mantis Bug Tracker) so we can see FD is aware of the issue is all I'm asking for. I'm sure it would take away the feeling of being ignored away from a lot of us. I'm not asking for timelines and such (although that would be great), just an easy accessible place where we can see we've been heard and what work is being done at the moment. If one dev can share what she is doing, so can the others right? I agree the community manager could play a role in this, so devs won't lose too much time posting here.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom