... a simple rollback on the affected code would resolve some of it.
You obviously don't work in coding if you think any rollback is simple
... a simple rollback on the affected code would resolve some of it.
You are a one man crusade, aren't you?
I wouldn't mind having more fixes and more of everything but I am also aware that they have been back to work for 8 days now and have released a few patches since then. The only one not showing respect in this thread is you.
How about you save you breath to cool your porridge, calm down and post when you have a more constructive attitude?
I would suspect that after the "Founder World Exploit" where people were buying modules and selling them at a profit elsewhere, FD have double and triple checked the implications of modifying the ship price, and that whatever the buy/sell prices of those ships are, it is entirely what is intended, and both non-exploitable, and non-punishing.What if someone sell a ship from the Founders world now ? Does the system "know" that I did not got the discount due to the bug in the first place and use the original value for the calculation or do I get some "double punishment" because the system gives me only the sell value based on the discounted price, because it don't know that I payed the full price because of the bug ? That would be really bad, because I would have been "robbed" when buying the ship and get robbed again when selling it.
It was always stated that the discounted ship prices listed in Founders World were an error, and that they should be charged at full price (which they were, which was indeed different from the listed price). The listed price was the bug, not the price charged.
Then FD made a decision that instead of changing the displayed prices to match what is charged (the same as everyone was paying everywhere) that they would reduce the actual price in Founders World to match the displayed price. This is (should be?) excellent news for everyone who has access to this station (Kickstarter Backers, some lucky/bugged Alpha/Beta backers, and anyone reaching Elite status in any category).
However, just because the price changes now, that doesn't mean that it is retrospectively changed for all past purchases, and it is not reasonable to expect this. If they change the prices of any given weapon or equipment at any time then I don't expect them to retroactively change the price anyone who ever bought that item will have paid.
I know I've paid full price for ships that were listed as discounted, but that the displayed price was the bug, not the price I paid. I also know that in future I will have the benefit of having cheaper ships available.
In other words: Suck it up Buttercup.
-- Pete.
I suspect that if you are leaving yourself with 'no credits to safely work' when charged 5.7 mil more than you expected for a 57 mil ship, then you were setting yourself up for trouble in the first place - I wouldn't even consider buying a ship unless I had double the asking price, so I could afford to even think about dropping half-decent modules into it.So to offer a 57 million credit ship for just over 51 million then charge you the 57 million leaving you with no credits to safely work it is constructive to game play is it sunshine.
...Not a one man crusade more a one woman crusade so don't make gender assumptions...
So to offer a 57 million credit ship for just over 51 million then charge you the 57 million leaving you with no credits to safely work it is constructive to game play is it sunshine.
Not a one man crusade more a one woman crusade so don't make gender assumptions.
It has nothing to do with the amount of time the Devs have been back at work it has to do with M.B. 's answer to others who have also asked about the discount being refunded.
Just to educate you, as you don't seem to be able to follow the full reasoning behind these complaints, after offering a discounted price at Jameson Memorial when you press buy you were charged the full price which you didn't know would happen until you paid out. M.B. has stated here there are no plans to give those that were cheated by a faulty game system the difference between what the offer for the ship was and what was actually paid. It is only game credits but those credits represent many hours of game play.
So how about you save your breath and stop criticizing those of us looking for a proper resolution to the problem. Which is a refund of the failed discount.
You obviously don't work in coding if you think any rollback is simple![]()
These are the ones accompanying this client release. Andy did a separate thread for the updates in 1.04.
Michael
Somewhere on the forums. Unfortunately I don't archive the URL to every post I ever read, so I'd need to search for it.Where was it stated please? Daisy
I would suspect that after the "Founder World Exploit" where people were buying modules and selling them at a profit elsewhere, FD have double and triple checked the implications of modifying the ship price, and that whatever the buy/sell prices of those ships are, it is entirely what is intended, and both non-exploitable, and non-punishing.
I'd be very disappointed at anything other than that to be honest.
-- Pete.
About the ships are discounted in founder planets.
So wealthy players can just buy the most expensive ship for discount and sell them in nearby station for profit to buy a eagle to fly back again and repeat it all over? That would suck
It isn't any different they just cannot be to show any customer loyalty or respect.
It's the silence that kills...
Somewhere on the forums. Unfortunately I don't archive the URL to every post I ever read, so I'd need to search for it.
I'm sure you're equally able to use the search tool, and given that you are the one who wants to know, I'll let you do the donkey work.
-- Pete.
I suspect that if you are leaving yourself with 'no credits to safely work' when charged 5.7 mil more than you expected for a 57 mil ship, then you were setting yourself up for trouble in the first place - I wouldn't even consider buying a ship unless I had double the asking price, so I could afford to even think about dropping half-decent modules into it.
-- Pete.
Well, wouldn't you know - I had already repented, and went looking before you even posted that...I see so you make a statement quoting an unfounded source then expect me to find it for you. Sorry I don't think so.