Like polar bears, they both are found in Svalbard. It's not the first animal I would associate with Europe, but they could be in such a pack.Walruses live in Europe?
Like polar bears, they both are found in Svalbard. It's not the first animal I would associate with Europe, but they could be in such a pack.Walruses live in Europe?
I'd much rather an animal endemic to Europe, or an animal widely associated with Europe. Walruses shouldn't be in a Europe pack in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't want Walruses in the game, they are pretty cool animals. But not in a Europe pack where they would take the place of an animal that breathes Europe.Like polar bears, they both are found in Svalbard. It's not the first animal I would associate with Europe, but they could be in such a pack.
I agree with you! I think the same about the horse for example.I'd much rather an animal endemic to Europe, or an animal widely associated with Europe. Walruses shouldn't be in a Europe pack in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't want Walruses in the game, they are pretty cool animals. But not in a Europe pack where they would take the place of an animal that breathes Europe.
Yes. Przwalski horses and Saiga antelopes for that matter are amazing and I'd love them in the game, but not in a Europe pack.I agree with you! I think the same about the horse for example.
Theres honestly one i would like to see, the tarpan.I agree with you! I think the same about the horse for example.
No it isn't; this is actually impossible. A bunch of new breeds have been created that resemble the tarpan but they are not at all related to the actual tarpans.An "extinct" species of wild horse, thats getting breed back into existance
Theres honestly one i would like to see, the tarpan.
An "extinct" species of wild horse, thats getting breed back into existance and is rather common in especally smaller zoos and wildparks.
The reason i put extinct in " is because they arnt fully extinct. Similar to for example the auroch they didnt really got wiped out, only the wild population was. Both have been domesticated with the tarpan being crossbred with other species of horses, meaning that their are still horses, that very much resemble tarpans.
There were even projects to reestablish a wild population, that sadly have lost most traction. But the breed is still alive and well, known as domestic tarpan or heck horse.
View attachment 274747
Technically, they could in theory de-extinct the actual Tarpan with cloning, but what they are currently doing with breeding is only creating a morphological doppleganger, as @NZFanatic said, it's not an actual Tarpan.No it isn't; this is actually impossible. A bunch of new breeds have been created that resemble the tarpan but they are not at all related to the actual tarpans.
Unrelated, but if you are interested, it is not impossible There are records of extinct species re-evolving into existence again, one particular noteable animal is the Aldabra rail which evolved from the white-throated rail and became extinct for 20,000 years. It then re-evolved from the white-throated rail again into the aldabra rail recently when the island re-emerged from the water.No it isn't; this is actually impossible. A bunch of new breeds have been created that resemble the tarpan but they are not at all related to the actual tarpans.
But the chances of this happening are astronomical. It requires:Unrelated, but if you are interested, it is not impossible There are records of extinct species re-evolving into existence again, one particular noteable animal is the Aldabra rail which evolved from the white-throated rail and became extinct for 20,000 years. It then re-evolved from the white-throated rail again into the aldabra rail recently when the island re-emerged from the water.
Yes it is! For the same reason I would love for the Tauros to come to the game one day. This is a breeding project that recreates the aurochs based on genetic traces and phenotypic elements found in existing cattle breeds. The aurochs itself has been gone for a couple hundred years, but their genes are still found dispersed in our domesticated cattle. So now it's like a puzzle, and finding the right animals that fit, mixing and matching, and in a few years we'll have a bovine with most of the genetic traits of an aurochs, most of the phenotypic traits of an aurochs, and for all intents and purposes is an aurochs. It's just that they can't call it an aurochs due to semantics, so the name is Tauros.Still a cool animal though
Nope, sorry, it’s more than semantics.... we'll have a bovine with most of the genetic traits of an aurochs, most of the phenotypic traits of an aurochs, and for all intents and purposes is an aurochs. It's just that they can't call it an aurochs due to semantics, so the name is Tauros.
...
I disagree. A lot is known about the aurochs and its role in the ecosystem, and their instincts and behavior is found in our modern-day cattle.Nope, sorry, it’s more than semantics.
As much as the re-bread animal may morphologically look like an aurochs, it doesn’t have the instincts and behavior of the extinct aurochs. It is basically just a re-skinned ( ) domestic animal.
And even if a certain “wilderness” is bred into the new race, we simply can not know, how a real aurochs would have acted. (All we have is pre-scientific descriptions.)
What is lost, is lost.
A ‘Tauros’ is basically just the Disney Land version of an extinct creature.
It's not actually the same species, so it didn't "re-evolve", unfortunately (that's just a meme and a catchy headline). The "new" Aldabra rail is actually a subspecies of the white-throated rail, morphologically near-identical to the extinct species but genetically closer to the white-throated rail.Unrelated, but if you are interested, it is not impossible There are records of extinct species re-evolving into existence again, one particular noteable animal is the Aldabra rail which evolved from the white-throated rail and became extinct for 20,000 years. It then re-evolved from the white-throated rail again into the aldabra rail recently when the island re-emerged from the water.
Ok, so that might work for the genetics, but species are not totally reducible to their genes. First, I’m guessing that you’re talking about the nuclear genome only (I.e., excluding mitochondrial genes). Second, species in action are additionally defined, in practice, by their parasitic load (including, for example, gut and other bacteria) which will, in many cases, have gone extinct with their host (symbiotic bacterial flora can have a substantial effect on how an organism functions within its ecosystem). Third, non genetic factors (e.g., epigenetics, maternal effects) also define species and populations. Fourth, social/cultural factors which can also substantially affect how populations function. (Nuclear) genes are a VERY important factor in defining species but they are not the only factor.All other characteristics of Aurochs are still found in modern-day cattle, and by using cattle with DNA sequences that match the aurochs genotype, you can reconstruct the aurochs by selective breeding. Or at least as close as is possible without the use of actual cloning techniques.
…
These points I do agree with. You know your stuff!Ok, so that might work for the genetics, but species are not totally reducible to their genes. First, I’m guessing that you’re talking about the nuclear genome only (I.e., excluding mitochondrial genes). Second, species in action are additionally defined, in practice, by their parasitic load (including, for example, gut and other bacteria) which will, in many cases, have gone extinct with their host (symbiotic bacterial flora can have a substantial effect on how an organism functions within its ecosystem). Third, non genetic factors (e.g., epigenetics, maternal effects) also define species and populations. Fourth, social/cultural factors which can also substantially affect how populations function. (Nuclear) genes are a VERY important factor in defining species but they are not the only factor.
These ‘re-evolved’ species are certainly cool and far from worthless (since they can fill vacated niches within ecosystems) but they do not represent genuine de-extinction or genuine re-evolution of a species - and this is far more than just semantics.