Ingame merit leaderboard against 5c

It probably has been said a bunch of times, probably missed it, but still... Wouldn't it be great if the Elite gave out the names and merits of all commanders who contributed in any way to PP? If it could be filtered to systems, 5c people would be exposed even from solo. Bots would have a hard time hiding themselves with the excessive grind, and systems visited.

Also leaderboards are cool.
 
I think of the 5C thing as more of an espionage game. If it were embraced that way and mechanics/tools were introduced for counter espionage it could add the whole class of spy vs spy and would (at least in my opinion) add a lot to the game.
However, I am not sure what would be needed to add to the game or what mechanics would allow for good gameplay, still as long as we are throwing out new ideas.
 
I think of the 5C thing as more of an espionage game. If it were embraced that way and mechanics/tools were introduced for counter espionage it could add the whole class of spy vs spy and would (at least in my opinion) add a lot to the game.
However, I am not sure what would be needed to add to the game or what mechanics would allow for good gameplay, still as long as we are throwing out new ideas.

You can theoretically counter it if you know who's doing it. That was my main proposal.

As for 5c from solo... Uh. C'mon.
 
I think of the 5C thing as more of an espionage game. If it were embraced that way and mechanics/tools were introduced for counter espionage it could add the whole class of spy vs spy and would (at least in my opinion) add a lot to the game.
However, I am not sure what would be needed to add to the game or what mechanics would allow for good gameplay, still as long as we are throwing out new ideas.

5C in Powerplay is essentially you voting to expand a poor system that wastes huge amounts of command capital. Its not espionage at all, its just a quirk thats a giant exploit. I once wrote a proposal for Powerplay that revolved around megaships, and the espionage part was you hacking them to find out flight plans for ambushes. In the current design is hard to see where espionage would fit except for espionage like missions. In my last proposal I had several missions that involved smuggling spies and saboteurs that would fit the bill in a constructive way.
 
What is wrong with leaderboards?
Personally, I don't like em, but thats my problem :)

When it comes to Elite... When the first version was made in the 80's of last millennium (I know, I know...), it distinguished itself from other games because it lacked a leaderboard (and it did not have the usual 3 lives). So in the light of that, I don't think we'll ever see one.
 
Personally, I don't like em, but thats my problem :)

When it comes to Elite... When the first version was made in the 80's of last millennium (I know, I know...), it distinguished itself from other games because it lacked a leaderboard (and it did not have the usual 3 lives). So in the light of that, I don't think we'll ever see one.

We could call it something other than a Leaderboard, then. After all, it would only help to see potential bots, making them less effective if they don't want to blow their cover in solo. It's only more information vs no information. Calling it a "weekly report" would be more accurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom