FD haven't even made a token gesture to the problem in that time :/
Get the pitchforks men .. I hear a rumbling is coming
FD haven't even made a token gesture to the problem in that time :/
In the original post I included a link to my subreddit that I co-moderate, which is very comprehensive in the details for each log. However, it was removed for "naming and shaming", which has now muddied the water due to a lack of information to back up my claim. If I could un-moderate it, I would (I'd probably still get banned though)
Moderator actions aren’t always correct; if you feel that a moderation action was performed against you incorrectly, please see the final post on how to appeal. Openly posting about a moderation action upon you or others on the forums will not be permitted.
We do not permit our forums to be used as a medium to name and shame, or to witch-hunt other people in our games.
By the way, did that particular CMDR make your list of combat loggers?
Frontier do not publish any statistics relating to how they deal with players who cheat - however, just because they don't publish does not mean that nothing is done.
Pro-active measures to deal with Combat Logging would require the networking architecture to be changed. As Sandro has said, there is no "infallible arbiter" to take over control the departed player's ship.
Frontier do not publish any statistics relating to how they deal with players who cheat - however, just because they don't publish does not mean that nothing is done.
For everyone. This should not be efficient way to avoid destruction for anyone. It should be always at least 45 seconds.
It is not muddled. You are linking to a site that is naming and shaming. We do the same to list of Player Killers.
Frontier do not publish any statistics relating to how they deal with players who cheat - however, just because they don't publish does not mean that nothing is done.
In the original post I included a link to my subreddit that I co-moderate, which is very comprehensive in the details for each log. However, it was removed for "naming and shaming", which has now muddied the water due to a lack of information to back up my claim. If I could un-moderate it, I would (I'd probably still get banned though)
In the original post I included a link to my subreddit that I co-moderate, which is very comprehensive in the details for each log. However, it was removed for "naming and shaming", which has now muddied the water due to a lack of information to back up my claim. If I could un-moderate it, I would (I'd probably still get banned though)
Frontier do not publish any statistics relating to how they deal with players who cheat - however, just because they don't publish does not mean that nothing is done.
They're all the same aren't they.Well, that's usually what it means.
All the other online gaming companies are very vocal about their "ban hammer swingerfests".
And reddit is filled with the rage of those .. 5 or so .. "innocent" bannees that have done "nothing wrong" .. until someone brings up videos of them doing exactly what they claim they didn't do.
Yes it does, secret bans have absolutely no impact on cheater populations its long been studied/practiced, player psychology has always dictated that cheating isn't worth the effort if your going to get caught you aren't interested as a developer in meeting out justice to the few your interested in less cheaters, you don't get less cheaters by pretending your doing nothing, while actually doing nothing.
I was trying to suggest a change that would not lead to more players in ships incapable of combat choosing to play in game modes with fewer players....
Maybe they would be happier PvPers if they would stop making up their own win conditions?
I've somewhat followed the PvP League and it's development and it seems that agreed competition and win conditions is a known concept in the "PvP circles".
Noone brings his 200 rebuy ships to the battle.
2.1 engineering updates will not be allowed for the finals (I doubt Adle's would mind "grinding" that stuff in record time - seems they're already pretty well prepared for the upcoming changes .. their opponents need some breathing room, so as good sportsmen they agree on the common ground).
Now all of a sudden it's open world open PvP and some strut around defining their own win conditions and expect everyone around them to play along? eh..
I dunno, I've reported many combat loggers who I've know have combat logged at least 5 or 6 times before. We have bets on how fast they will log if you try and even say hello.
Group of rabid PvP'ers stomp all over the game and engage in extremely ungentlemanly behaviour.
Same group of rabid PvP'ers then scream when others engage in ungentlemanly behaviour.
The irony. I can't stop laughing at this thread![]()
If your contention is that Frontier is doing nothing with regard to punishment of players who Combat Log then I'll have to agree to disagree on that point.
Regarding the 15-second timer, I'd certainly be in favour of significantly increasing it for the player who initiated combat....
Hi Robert, is this just conjecture or do you have any evidence to support this statement?