New Regions – Why not use the ones already established by the exploration community?

Corbin Moran

Corbin Moran
Olivia Vespera said:
as best as i can massage it. I think gmp and others who know the regions better can either fill in the blanks or create new names from the old ones.
Click to expand...

While this implementation would probably be much easier Im not sure it is the way to go...

I tried to have a go at it myself (click image for full size):



While there is good correspondence in some areas, in other it is completely off. Also a consequence of this would be that the Conflux Abandoned Settlements are no longer located in the Conflux, and the same goes for the Formidine Rift Abandoned Settlements - since the new region borders twist in such a way that they just exactly exclude them...

Personally I think Id rather wish for the map overlay idea than twisting the existing regions into too unrecognizable shapes... Something to sleep on I guess...


Anyways, its been a long day, so Ill sign off for now.

But before I go, Id like to end the day by saying a very big thank you on behalf of myself and the GMP team to all who has chimed in on this thread so far. Your comments and support are very much appreciated.
 

Jah'bastah II

Jah'bastah II
/signed

However,

The Perseus Crags - Region 29 - ...
The Perseus Crags - Region 30 - ...
Region 30 - The Perseus Crags - ...
Region 30 - Hyponia - ...

Doesn't need to change anything. Both are regions, just used differently. Formal vs informal. And combined, they make locations more specific.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom