Excuse me for being late to the game here but is my LEP account really, truly not going to get access to the P MkII until August unless I shell-out moolah? How can this be justified?
Gross. This is pretty much the defnition of p2w, and the defenders sound exactly like SC fans.
No, this is not what they have to do, this is what they chose to do. And there is zero word on any meaningful expansion whatsoever. P2W, FOMO, skip-the-grind-for-only-$12 or whatever scummy tactics are always an option. Making quality expansions and selling them to your customers is how a reputable game studio works. This is just sleazy.
Your mortal soul.Anyone know how much the seal clubbing starter pack will be?![]()
On 'gross', and SC comparisons. Okay, I get that. And yeahhhh, I probably agree. But paying £9 for a presumably pretty low level Chieftain with task-specific modules pre-installed, compared to paying £200 - £2000 for a non-existent jpeg?
ED may be edging into p2w, SC is a scam.
I'm unsure how else they could do what they clearly are trying to do: making a decade old game on life support last a little longer, by removing the grind to some degree.
Frankly, I'd rather buy a full price DLC for expanded atmospheric planets and gas giants.
LEP never stated it included early access to future additions?Excuse me for being late to the game here but is my LEP account really, truly not going to get access to the P MkII until August unless I shell-out moolah? How can this be justified?
The last 2 years of financial troubles at the company went over your head?I'm somewhat torn on the pre-built ships. I get the problem it aims to address, and it is a problem worth addressing, but I'm not sure why it's only fixed by paying Arx.
Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it less grindy to outfit a ship from scratch for a new gameplay style, in game, without paying Arx?
Even better idea lets have almost anything other than subs.This is good news.
But fdev... let's have subs and not ships purchasing, even stealthily. I mean who has 16000+ arx off the bat banked!?
Q: how long to bank 16k arx via ingame only?
Oh sure, agree with all the above. And yeah, SC is like a compilation of all the worst industry practices dialed up to 11, and ED is nowhere near that. But it a a difference by degrees now, and that is disappointing.Elite Dangerous, the game you and I bought many moons ago is nearing the end of it's unnaturally long life, and it's quite a pleasant surprise it's still here. Elite Dangerous 2024 therefore is a different beast, developed/maintained largely by different people than those who created it. And this is just where we are, for better or worse.
On 'gross', and SC comparisons. Okay, I get that. And yeahhhh, I probably agree. But paying £9 for a presumably pretty low level Chieftain with task-specific modules pre-installed, compared to paying £200 - £2000 for a non-existent jpeg?
ED may be edging into p2w, SC is a scam.
That being said, do I think they should do the ship-build-for-arx, on balance? No.
Ideally they could simply add onto the game in ways their customers have been asking for for ages, and then sell it for a fair price once they get it working properly. Atmo planets, ship interiors, whatever. Look at Paradox for how to constantly create revenue by making the game deeper and richer over and over. Besides, so far ED has been profitable every year for them, the minor costs of upkeep are offset fully by the cosmetics store and random purchases of the game/odyssey. They don't have to do this if they just want to keep the light on.But I'm unsure how else they could do what they clearly are trying to do: making a decade old game on life support last a little longer, by removing the grind to some degree.
Meh.
Or monthly subscription fee, choose your poisonPre-built ships for real cash now?
That's why I hate online games.
Thing is, the only real hurdle to "just build it yourself" is the Engineering, and they're making that "more accessible and predictable" as per Buur's latest video.The last 2 years of financial troubles at the company went over your head?
I don't disagree on early access, in this case it's a simple get-something-early-for-cash deal. Not really different from previous fdev alpha beta offers etc.Early access is not necessarily P2W, because after a few months everyone will have access to the same ship.
Those troubles are not because of ED, which has been not just self-sufficient but even profitable year after year. The problems FD are facing is because they insist on spending as little money as possible on the products their customers ask for, and instead offer fundamentally broken new-IP to minuscule audiences for premium prices. Which somehow turns out to not be a winning strategy.The last 2 years of financial troubles at the company went over your head?
Although three months is a pretty long time, especially given it is for a ship variant after years of offering zero new ships. The concept of a brief EA period isn't that out of the ordinary, but the context makes it a bit more dubious to me. Especially since they really seem to be angling for the "just toss us a coin, we're adding so much cool stuff for you guys like the mysterious new feature we cant tell anything about and PP 2.0 which we also couldn't tell you anything about because one dude wasn't in the office that evening. But its really really cool!"I don't disagree on early access, in this case it's a simple get-something-early-for-cash deal. Not really different from previous fdev alpha beta offers etc.
Yup.Oh sure, agree with all the above. And yeah, SC is like a compilation of all the worst industry practices dialed up to 11, and ED is nowhere near that.
Fair. I'm uneasy about it.But it a a difference by degrees now, and that is disappointing.
ha haAlthough three months is a pretty long time, especially given it is for a ship variant after years of offering zero new ships. The concept of a brief EA period isn't that out of the ordinary, but the context makes it a bit more dubious to me. Especially since they really seem to be angling for the "just toss us a coin, we're adding so much cool stuff for you guys like the mysterious new feature we cant tell anything about and PP 2.0 which we also couldn't tell you anything about because one dude wasn't in the office that evening. But its really really cool!"
Its not quite the same as doing a brief EA after delivering cool new features.
As you said, its not a huge issue in the scheme of things, but still. Kinda like how it grinds my gears that sliced bread is as expensive as non-sliced bread, but cubed cheese is marked up heavily from non-cubed cheese. I wont burn the parlement down over it, but I might make an angry post about it while I wait for my download to finish. : P
It never stated late access to futute additions either.LEP never stated it included early access to future additions?
This is just the same as when you couldn’t buy Horizons ships in game if you didn’t own Horizons just the base game.I don't disagree with you .... however ...
Not making the ship available for EVERYONE to buy in-game is Star Citizen scummy, and goes against all the goodwill Frontier have built up with the community over the last 10 years, heck we even gave you a pass when you brought in ARX
They also didn't include unicorns.It never stated late access to futute additions either.