Rare/non-exist animal in captivity wishlist

The same is true for Tasmanian Devils and yet they're on your list - just replace 'Europe' with 'internationally' and 'The Americas' with 'Australia'.

I reckon those two species are more common outside their native range than the devil? I included the devil particularly because only devils past breeding age are being exported, if I'm not mistaken.

If the community can agree they are common enough outside of Australia, I'll happily take it out. Although, as far as I know, sustainability is still an issue for devils outside Australia.

No silly, Australia is not Europe or North America and therefore its zoos don't count /s

I'm Aussie myself, mate!
 
I reckon those two species are more common outside their native range than the devil?
Are they? Tasmanian Devils’ native range is (surprise) Tasmania, which doesn’t really have any zoos , per se. (There are a couple of c-grade zoos, which don’t have devils, and a couple sanctuaries that do)… devils in captivity are more common outside their range (across Australia) than they are within it (within Tasmania)… indeed, there are more zoos with devils just in Victoria (outside their range) than there are in Tasmania.
 
Last edited:
Are they? Tasmanian Devils’ native range is (surprise) Tasmania, which doesn’t really have any zoos , per se. (There are a couple of c-grade zoos, which don’t have devils, and a couple sanctuaries that do)… devils in captivity are more common outside their range (across Australia) than they are within it (within Tasmania)… indeed, there are more zoos with devils just in Victoria (outside their range) than there are in Tasmania.

Could you submit your wishlist?
 
Are they? Tasmanian Devils’ native range is (surprise) Tasmania, which doesn’t really have any zoos , per se. (There are a couple of c-grade zoos, which don’t have devils, and a couple sanctuaries that do)… devils in captivity are more common outside their range (across Australia) than they are within it (within Tasmania)… indeed, there are more zoos with devils just in Victoria (outside their range) than there are in Tasmania.
Out of curiosity, why is that? Is it to prevent inbreeding within Tasmania, so exporting different groups can expand the gene pool?
 
Are they? Tasmanian Devils’ native range is (surprise) Tasmania, which doesn’t really have any zoos , per se. (There are a couple of c-grade zoos, which don’t have devils, and a couple sanctuaries that do)… devils in captivity are more common outside their range (across Australia) than they are within it (within Tasmania)… indeed, there are more zoos with devils just in Victoria (outside their range) than there are in Tasmania.

The problem with that argument is that devils are also native to the mainland, although they were extirpated until recent reintroduction efforts. Therefore, I'm counting Australia as a whole in this context.
 
Are they? Tasmanian Devils’ native range is (surprise) Tasmania, which doesn’t really have any zoos , per se. (There are a couple of c-grade zoos, which don’t have devils, and a couple sanctuaries that do)… devils in captivity are more common outside their range (across Australia) than they are within it (within Tasmania)… indeed, there are more zoos with devils just in Victoria (outside their range) than there are in Tasmania.
I agree with this. I don't think countries should be counted as an animals whole range. There's a reason why people don't say Hawaiian animals are mostly found in their native range because their in USA which has a lot of zoos.
 
I agree with this. I don't think countries should be counted as an animals whole range. There's a reason why people don't say Hawaiian animals are mostly found in their native range because their in USA which has a lot of zoos.

I agree with this logic too, for instance in our case American crocodiles in the whole of US are native only to southern Florida, so I wouldn't count anything outside Florida as native. However, my point with the devils was, they are actually native to the entire continent, apparently except for the driest parts of the interior.


 
1684089087044.png
 
  • Saiga Antelope (CR)
View attachment 355475
  • Tibetan Antelope (NT)
View attachment 355476
  • Ethiopian Wolf (EN)
View attachment 355477
  • Andean Mountain Cat (EN)
View attachment 355478
  • Southern Elephant Seal (LC)
View attachment 355479
  • Blue-spotted Tree Monitor (EN)
View attachment 355480
  • Seven-colored Tanager (VU)
View attachment 355481
  • Galapagos Pink Land Iguana (CR)
View attachment 355482
  • Giant Mudskipper (LC)
View attachment 355483
  • Tibetan Blue Bear (NT)
View attachment 355484

My two new additions to my list is this

  • Musk Ox (LC)
f.elconfidencial.com_original_f50_67d_675_f5067d67598a278c2f45451834c34392.jpg

  • Black-footed Ferret (EN)
Mustela_nigripes_2.jpg
 
Also wanted to mention I feel like the perenties aren't that rare especially compared to the other animals. 9 of the 12 zoos I've been to in my life had them.
 
Sumatran rhino is the only one I desperately want.

Edit: I should add that I also want a bunch of NZ animals that are technically rare in captivity, but they're all super common here so I don't know what the rules are regarding that.
 
While at this point I'm not supportive of the inclusion of species like saiga, Sumatran rhino, etc. I do think it would be interesting if we had some kind of 'wildlife reserve' option. Both species don't do well in zoos, but it may be nice to have them in some form of safari park or wildlife reserve (also in line with the original name of the game and the conservation aspect of it).
 
Back
Top Bottom