<nods> This! This thread cannot help, but it could harm!But... the perpetuation of this thread can't be helpful to Sarah-Jane's cause...
<nods> This! This thread cannot help, but it could harm!But... the perpetuation of this thread can't be helpful to Sarah-Jane's cause...
Are you threatening physical violence against me for a differing point of view?
Well that's fair enough then sir. Indeed SELLING for moral reasons is acceptable.
Indeed, I made a loss on Frontier. Them's the breaks but glad I sold when I did because the share price continues to tank. Might actually be a good time to buy again.
I find a cause is always helped best by smearing my own excrement on everything then jumping up and down crying.
I would like to point out that almost no company discusses their internal stuff with public or their clients.
<nods> This! This thread cannot help, but it could harm!
Perhaps you should tell my employer and clients that then. WE're a big believer in project persistency where I work.Given a lot of my work is client facing, and we regularly interact with our clients (I'm a combo project manager/technical engineer/test lead for what it's worth) our clients tend to get understandably nervous if and when one of us is moved to another project at the last minute.
Different strokes for different folks I suspect.
If she had been given a sprint deadline it's odd that she seemed so surprised and upset to be moved. And the AI is broken according to a now redacted post made yesterday morning. All AI is behaving as harmless.
Passionate ain't the word I'd use for them, but there you go!... the more 'passionate' posters in this thread...
Passionate ain't the word I'd use for them, but there you go!
Probably the most reasonable explanation I've seen so far.
Probably the most reasonable explanation I've seen so far.
Aye, and I ain't ready for a ban quite yet! They said this forum had an older, more mature, demographic than most - codswallop!Not my choice either but chose diplomacy over truth!
Really? We have no information whatsoever, yet you allow yourself to question the management and even insult them. That's preposterous.
No, though that does have an impact on my view of the FD 'morals'. Trying to argue that people who wanted offline were not entitled to a refund because they had played online in the beta, was indefensible.
Yes, I understand that eventually FD did the right thing.By the way, what happened with that? Did those people who play online eventually get their money back?
And you're comment sir shows you don't understand sprint planning and priority management.
This isn't an infinite monkeys scenario. If I give you 2 sprints to fix something, and 4 sprints in it's still not delivered then it's time to move on and maybe let someone else have a look at it. You've already cost me 2 sprints where I could have used you as a resource.