Marabou stork (155 holdings)My thoughts. I prefer a less versatile but more "spectacular" animal. I mean if you want a species only because it's easy to place, then I don't really see the point of having it anymore. Let me be clear, I would accept any kind of bird but the justification of "It's not common in zoos" or "They do not represent this continent the best" is something I can't understand. I like to have a mix of common and "more special" species. So yeah, I'm rooting for secretary and shoebill too.
Grey Crowned Crane (100 holdings)
Great White Pelican (224 holdings)
Southern Ground Hornbill (124 Holdings)
Secretary Bird (57 holdings)
Shoebill (11 holdings)
Not saying your wrong, but i bet you feel real dumb rn saying that the common birds are lame when these first 5 are all very much very common birds.
Even the shoebill isnt that rare its just that its history in captivity has been quite the detrament to species survival due to next to no breeding success and wildlife trafficking to sell shoebills to zoos with less then great moral makeup.
Common animals =/= boring animals.
All 6 of these are spectacular birds in their own way, saying one of them is more special for being rare in captivity might not be objectivly wrong, but saying the rest are for being common might aswell be.