This. I tried alot to apply Hanlon's Razor to these people, but not anymore, they're active cogs of the deception machine this mess of a project has become (and maybe always have been)Just block the troll guys.
This. I tried alot to apply Hanlon's Razor to these people, but not anymore, they're active cogs of the deception machine this mess of a project has become (and maybe always have been)Just block the troll guys.
Well, own pockets & publisher pockets is not going to happen. Investors it already happening, so we'll see if they will expand that, but I am very certain they will not expand it to a scale where they don't need to rely on crowdfund money.Like others do, either from their own pockets, from investors pockets, or from publishers pockets.
No no you don't understand, SC has horrendous scope creep, scope cannot be restricted. And still waiting for that crash and burn stage, according to Mr. Smart that happened around the 2017 Holiday livestream but that's a whole other topic.Though in reality of course SC style "development" would either crash and burn, or scope would have been severely restricted and game had been released ages ago.
Still no solution to the crowdfunding problem...Serious answers require serious questions. Your question cannot be taken seriously on several levels, starting from the underlying assumptions and ending with the lack of the very definition of "better". In fact, "cucumber", "absolutely" and "John Wick" are perfectly fine answers given the quality of the question.
Don't? It doesn't need funding. A tapered cash flow would force them to release something, and based on the quality of that something, they might generate more revenue, which they could then reinvest in expanding and improving their product(s).Better way to fund it?
Backers are not investors, succesfull investors tend not to be gullible marks with their money But rather want return on their investments. Just like publishers do. Thats the reason why CR did not go through traditional funding route. He has rather bad reoutation on gaming industry circles.And still waiting for that crash and burn stage, according to Mr. Smart that happened around the 2017 Holiday livestream but that's a whole other topic.
And now we're back at this conspiracy, no. Not a solution.Don't? It doesn't need funding. A tapered cash flow would force them to release something, and based on the quality of that something, they might generate more revenue, which they could then reinvest in expanding and improving their product(s).
The option to stop funding always exists, because continued funding hasn't brought CIG closer to the finish line in a decade. They aren't anywhere near their original pitch, much less all the other dreams they haven't delivered.
John Wick is always a good answer. To any question.Serious answers require serious questions. Your question cannot be taken seriously on several levels, starting from the underlying assumptions and ending with the lack of the very definition of "better". In fact, "cucumber", "absolutely" and "John Wick" are perfectly fine answers given the quality of the question.
I don't see a conspiracy. I just see a list of unchecked boxes established and unfulfilled by CIG.And now we're back at this conspiracy, no. Not a solution.
There's a new version of Goat simulator? Yay! Space Goat Simulator has tons more fidelity than Star CitizenNew version of goat simulator looking good!
So you cannot provide an actual answer? Thanks
There's a new version of Goat simulator? Yay! Space Goat Simulator has tons more fidelity than Star Citizen
And surely not giving them any more money is going to make the game release? Right?I don't see a conspiracy. I just see a list of unchecked boxes established and unfulfilled by CIG.
When money is paid and deliverables aren't, well, delivered, the hired party doesn't get continued funding for further delays.
Just to think, it took CIG years to catch up to the jankiness of joke game, Goat Simulator: Waste of Space.New version of goat simulator looking good!
Bankruptcy! That will make them release a game! Somehow...Do you know what Star Citizen needs?
Giving them money certainly hasn't, but no one has tried the alternative (usually out of sunk cost and fear that their dream bubble will burst).And surely not giving them any more money is going to make the game release? Right?
Now that I am looking forward to.One thing's for sure though. We'll be seeing you at the Prediction Awards at the end of this year. Of that I have no doubt
There is no crowdfunding problem. Crowdfunding for SC stopped at the end of the KS campaign. Now it is just an online store with assets and game packages.Still no solution to the crowdfunding problem...
When you reward bad behauviour, you are not going to get good behauviour. Say you have a puppy and you are trying to train it to be house clean. Do you offer it a treat every time it does its natural needs on your living room carpet? How long you think it will take to teach it to be house clean that way?And surely not giving them any more money is going to make the game release? Right?