Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
That would be a good reason for scenario 2
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Reddit's taking the news wellThis does not seem like it should be a thing that you work diligently on. Should be pretty easy.
Spectrum - v7.1.1
RSIās Spectrum is our integrated community and player interaction service, including chat, forums, game integration, and Player Organization facilities. Player Organizations (āOrgā...robertsspaceindustries.com
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/13s5g9c/zylohcig_on_ship_claim_timers_the_team_is_aware/
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/13s5g9c/zylohcig_on_ship_claim_timers_the_team_is_aware/jlo5o5r/
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/13s5g9c/zylohcig_on_ship_claim_timers_the_team_is_aware/jlo722c/
This entire "SQ42 is SC, but offline" line is so ridiculous I cannot even. It makes no sense.Did you see that recent CiG video where they showed something off (for SC) on a dev machine? The frame rate was really low and Jared's response was 'well, he's running the server on his own box' (as SQ42 will), and 'not all devs have the fastest PCs' (so, like player PCs). I hope it comes out soon
Exactly, ROTFLOL ! The second scenario is ridiculous but perfectly expected to be heard in this forum !
They just change the SQ42 page because the marketing department prepare the next commercial step about SQ42, nothing more.
And ? SC server, even on a local machine, is still configured in full multiplayer mode with all components used for multiplayer. SQ42 is in solo mode... you can completely shut down every part of the server which is not in managing visible parts to the player and completely remove all parts managing what other players do.Did you see that recent CiG video where they showed something off (for SC) on a dev machine? The frame rate was really low and Jared's response was 'well, he's running the server on his own box' (as SQ42 will), and 'not all devs have the fastest PCs' (so, like player PCs). I hope it comes out soon
That's got to be a bug, yes that should work.
Diligently working at changing some variables that they already changed once recently without any apparent effort?
Yes, there is a third option, even if it is the least likely.
SQ42 has been what? $45? they might actually be getting ready to release it in 6 moths or so and its going to be $75, so they want to take it off sale, not that its selling.... and then introduce its full price when it launches.
Hides
... And can't be seamlessly rolled out server-side but requires a new build.
What. As for anything CIG, dev only started 2 years ago and will surely be released in the next 2 years.
Unfortunately, anyone who's been reading the Monthly Sq42 Reports (totally not generated by ChatGPT) can see that the game is still years away from being ready.
But they must be only weeks away from release. Gimli was in doing some mocap!
You only do that just before release, right?
Once again, you show a complete lack of understanding of how complex client-server applications work, while demonstrating an incredibly arrogant and naive belief in whatever you pull out of your rear end.
This will be a fine thing to quote as 'Old Man' gruffly turns into rubber...
I've just thought about this and i think i know what's going on here.
The cargo grid snap thingy does not activate until you let go of the box, there is a slight delay, with it being vertical it could just be falling off the grid before it gets a chance to grab it.
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Think you misunderstood. Ā« Giving up on it Ā» is referring to giving up on selling it (at least for now), not giving up on SQ42 altogether. I mean that could also be the case but that could happen with or without a sales point anyways.
So I see you think they have removed it from sale so to put it back on sale again
Why not then simply leave it as it was and change to the new Ā« commercial step Ā» when ready? Why make it impossible to buy SQ42 now and deny yourself some perfectly good sales?
Last edited:
I hope not...
It could also be that the regulators told them to stop selling something that has been in development for 10 years, is still not in sight and has no end date.