Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
The reason they have a game to release is because someone took those hard decisions. I'm sure they would have loved to put that stuff in. But at some point you have to stop and say "OK no more new features" and get the thing out the door.
What is this heresy?
Don't you know if you just have the desire and dream you can add everything you want to a game. Its those lazy money grabbing devs who just want to make money limit themselves to releasing games that don't do everything!
It's a perfect and valid decision to not add real ship to SF. When you strip all technical difficulties, you can release your game sooner.
SF will be great (I love Skyrim) and I will play it. But it will be another space game where you will not feel that you are living in a 'real' ship.
I will finish the whole campaing of SF and afterthat, will come back to SC.
Ah yes, twcenter - that was my go to ressource for editing. Totally forgot about the place.
Just realised CDPR are delivering a large expansion and a complete overhaul of Cyberpunk 2077 core gameplay systems in less than half of the time SQ42 has been delayed by since we answered the call in 2016.
CP2077 is another redemption story, and I am really happy about it.
Meanwhile, SQ42 cannot be even pre-purchased anymore.
CP2077 is another redemption story, and I am really happy about it.
Meanwhile, SQ42 cannot be even pre-purchased anymore.
Denial: "Why care about Starfield? No-one plays single player games"
Anger: "Bethesda scammers! I'm loyal to Chris!"
Bargaining: "you'll play Starfield for a bit then you'll be back to SC, anyway Squadron 42 and server meshing are coming soon"
Depression: "Starfield has all the things Chris promised me years ago, i can't believe he lied to me..."
Acceptance: "yeah, I'll play Starfield too"
Anger: "Bethesda scammers! I'm loyal to Chris!"
Bargaining: "you'll play Starfield for a bit then you'll be back to SC, anyway Squadron 42 and server meshing are coming soon"
Depression: "Starfield has all the things Chris promised me years ago, i can't believe he lied to me..."
Acceptance: "yeah, I'll play Starfield too"
Don't be giving them ideas, you know they'll be selling star systems for $$$.
Let my guess. Another SC killer ? Like Odyssey or DU ?
Acceptance ! Lol. A vast majority of SC players have been waiting for SF since it was announced ! Believing that SC players are in a cult and are unable to play other games clouds your brain !
It's bedsheet-crazy!
Mmmnnnnuuughhh. I know people like happy endings but isn't that a bit clichée?
You can modularly add a star system to your ship and take the quanta out of it!
Btw, anyone heard of Tony Donotgud lately?
They just don't understand AAAAAA game development.
The only game they won't be able to play in 6 months is SC.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
This wins the internet today
Because SF is gonna occupy most of their time. It's how MP games get cannibalised. "Is this game dead?" - Well no, it's just that a lot of peeps try out something different and don't got the time for yet another game. So revenues drop, maybe confidence drops and the devs may will have to bake smaller buns.
Doesn't sound so quantastic, right? But it's the way stale games can quickly take.
The inability to fly over a planet's surface is a shame - it's an aspect of ED and NMS that can be fun (and helpful).
Ship-to ship docking and stealing/looting/derelicts is something I dearly wish that ED had implemented.
I'd be quite surprised if ground vehicles weren't part of the first DLC, but only time will tell on that. In any event, there seems to be plenty to get on with in September.
The terrain and atmosphere generation looked to be significantly better than ED, albeit, this is now a 10-year old game. The visuals looked stunning!
The ship combat and flight model in Starfield seems more 'NMS' than ED. But, given that (like NMS) it's a game set in space, rather than a space-game, I guess that was to be expected. The outpost and ship building looks like a hoot!
One significant point of note is that Bethesda have dropped an in-depth, 45 minute, video of actual gameplay of Starfield, all without giving too much of the plot away...
...1 for the Chairman maybe...? Or has that got as stale as a pile of days-old (and persistent*) sandwiches...
* sorry, I couldn't resist...
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
This can’t be stressed enough. It speaks volumes of SQ42’s CIG deafening silence and the game development state and progres (or lack of it rather, as the case may be). That and a release date in less than 2 months.
Remind me again @LittleAnt how you think SQ404 release is imminent?
Last edited:
There is nothing to think when you just pull something from your rear.