Rinzler o7o7o7
Banned
I challenge you Rinzler. To create the same kind of high quality video, but with grown up narrative.![]()
I don't cater to snowflakes.
I challenge you Rinzler. To create the same kind of high quality video, but with grown up narrative.![]()
If you're fit with rinzler's fit, I would go out of my way to kill you for wasting internals for a shield generator instead of a cargo rack. Stop fitting to kill your already poor capacity
It is usually pretty trivial to follow someone that high wakes to another system even if you don't have a wake scanner.
Lets say I interdict you and pull you out of supercruise. You do all the right stuff and high wake out. In most cases I will be somewhat behind you and see the direction you were flying when you wake out.
All I have to do now is go to my Nav panel and start selecting systems until the system icon is right where you were pointing. Most people pick one of the first systems (actually most people don't high wake at all, at this point you are already pretty advanced) and I can be there right behind you.
Before the new C&P changes, most of the ships attacking you would not have very good fsd range at all. But now with the possibility of ending up at a prison ship, at least for me, my ship will have decent jump range. An unintended consequence of the C&P is that I can and will chase you to a different system if I am in the mood.
Good to know. So:-
Best to FA off when fleeing and only line up on the jump system when you need to.
Don't always pick the closest target
I'd love to test this to see if the pursuer can find me once I have high waked out (then dropped and either boosted away with SR, or jumped again to a new system), with a wake scanner or not (preferable testing both)
I imagine your willingness to pursue is based on:-
How many other CMDRS there are in the instance already
How much offence you have taken at my amusing macro generated direct comms message (ranging from "YOUR MOM" to "Hey, can you cut a brother a break?" and "OMGWTF!!!!!!!!one111!"
How bored you are
How confident you are on catching me
I don't cater to snowflakes.
I don't cater to snowflakes.
So if someone more patient could just write out the advice in a clear, concise and forum friendly way, that should solve the problem.
The OP isn't going to do it, so the floor is open for someone else to do it.
I'd be happy to write it out in a helpful mega-post on open survival, but criticizing my video doesn't achieve anything. I made it to be humorous and not 100% serious, and that's exactly what it is.
Some people just like to nit-pick because they dislike the messenger, not the message itself. His comment history in this sub-forum is enough to warn me not to waste my time pandering to his wishes.
I don't dislike the messenger (I am ambivalent), only the way the message is delivered. I appreciate that it's your style, but you must also appreciate that this is a game (and therefore forum) suitable for children aged seven and above. JWE is 16+, IIRC Planet Coaster is PEGI 3. Frontier aren't going to accommodate your artistic style.
If you are happy for this sub-section of the official forum to languish for the sake of your artistic integrity then there is no problem, some one else can do it.
Art never apologizes. And if you don't like the tone, why don't and globus get together and make a rated G version based on your vast experience?
I like the video. But (there's always a 'but', sorry) it's not really looking like an art form nor rocket science. Can YOU answer the crucial question why on earth someone would want to trade in Open at all? If it's not for the bragging rights (it's not as you certainly can confirm) or the purpose of producing a funny and entertaining video (which it is, I give you that!), why would I possibly bother at all? It does not add any options when the only one is running.
I like the video. But (there's always a 'but', sorry) it's not really looking like an art form nor rocket science. Can YOU answer the crucial question why on earth someone would want to trade in Open at all? If it's not for the bragging rights (it's not as you certainly can confirm) or the purpose of producing a funny and entertaining video (which it is, I give you that!), why would I possibly bother at all? It does not add any options when the only one is running.
I can answer you even though you didnt ask me. There is absolutely no point in trading in open as far as progression is concerned. We can only blame the unbalanced mode system for this.
Is that what you want?
ETA: If I were to literally transcribe the video and rephrase it to use acceptable words would it still be good advice?
"Is that what I want?"
Why on Earth would I personally want that, Riverside?
Because that is what you asked for.
No, it is not what I asked for. You're just being a troll. I clearly intended my words as a suggestion, rather than a request. You are the one with a problem. You are the one patronizing the video and condescending to Rinzler. The proper course of action would be for YOU to create a more useful and "acceptable" guide.
And by "you" I mean you and globus.
Can YOU answer the crucial question why on earth someone would want to trade in Open at all?