You made the point better than I did. Obviously "clone" isn't exactly accurate but it's probably the best way to describing it. We definitely do not need any more paid dlc packs that have "clones" in them. If the next paid dlc is indeed Europe, that means no Wisent, brown bears or wolves! I think the community is sick of them on the whole. Let's take a look at each dlc so far, and what animals the community calls clones:
Arctic Pack
- Polar bear: I don't think it's fair to call this a "clone" and be mad Frontier included it. It was simply too iconic and needed to be in the game, despite it being the fifth bear in the game. If anything though, it emphasizes the point that the Himalayan bear never should have been added, and something else should have.
- Arctic wolf: Absolutely fair to criticize. As far as the in-game creature is concerned, they barely changed the model for the Timber wolf to use for this. Plus a new skin of course. Everyone and their mother wanted the Arctic fox, they clearly included this because it required less work, so they could work on other things. Would've paid another $1 for a fox, minus the wolf, and the rest of the same content tbh.
Overall, the Arctic pack is probably the best imo. It added a lot of great pieces, especially for taiga and tundra zoos (plus the tundra biome as a zoo option). Animal choice for the most part were enjoyable, even if the Dall sheep over Musk ox was a little odd. Great in-game music as well.
South America Pack
- Jaguar: Again, I don't think it's fair to criticize this pick. They left it out of the main game to, like the Polar bear and Red kangaroo, to be the main ticket items in order to sell their respective dlc. I feel like any South American dlc would've sold well regardless, but I digress. I will say however that the baby jaguars look horrendous and cartoony, and I really wish they would fix them.
- Llama: Terrible pick. Just awful. I'm sorry and I know people like the actual animal, but they added a domesticated animal in a South American pack with only four slots. Not even the wild ancestor, which still exists! How you justify this over the capybara, or howler monkey, or a thousand other things I will never understand. Essentially was just a white camel before we got the color variation update.
The South America pack is probably the worst for me. I'm happy to have the jaguars (expect for those ugly babies) and the Giant anteaters look great (though I wish the babies rode on their moms like they should). It's definitely frustrating that Frontier chose a Capuchin species that mostly lives in Central America over South America. I still hate the Llamas being added.
Australia Pack
- Cassowary: Let's be honest, we all knew it was this or the Emu. I made my peace with that and just accepted it, and fair enough, we needed more birds even if it functions the same as the ostrich. The choice of it being a Cassowary though....it's a stretch. I mean they look amazing, but choosing them over the emu which is the national animal of Australia? Tough sell there. The Cassowary could've fit more easily into a Southeast Asian pack imo.
- Dingo: I think it's totally fair to criticize this over the Tasmanian devil. It's not just another canine, but it's another Canis lupus! That's why it was added, same as the Arctic wolf. You can defend this decision if you want, but that's what it is. No excuse to exclude the most iconic predator in Australia, the Tasmanian devil, in favor of the dingo.
The Australian pack was good, and I enjoyed the building pieces more than I thought I would. The foliage was exceptional as well. The game is much, much better with kangaroos. And yeah the dingos are cute, but big whoop. I don't care. Devils should've been in instead.
So in a way, there have been two "clones" in each pack. Some are a total non-issue (unless you have an issue with them not being in the base game) and some are pretty problematic. I would much rather we just get four totally unique animals for a change!