(incredulous face)You need more than one?(/incredulous face)
It's up to you if you think it's worth it, here's a handy chart for you to help decide.
http://i.imgur.com/omzijnI.png
How was the information in that chart gathered? Have not seen anything from FD on official shield numbers yet.
That and there was a dev post that said that chart was not accurate.
This is apparently accurate, I use at as a guide https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...ES69Lc317U/pubhtml?gid=2011892275&single=true
They said those shield values were wrong, but they aren't.
If you go pewpew and check the relative strength of each shield the numbers stack - it might be that a clipper has 400 shields and lasers do 5, it might be that thye have 200 and lasers do 10 but in proportion to the other ships the numbers stack in my experience, perfectly.
That one and the version on the wiki (link below) were calculated according to the figures and method one of the devs discussed with us in a thread.Not trying to be offensive but without knowing how the data on that table was gathered or someone from FD backing it as truth it is about as useful as the other table.
Just so you know that table isn't really correct at all.Look at the shield values:
http://i.imgur.com/omzijnI.png
It has equal or better shields than the Anaconda. All other non-freighter big ships are tiny in comparison - the nearest being the Clipper with shields just over half the value of the Python shields. The Clipper is also close in basic price to the Python; closer than either are to the Anaconda, but the firepower of the Python is more.
The Clipper is the ship that most favourably compares with the Python in that size category.
On top of these tanky shields, the Python is no slouch in turning. Imagine a Cobra (in terms of movement) that is more than four times as tough, with three times the firepower.
If it is 'medium', it should lose most of the shields and large hardpoints.
This is apparently accurate, I use at as a guide https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...ES69Lc317U/pubhtml?gid=2011892275&single=true
Even without the dev quote, the table can be tested to be false. It's wrong. Please stop using it.
Thats not the same table.
Here's my table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Xq2fmxhjfNiwtR2fBR1MAZrwEcjFudSuSjTOLwfcqlM/pubhtml
Not claiming it's completely accurate but it's based on Mike Evan's comments on shield strength